Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Wyoming's proposed anti-LGBT law
- Thread starter JakeStarkey
- Start date
Jim Crow was institutional discrimination. It was ENFORCED by the govt. That's some bullshit.Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.doesn't seem to be obvious to you nazisthank you captain obvious
Desegregation was needed. There should be NO discrimination from the institution. But people can be assholes if they want. If a baker don't want to make a cake, then fuck the cake. They can go next door. But if you think support of individuality and private property makes one a NAZI, then you sir, are a fucking idiot.
You're making the case for allowing Jim Crow back. goddam that's ignorant.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
A business should have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Its THEIR PROPERTY. Involuntary servitude is against the constitution.
I don't want jim crow back, that's a stupid thing to say. And quit ignorant. I just PA laws, state and federal, to go away. In the least, Federal.
your a neo nazi all you want to do is discriminate agianst people based on their behavior... and their race, their religon, their general net worthThis has nothing at all to do with religion, that is only used as a smokescreen. Its all about hate and discriminationFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
It's a core principle of democracy that some things will get 'forced' on you.
Only if there is a compelling government interest, especially if it means infringing on a constitutionally protected right, i.e. the free exercise of religion.
Forcing a baker to bake a cake over butthurt is not a compelling government interest.
Yep, discriminating against people who don't want to associate with others based on their behavior.
are you afraid that if you put all your nazi propaganda in one paragraph nobody will read it. So you just space it out one trollish sentence at a time?Democrat fascism is democrat fascism....I had no idea hitler was so big on gay rights?Cool....there's nothing like seeing the people obliterate democrat fascism....From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
owebo
Gold Member
Just democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.Desegregation was needed. There should be NO discrimination from the institution. But people can be assholes if they want. If a baker don't want to make a cake, then fuck the cake. They can go next door. But if you think support of individuality and private property makes one a NAZI, then you sir, are a fucking idiot.
You're making the case for allowing Jim Crow back. goddam that's ignorant.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.You're making the case for allowing Jim Crow back. goddam that's ignorant.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
owebo
Gold Member
Racist democrats being racist....just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
I don't have the right to discriminate?your a neo nazi all you want to do is discriminate agianst people based on their behavior... and their race, their religon, their general net worthThis has nothing at all to do with religion, that is only used as a smokescreen. Its all about hate and discriminationThis is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
It's a core principle of democracy that some things will get 'forced' on you.
Only if there is a compelling government interest, especially if it means infringing on a constitutionally protected right, i.e. the free exercise of religion.
Forcing a baker to bake a cake over butthurt is not a compelling government interest.
Yep, discriminating against people who don't want to associate with others based on their behavior.
From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
I call bullshit. The proposed law does no such thing. It is a five second google search to find the language of the bill;
http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2017/Introduced/HB0135.pdf
It does not deny state benefits to LGBT people. It does not even mention them. It is a bill which adresses not denying the state benefits of people based on religion. So, for example, the baker who does not want to make a cake for a gay wedding cannot have their state benefits taken away.
Typical left wing lying. Y'all always get caught.
And leftists being leftists.just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
Derelict_Drvr
Gold Member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 1,115
- 205
- 140
No one is forcing their views on anyone, the LGBT community just wants the same rights and privileges as anyone else.That's it exactly, Marty, local elities can't block civil rights.
Period.
So, if the WY lege passes it and the Gov signs it, the legislation then goes to federal court and will be overturned.
Waste of the taxpayers' money.
Depends on the Court.
Still the fault of the LGBT progressive extremists who feel the need to force their views on others.
No, they want "special" rights. Several years ago, Colorado voters approved a law that basically said that the LGBT community they wouldn't be granted rights anymore than those received by any other. The LGBT people took it to court and an activist federal judge "found" the law to unconstitutional.
In short, normal rights and liberties aren't good enough for them.
Do you mean white leftists?And leftists being leftists.just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
Men licking hairy balls is a right?Since when is the LBGT community not entitled to the same rights and protections as any other AmericanFrom a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
Yes, but I also have the right to decline, so just keep yer distance.
Funny, that's exactly what we are saying, we have a right to decline to associate with people who's behavior we find objectionable.
owebo
Gold Member
I'm a conservative, I'm colorblind, unlike you.....Do you mean white leftists?And leftists being leftists.just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....
your a neo nazi all you want to do is discriminate agianst people based on their behavior... and their race, their religon, their general net worthThis has nothing at all to do with religion, that is only used as a smokescreen. Its all about hate and discriminationThis is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
It's a core principle of democracy that some things will get 'forced' on you.
Only if there is a compelling government interest, especially if it means infringing on a constitutionally protected right, i.e. the free exercise of religion.
