Wrong In So Very Many Ways

[PoliticalChic]

I need to share this example of the abject stupidity that government school provides:

“A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.”
The Most Famous Fakes In Science

Clearly, this requires yet another thread to save any other grads who imbibed this sort of ignorance. First, of course, this is not Darwinian nor any other sort of ‘evolution,’ it is metamorphosis; The most astounding metamorphosis is the aquatic tadpole becoming a terrestrial frog. It gives a peek into the range of characteristics embedded in DNA. I gave the link so every can see the sort of imbecile that believes he understands evolution.


What is evolution, and why Darwinism, the doctrine of government schooling, isn't an explanation for evolution.

1.In order to be a devotee of Darwinism, there are two usual requirements:
a. You must be a government school graduate
and
b. You must not have more than a superficial knowledge of evolution, genetics and biochemistry

…and maybe this:
c. You must be pre-programmed to have total faith….faith is the operative term….in the infallibility of the common knowledge.



2. Darwinism? The tenets are simply these:

a. Life began….the origin is not addressed, although Darwin does give credit here to a Creator (I know that puts a burr under the saddle of government school grads):
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.”― Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

b. Darwinism begins from this point, claiming all life, all diversity began from this first simple life…our ‘common ancestor.’ ..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

c. That first organism, and every one following, had random variations, some of which made it better equipped to survive, and so were passed on to succeeding generations, until, finally the totality of the variations resulted in a new, usually more complex, species.



That last line is the crux of the matter, because, although there has never been proof of that event occurring, it is taught in every level of indoctrination….er, schooling, as a proven fact.

You are certainly free to believe Darwinism, but realize it is an article of faith, as in any religion, not of fact.

An intelligent reader would wonder why, then, is it proclaimed as a proven fact? Good question.




3. The first clear indication that Darwin was incorrect is this historical fact: animal breeders have used natural and artificial selection for over four millennia, and while there have often been new and better characteristics in the stock they were breeding, never was a new species produced. That means that the improved organisms….maybe cows that give more milk, or fatter hogs….have always been able to breed with others of the original stock that didn’t show the improvement. As in, you can’t breed horses with hogs.


4. First and foremost is a definition of ‘species.’ In their 2004 book Speciation, evolutionary biologists Jerry A. Coyne and H. Allen Orr found that the most useful definition was that of Harvard evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr’s “Species are groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups.”

If they can interbreed with each other....they are not different species...e.g. the black and white Peppered Moths they lied to you in high school as proving Darwin: same species.



Bet the “is not” brigade, who hate criticism of Darwin, can’t find a single error above.
And, there’s more.

Religionism claims magic and supernaturalism as the cause of existence.

Your claimed 6,000 year old planet, talking snakes, Arks cruising the seas, etc., are full of errors.

Bet ''the gawds did it'' brigade can't find a single supportable but of evidence for their claims.

Evolution claims life miraculously appeared from a primordial soup.
Yet they can replicate it never. True Story.

Life began….the origin is not addressed, although Darwin does give credit here to a Creator (I know that puts a burr under the saddle of government school grads):
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.”― Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

b. Darwinism begins from this point, claiming all life, all diversity began from this first simple life…our ‘common ancestor.’ ..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)



So that's where his theory begins.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I need to share this example of the abject stupidity that government school provides:

“A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.”
The Most Famous Fakes In Science

Clearly, this requires yet another thread to save any other grads who imbibed this sort of ignorance. First, of course, this is not Darwinian nor any other sort of ‘evolution,’ it is metamorphosis; The most astounding metamorphosis is the aquatic tadpole becoming a terrestrial frog. It gives a peek into the range of characteristics embedded in DNA. I gave the link so every can see the sort of imbecile that believes he understands evolution.


What is evolution, and why Darwinism, the doctrine of government schooling, isn't an explanation for evolution.

1.In order to be a devotee of Darwinism, there are two usual requirements:
a. You must be a government school graduate
and
b. You must not have more than a superficial knowledge of evolution, genetics and biochemistry

…and maybe this:
c. You must be pre-programmed to have total faith….faith is the operative term….in the infallibility of the common knowledge.



2. Darwinism? The tenets are simply these:

a. Life began….the origin is not addressed, although Darwin does give credit here to a Creator (I know that puts a burr under the saddle of government school grads):
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.”― Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

b. Darwinism begins from this point, claiming all life, all diversity began from this first simple life…our ‘common ancestor.’ ..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

c. That first organism, and every one following, had random variations, some of which made it better equipped to survive, and so were passed on to succeeding generations, until, finally the totality of the variations resulted in a new, usually more complex, species.



That last line is the crux of the matter, because, although there has never been proof of that event occurring, it is taught in every level of indoctrination….er, schooling, as a proven fact.

You are certainly free to believe Darwinism, but realize it is an article of faith, as in any religion, not of fact.

An intelligent reader would wonder why, then, is it proclaimed as a proven fact? Good question.




3. The first clear indication that Darwin was incorrect is this historical fact: animal breeders have used natural and artificial selection for over four millennia, and while there have often been new and better characteristics in the stock they were breeding, never was a new species produced. That means that the improved organisms….maybe cows that give more milk, or fatter hogs….have always been able to breed with others of the original stock that didn’t show the improvement. As in, you can’t breed horses with hogs.


4. First and foremost is a definition of ‘species.’ In their 2004 book Speciation, evolutionary biologists Jerry A. Coyne and H. Allen Orr found that the most useful definition was that of Harvard evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr’s “Species are groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups.”

If they can interbreed with each other....they are not different species...e.g. the black and white Peppered Moths they lied to you in high school as proving Darwin: same species.



Bet the “is not” brigade, who hate criticism of Darwin, can’t find a single error above.
And, there’s more.

Religionism claims magic and supernaturalism as the cause of existence.

Your claimed 6,000 year old planet, talking snakes, Arks cruising the seas, etc., are full of errors.

Bet ''the gawds did it'' brigade can't find a single supportable but of evidence for their claims.

Evolution claims life miraculously appeared from a primordial soup.
Yet they can replicate it never. True Story.

Life began….the origin is not addressed, although Darwin does give credit here to a Creator (I know that puts a burr under the saddle of government school grads):
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.”― Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

b. Darwinism begins from this point, claiming all life, all diversity began from this first simple life…our ‘common ancestor.’ ..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)



So that's where his theory begins.

Our common ancestor was a man, not a monkey.