WTC building 7

[Hollie]

its the only way to explain a symmetrical free fall collapse...

You twoofers manufacture an explanation and then invent data to support the conspiracy laden conjecture.

what evidence was manufactured,,what data invented..can you support anything you say?

right

Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration", and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.[111]

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publication of a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion".[112]

Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry by stating that the theorists "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the 'truthers' cherry-picked a few supposed 'anomalies' to build an 'inside-job' story line".[113]

Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's ex-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous".[114]

Some skeptics, who oppose conspiracy as the a-priori explanation to events, and who find most of the questions posed by the Truthers to be either easily answered[115] or based on misleading or false facts[116] have claimed that some of the Truthers are knowingly disseminating false information, with no care for the grieving families, and accordingly called them "disrespectful" or even "sickos".[117]

not a single rebuttal to A@E911 TRUTH
just editorial opinion and empty claims that the could be proven wrong with out offering anything to support that claim...FAIL

Nor has there been a SINGLE rebuttal to all those four videos I posted way at the very beginning of this thread despite all my challlenges.they have acted like those videos were never posted.

obviously they have me on their ignore list.


thats why i have them on mine since they ignore all my posts.lol.

Oh my. The Four Vid

A linguist..lol...your like hollie with her science buff that likes to read sci-fi and fantasy novels

yep,the shills have fantasys that all these credible experts are wrong and the government and media are correct. they wont take my advise and stop smoking that crack they are one.

all they have to come back with in their drivel constantly is this-

What you twoofers fail to understand is that now a decade and a half past 9/11, you goofy conspiracies involving Joooooooos, thermite, Jooooooos with thermite, controlled demolition, Joooooooooos and every other goofy conspiracy involving multiple conspirators remain nothing more than fiction and conspiracy theory.

The above are some of the reasons why you conspiracy theory loons are referred to as, well, conspiracy theory loons.

Not true history is being written, 9/11 truth is becoming common knowledge..its being taught on campus it has gone mainstream

History is surely being written and the twoofers are being recognized as the charlatans and conspiracy theory loons they are.

 

[eots]

 

[Hollie]

You twoofers manufacture an explanation and then invent data to support the conspiracy laden conjecture.

what evidence was manufactured,,what data invented..can you support anything you say?

right

Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone assessed that the movement "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration", and expressed concerns about the number of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.[111]

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineering professor Thomas W. Eagar was at first unwilling to acknowledge the concerns of the movement, saying "if (the argument) gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." In response to Steven E. Jones publication of a hypothesis that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition, Eagar said that adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion".[112]

Calling conspiracy theorists "the truthers", Bill Moyers has quoted journalist Robert Parry by stating that the theorists "...threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda's involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right's sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the 'truthers' cherry-picked a few supposed 'anomalies' to build an 'inside-job' story line".[113]

Al Qaeda has sharply criticized Iran's ex-president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, over his suggestions that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attacks, dismissing his comments as "ridiculous".[114]

Some skeptics, who oppose conspiracy as the a-priori explanation to events, and who find most of the questions posed by the Truthers to be either easily answered[115] or based on misleading or false facts[116] have claimed that some of the Truthers are knowingly disseminating false information, with no care for the grieving families, and accordingly called them "disrespectful" or even "sickos".[117]

not a single rebuttal to A@E911 TRUTH
just editorial opinion and empty claims that the could be proven wrong with out offering anything to support that claim...FAIL

You expect rubuttal to a YouTube video manufactured by twoofers?

Fail!

its a MIT engineer you goofball

An MIT engineer with a failed conspiracy theory.

As usual, none of you Alex Jones groupies have yet addressed the failure of the conspiracy theory loons to substantiate their conspiracies.

A decade and a half later, only a few of you loons are still promoting your silly conspiracies.

 

[Hollie]

 

[eots]

9/11 truth lectures taking place in university across the nation throughout the world in fact

 

[Hollie]

Da' twoof per Twoofer loons.

 

[Hollie]

The twoof of 9/11.

Space aliens supplied the gubmint with laser beams.

 

[Hollie]

 

[eots]

The twoof of 9/11.

Space aliens supplied the gubmint with laser beams.

strawman nothing to do with a@e911truth

 

[eots]

no one said no planes.. another of your strawmen not part of any of these Harvard and MIT professors lectures

 

[Hollie]

no one said no planes.. another of your strawmen not part of any of these Harvard and MIT professors lectures

Strawman. Another of your strawman arguments.

 

[Hollie]

Dis' is da twoof.

 

[eots]

Dis' is da twoof.

might be..I have not viewed it..have you ?..what are the details

 

[Hollie]

 

[eots]

poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...

 

[Hollie]

poor hollie ..all she has is strawman arguments..clearly has lost any reasoned debate her only real purpose is unwittingly keeping WTC truth threads active...

Yet another twoofer conspiracy.

 

[Hollie]

 

[Carla_Danger]

Listen to Bob the Builder played backwards.

 

[Carla_Danger]

It's confirmed. Bob is Illuminati



(One World Order).

 

[daws101]

He's a twoofer his opinion is bias and based on the same false and unprovable premise.
that you are.