Forcing a baker to bake a cake over butthurt is not a compelling government interest.
Yep, discriminating against people who don't want to associate with others based on their behavior.
Behavior has nothing to do with race, religion or net worth so stop trying to attribute word or opinions to me that I haven't expressed.
Derelict_Drvr
Gold Member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 1,115
- 205
- 140
just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....Im in no way doing that. I just said there should be no discrimination from the institution, Mr. illiterate.
Jim Crow was ALLOWED in the South, not necessarily mandated. You want to ALLOW a business to refuse service to people of color. That is your support for allowing Jim Crow to come back.
Racist much?
- Apr 5, 2010
- 81,845
- 33,360
- 2,300
are you fucking serious? do you think gay people were never discriminated against before that stupid bakery story? I suppose you think transexuals were never discriminated against before that bathroom story either?Im guessing you have the sick twisted opinions about race as well, that we shouldn't "use courts to force desegregation on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".From a friend in Wyoming:
The Wyoming State Legislature is considering a bill that, if passed, would become the most oppressive and wide-ranging anti-LGBT law in the nation. It would allow social workers to deny aid, teachers to not teach, health care workers to deny service not only to individuals that identify as LGBT, but their children as well. And that is just part of the bill... this bill tells our LGBT brothers and sisters that they are not worthy to receive services a straight cisgendered individual can receive.
HB-135 is scheduled to be voted upon by the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee this week, its first step toward becoming law. Please call and/or email members of this committee (contact info pasted below) and tell them to VOTE NO ON HB-135. No hate in the equality state!
Remember: Be firm but polite; introduce yourself and say where you're from; make your message personal.
Wyoming House Judiciary Committee -
Dan Kirkbride (Chugwater)
Cell - (307) 331-2265
[email protected]
Mark Baker (Rock Springs)
Cell - (307) 371-5113
[email protected]
Bo Biteman (Ranchester)
Cell - (307) 763-7613
[email protected]
Mark Jennings (Sheridan)
Cell - (307) 461-0697
[email protected]
Jared Olsen (Cheyenne)
Cell - (307) 509-0242
[email protected]
Charles Pelkey (Laramie)
Cell - (307) 920-0542
[email protected]
Bill Pownall (Gillette)
Home - (307) 682-4148
[email protected]
Tim Salazar (Dubois)
Cell - (307) 220-1213
[email protected]
Nathan Winters (Thermopolis)
Home - (307) 864-3690
[email protected]
This is what you get when you use courts to force gay marriage on places that don't want it, and force non-essential businesses to either "bake or die".
When your side becomes unreasonable, don't be surprised when the other side does the exact same thing.
I guess lincoln shouldn't have been surprised when the south revolted after he "unreasonably" outlawed slavery....
Not at all. Desegregation laws were perfectly constitutional and needed, as what was going on in the South was systemic economic discrimination, along with systemic political disenfranchisement, none of which is found in these non essential wedding transactions.
It was a bad court decision that allowed it to flourish, and that decsion has more in common with Roe and Obergfell than any other decisions out there, except maybe Dredd Scott.
passing a law saying you can discriminate against gays is no different than laws saying you can discriminate against blacks. which im sure some republican shithole like alabama will try passing soon as well
that discrimination was never as systemic as racial discrimination in the South, and was not against as large of a population. Gays also had the advantage of "hiding in plain sight" that blacks never had, unless they could "pass".
If some baker didn't want to serve blacks, and there were plenty of bakers around to cover it, why not just let the market handle it?
Nah. Being a leftist traitor does not discriminate by race.Do you mean white leftists?And leftists being leftists.just whites being whiteJust democrats being democrats.....they were still whiteYou mean democrat Jim Crow laws....
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
your a neo nazi all you want to do is discriminate agianst people based on their behavior... and their race, their religon, their general net worthThis has nothing at all to do with religion, that is only used as a smokescreen. Its all about hate and discriminationIt's a core principle of democracy that some things will get 'forced' on you.
Only if there is a compelling government interest, especially if it means infringing on a constitutionally protected right, i.e. the free exercise of religion.
Forcing a baker to bake a cake over butthurt is not a compelling government interest.
Yep, discriminating against people who don't want to associate with others based on their behavior.
Behavior has nothing to do with race, religion or net worth so stop trying to attribute word or opinions to me that I haven't expressed.
Religion is a behavior. Gun ownership and use is a behavior.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
[
If some baker didn't want to serve blacks, and there were plenty of bakers around to cover it, why not just let the market handle it?
Because the market is not obliged to be constitutional, if left to its own devices.
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 170
- Views
- 819
- Replies
- 3K
- Views
- 45K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8296
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-