Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bullshit all 4 of your fantasy clips have been shredded every time you post them .not a single rebuttal to A@E911 TRUTHrightwhat evidence was manufactured,,what data invented..can you support anything you say?You twoofers manufacture an explanation and then invent data to support the conspiracy laden conjecture.its the only way to explain a symmetrical free fall collapse...
Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration", and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.[111]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publication of a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion".[112]
Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry by stating that the theorists "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the 'truthers' cherry-picked a few supposed 'anomalies' to build an 'inside-job' story line".[113]
Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's ex-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous".[114]
Some skeptics, who oppose conspiracy as the a-priori explanation to events, and who find most of the questions posed by the Truthers to be either easily answered[115] or based on misleading or false facts[116] have claimed that some of the Truthers are knowingly disseminating false information, with no care for the grieving families, and accordingly called them "disrespectful" or even "sickos".[117]
just editorial opinion and empty claims that the could be proven wrong with out offering anything to support that claim...FAIL
Nor has there been a SINGLE rebuttal to all those four videos I posted way at the very beginning of this thread despite all my challlenges.they have acted like those videos were never posted.
obviously they have me on their ignore list.
thats why i have them on mine since they ignore all my posts.lol.
poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...
by who ..when ..whereBullshit all 4 of your fantasy clips have been shredded every time you post them .not a single rebuttal to A@E911 TRUTHrightwhat evidence was manufactured,,what data invented..can you support anything you say?You twoofers manufacture an explanation and then invent data to support the conspiracy laden conjecture.
Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration", and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.[111]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publication of a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion".[112]
Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry by stating that the theorists "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the 'truthers' cherry-picked a few supposed 'anomalies' to build an 'inside-job' story line".[113]
Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's ex-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous".[114]
Some skeptics, who oppose conspiracy as the a-priori explanation to events, and who find most of the questions posed by the Truthers to be either easily answered[115] or based on misleading or false facts[116] have claimed that some of the Truthers are knowingly disseminating false information, with no care for the grieving families, and accordingly called them "disrespectful" or even "sickos".[117]
just editorial opinion and empty claims that the could be proven wrong with out offering anything to support that claim...FAIL
Nor has there been a SINGLE rebuttal to all those four videos I posted way at the very beginning of this thread despite all my challlenges.they have acted like those videos were never posted.
obviously they have me on their ignore list.
thats why i have them on mine since they ignore all my posts.lol.
poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...
I see so anyone regardless of expertise and evidence that does not support NIST is a twoofer
and therefore negated
poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...
I see so anyone regardless of expertise and evidence that does not support NIST is a twoofer
and therefore negated
What evidence do you twoofers have for "laser beam" weapons used on 9/11?
poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...
I see so anyone regardless of expertise and evidence that does not support NIST is a twoofer
and therefore negated
What evidence do you twoofers have for "laser beam" weapons used on 9/11?
none, its just some stupid video you posted nothing to do with architects and engineers
A decade and a half of failed twoofer conspiracies won't help you.Hmm...I wonder what conspiracy theories propagated by Popular Mechanics and nist.gov are called.
everybody every time. but since denial is you forte what other answer could I expect.by who ..when ..whereBullshit all 4 of your fantasy clips have been shredded every time you post them .not a single rebuttal to A@E911 TRUTHrightwhat evidence was manufactured,,what data invented..can you support anything you say?
Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration", and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.[111]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publication of a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion".[112]
Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry by stating that the theorists "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the 'truthers' cherry-picked a few supposed 'anomalies' to build an 'inside-job' story line".[113]
Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's ex-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous".[114]
Some skeptics, who oppose conspiracy as the a-priori explanation to events, and who find most of the questions posed by the Truthers to be either easily answered[115] or based on misleading or false facts[116] have claimed that some of the Truthers are knowingly disseminating false information, with no care for the grieving families, and accordingly called them "disrespectful" or even "sickos".[117]
just editorial opinion and empty claims that the could be proven wrong with out offering anything to support that claim...FAIL
Nor has there been a SINGLE rebuttal to all those four videos I posted way at the very beginning of this thread despite all my challlenges.they have acted like those videos were never posted.
obviously they have me on their ignore list.
thats why i have them on mine since they ignore all my posts.lol.
neither does A&E FOR TWOOF
poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...
I see so anyone regardless of expertise and evidence that does not support NIST is a twoofer
and therefore negated
What evidence do you twoofers have for "laser beam" weapons used on 9/11?
none, its just some stupid video you posted nothing to do with architects and engineers
Listen to Bob the Builder played backwards.
and that has what to do with the collapse of building 7 ?
so what you are saying is you are kind of stupidOh, I can't tell if it says "9-11 was an inside job", or "I believe in Bob."
so what you are saying is you are kind of stupidOh, I can't tell if it says "9-11 was an inside job", or "I believe in Bob."
Or maybe she's saying that you are kind of stupid.
Yep, yeppers...LOL...you could not possibly support your belief in the NIST report..so you are left with babbleso what you are saying is you are kind of stupidOh, I can't tell if it says "9-11 was an inside job", or "I believe in Bob."
Or maybe she's saying that you are kind of stupid.
Yep, yeppers!
Yep, yeppers...LOL...you could not possibly support your belief in the NIST report..so you are left with babbleso what you are saying is you are kind of stupidOh, I can't tell if it says "9-11 was an inside job", or "I believe in Bob."
Or maybe she's saying that you are kind of stupid.
Yep, yeppers!
Yep, yeppers...LOL...you could not possibly support your belief in the NIST report..so you are left with babbleso what you are saying is you are kind of stupidOh, I can't tell if it says "9-11 was an inside job", or "I believe in Bob."
Or maybe she's saying that you are kind of stupid.
Yep, yeppers!
Let's see what Alex Jones has to say about this.
