The Most Famous Fakes In Science

[PoliticalChic]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

I hope you see the thread I'm going to put up today, called 'Kneel.'

It will explain another concept you are ignorant about......atheists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

 

[Hollie]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

 

[Dagosa]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

Amazing that Darwin was as correct as he was given his technological limitations. The only thing he got close to being wrong was suggesting that in some instances One type of creature could evolve into a say a whale as opposed to another type creature. Seems pretty Acceptable given his evidential limitations. He was remarkably Correct.

 

[Hollie]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

Amazing that Darwin was as correct as he was given his technological limitations. The only thing he got close to being wrong was suggesting that in some instances One type of creature could evolve into a say a whale as opposed to another type creature. Seems pretty Acceptable given his evidential limitations. He was remarkably Correct.

With reference to political chic and her trembling fear of “Darwinism”, it is Darwinism that demonstrated through a catalog of scientific detail the historical fact of evolution (assuming an understanding of the difference between levels of scientific certainty and the theories that explain them). Using fields as diverse as biology, comparative anatomy,selective breeding, geography and animal behavior, Darwin laid out the evidence and formed a working theory that evolution (descent with modification) had actually occurred.

Further, Darwin proposed a theory for explaining what we would learn to define as "Natural Selection." Contrary to the claim by ID’iot creationists / Flat Earthers that "the gawds did it" by magical means as a way to explain the diversity of life on the planet, (completely unsupported and it assumes the requirement for supernaturalism), Natural Selection makes no such requirement and makes no requirement for coincidence or magic. Evolution instead defines the objective criterion of "reproductive fitness" as the completely natural mechanism for driving biological change.

There’s nothing that angers religious extremists more than a natural explanation for life on the planet which contradicts their tales and fables.

 

[PoliticalChic]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

Amazing that Darwin was as correct as he was given his technological limitations. The only thing he got close to being wrong was suggesting that in some instances One type of creature could evolve into a say a whale as opposed to another type creature. Seems pretty Acceptable given his evidential limitations. He was remarkably Correct.

Technical????


You moron.....what experiments did he perform????

His theory is philosophy, theology, not science.

 

[Hollie]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

Amazing that Darwin was as correct as he was given his technological limitations. The only thing he got close to being wrong was suggesting that in some instances One type of creature could evolve into a say a whale as opposed to another type creature. Seems pretty Acceptable given his evidential limitations. He was remarkably Correct.

Technical????


You moron.....what experiments did he perform????

His theory is philosophy, theology, not science.

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

 

[Indeependent]

because science backs up the Bible.

There is no evidence whatsoever ever of that

Just the Big Bang, and the order of events in Genesis.....you moron.

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

Amazing that Darwin was as correct as he was given his technological limitations. The only thing he got close to being wrong was suggesting that in some instances One type of creature could evolve into a say a whale as opposed to another type creature. Seems pretty Acceptable given his evidential limitations. He was remarkably Correct.

Technical????


You moron.....what experiments did he perform????

His theory is philosophy, theology, not science.

Helen Keller had better senses than an atheist.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Okay Indeependent, what was Helen Keller's favorite color?
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
corduroy

/
/
/
/
/
What was her dog's name?
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
RRRRRRNNNNNMMMMMMMMMM

 

[james bond]

Of course you don’t understand , you’re ignorant.
Genetics is the mechanism of evolution and Gregor Mendel work with pea pods became a foundation in the understanding of genetics.

To the contrary, I have read about evolution and creation science, so I know which one is false while you don't. Darwin was a failure with his pangenesis hypothesis as it was wrong. Genetics is not a mechanism for evolution as there is no evolution. OTOH, Gregor Mendel's work with pea pods produced his three laws (Trinity based?) for genetics. You do not even know what these laws covered haha.

To the contrary, I can speak to a roomful of people from different walks of life and make a great case for why creation science has been systematically eliminated from today's evolutionary science and get people to think over what they know as "science" today. For example, why do people think it all started with a big bang?

Basically, Darwin was wrong and he believed in racism with the whites at the top of the racial classes. Just look at the graph. No other races are depicted. Can you hear him screaming in fiery pain in Hades?

 

[james bond]

You have no idea what an athiest is. Define it.

An atheist is a person who has faith that there is no God or gods.

A Christian believes an atheist will burn in hell forever in pain and suffering or something like that based on the Biblical prophecies.

 

[james bond]

The Genesis fable indicates the gods magically created plants before they magically turned on the sun.....“quote” you moron “de-quote”

This is one of the dumbest arguments that atheists make. We know light from the EMS can grow plants. Dumb and atheist should be synonyms. Furthermore, the fable is from the Antibible of evolution. Dagosa tried but failed to convince us the Father Gregor Mendel found the laws of inheritance based on Darwinism. Mendel was no racist and he was motivated by creation science:

" Genetics and evolution have been enemies from the beginning of both concepts. Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics, and Charles Darwin, the father of modern evolution, were contemporaries. At the same time that Darwin was claiming that creatures could change into other creatures, Mendel was showing that even individual characteristics remain constant. While Darwin’s ideas were based on erroneous and untested ideas about inheritance, Mendel’s conclusions were based on careful experimentation. Only by ignoring the total implications of modern genetics has it been possible to maintain the fiction of evolution."

Genetics: no friend of evolution

Creation or evolution? It makes a big difference! Over 10,000 trustworthy articles. Evidence for biblical creation.

creation.com

 

[james bond]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

 

[Taz]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

No it doesn't, you moron.

It IS the butterfly.


This is not a subject you can handle.

 

[Indeependent]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

There's a difference between transforming and evolving.

 

[Indeependent]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

Address my question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

There's a difference between transforming and evolving.

The most astounding metamorphosis is the aquatic tadpole becoming a terrestrial frog.


It give a peek into the range of characteristics embedded in DNA.

 

[Taz]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

No it doesn't, you moron.

It IS the butterfly.


This is not a subject you can handle.

It’s a wormy thing that evolves into a flying thing. You lose Kimchick.

 

[Taz]

“Quote” you moron.....”de-Quote”

experiments performed by darwin - Google Search

As usual, no explanation from Hollie and nothing to demonstrate evolution happens.

It's too bad fairy tales don't happen in the real world.

A caterpillar evolves into a butterfly.

There's a difference between transforming and evolving.

You think that one species can’t change into another. Here, a wormy thing changes into a flying thing.