Would you hit it?

[Roudy]

Chelsea Manning Poses in a Red Bathing Suit for Vogue: 'Guess This Is What Freedom Looks Like'

After how many takes did they get he she it to look like that?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Like this:
View attachment 145301

Unless I'm mistaken, that's a Garand. Fantastic weapon.

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

As a foot note the file is titled:
Army Sniper Mosul Iraq
Dated 11/23/2004

I saved it cause I liked it.

Does that make me a bad person?

 

[martybegan]

Like this:
View attachment 145301

Unless I'm mistaken, that's a Garand. Fantastic weapon.

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

I have to say this is a first, a thread derailed by gun talk that was originally about someone having their "gun: removed.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Not when it smells like balls, no.

 

[westwall]

Unless I'm mistaken, that's a Garand. Fantastic weapon.

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

As a foot note the file is titled:
Army Sniper Mosul Iraq
Dated 11/23/2004

I saved it cause I liked it.

Does that make me a bad person?

View attachment 145428

Nope!

 

[IsaacNewton]

Conservatives have a perv gene about sex. They have some weird preoccupation with other people and their activity behind closed doors. Normal people think 'huh that's different' then move on. Not cons. They think about that shit all the time and it is so creepy.

 

[monkrules]

View attachment 145330

Come on....You know you want it. LolLolLol....

Just say it - your prefer bradley

Naw, I think they're both just as nasty...

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

View attachment 145330

Come on....You know you want it. LolLolLol....

Just say it - your prefer bradley

Naw, I think they're both just as nasty...

if you had to do one

which would you pick?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Conservatives have a perv gene about sex. They have some weird preoccupation with other people and their activity behind closed doors. Normal people think 'huh that's different' then move on. Not cons. They think about that shit all the time and it is so creepy.

Like you and that cow - that was cray cray bro

 

[JGalt]

Like this:
View attachment 145301

Unless I'm mistaken, that's a Garand. Fantastic weapon.

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

 

[JGalt]

Conservatives have a perv gene about sex. They have some weird preoccupation with other people and their activity behind closed doors. Normal people think 'huh that's different' then move on. Not cons. They think about that shit all the time and it is so creepy.

Nice projecting. It isn't we conservatives who are constantly babbling on about "gay rights", transsexuals, "all-inclusiveness", "same-sex bathrooms", "tolerance", and "diversity".

On the contrary: It's you liberals who have a weird fascination with perversions and the sexually-dysfunctional.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Conservatives have a perv gene about sex. They have some weird preoccupation with other people and their activity behind closed doors. Normal people think 'huh that's different' then move on. Not cons. They think about that shit all the time and it is so creepy.

Nice projecting. It isn't we conservatives who are constantly babbling on about "gay rights", transsexuals, "all-inclusiveness", "same-sex bathrooms", "tolerance", and "diversity".

On the contrary: It's you liberals who have a weird fascination with perversions and the sexually-dysfunctional.

Ah a teaching moment. See the rest of us think all these people have inalienable rights that are self evident. We don't care what they do behind closed doors.

But you do. You think about it all the time and talk about it all the time. Sorry Gary, you've been outed.

 

[Marion Morrison]

With a baseball bat! Really when it comes to that one, I think about rope.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Melania has nice cheek bones, I wouldn't mind waking up next to her sleeping.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Well, it is this persons choice and who cares if you would or not.

Stop dictating your dumb religious bs on other people.

 

[westwall]

Unless I'm mistaken, that's a Garand. Fantastic weapon.

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

The M1A is the civilian version of the M-14. ALL M-14's are select fire. Firing them on full auto is a bit like riding a crazy woman, the BAR though is a very mild recoil. It's almost double the weight of the M-14 so that helps mitigate recoil immensely.

 

[Marion Morrison]

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

The M1A is the civilian version of the M-14. ALL M-14's are select fire. Firing them on full auto is a bit like riding a crazy woman, the BAR though is a very mild recoil. It's almost double the weight of the M-14 so that helps mitigate recoil immensely.

It's silliness to fire m14 full auto
, however, the action is nice and tight and it is very accurate.

Why Ruger Mini-14 no so accurate?

 

[JGalt]

You are, it's an M-14.

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

The M1A is the civilian version of the M-14. ALL M-14's are select fire. Firing them on full auto is a bit like riding a crazy woman, the BAR though is a very mild recoil. It's almost double the weight of the M-14 so that helps mitigate recoil immensely.

True. Thinking about the BAR's weight, I guess it wouldn't be all that much recoil. There's a VFW hall two towns over that has an authentic WW2 era BAR, along with a Thompson, and several Enfields and Springfields in a display case. Of course, the BAR and Thompson has had the barrels welded shut.

Coolest thing I saw was at another VFW hall near here. It was a WW2 Japanese Type 92 heavy machine gun sitting in a cubby hole in the corner. The thing would have taken three Japanese soldiers to carry it, no idea how it got to the states. There seems to be a lot of surplus equipment in this state. Every city park has a vintage piece of artillery or a tank.

That being said, the OP is a "mehh, don't care about that freak". Better to hijack my own post and discuss something more interesting.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

The M1A is the civilian version of the M-14. ALL M-14's are select fire. Firing them on full auto is a bit like riding a crazy woman, the BAR though is a very mild recoil. It's almost double the weight of the M-14 so that helps mitigate recoil immensely.

True. Thinking about the BAR's weight, I guess it wouldn't be all that much recoil. There's a VFW hall two towns over that has an authentic WW2 era BAR, along with a Thompson, and several Enfields and Springfields in a display case. Of course, the BAR and Thompson has had the barrels welded shut.

Coolest thing I saw was at another VFW hall near here. It was a WW2 Japanese Type 92 heavy machine gun sitting in a cubby hole in the corner. The thing would have taken three Japanese soldiers to carry it, no idea how it got to the states. There seems to be a lot of surplus equipment in this state. Every city park has a vintage piece of artillery or a tank.

That being said, the OP is a "mehh, don't care about that freak". Better to hijack my own post and discuss something more interesting.

A lot of things made their way back to the states back in the day. Put on plane, ship home to wife, done.

 

[westwall]

I've shot my brother's Garand a few times. The rear sight is just like that. But the M-1 is a bolt action and that one is not. Not a Garand but still a nice looking weapon.

That's a SOCOM M1A. Pretty much the same thing as the M-14. Which is pretty much the same thing as an M-1 Garand, except it's in 7.72X51 (308) instead of 30-06. The M1A is also a little shorter than the Garand, and it takes a 20-round box magazine instead of the Garand's 8-round en block clip.

Then there's the 30 caliber M1 carbine. The M1A, Garand, and M1 carbine all have the same rotating-bolt design, so they all look similar.

Nope. It's an M-14. He replaced the top cover on it and put some doo dads etc, but you can see the select fire lever at the rear of the receiver and the barrel is still full length.

Ok, I see that now. Full-auto version of the M1A, right? Not sure if I'd want to shoulder a full-auto 7.62X51, but we did have the 30-06 Browning Automatic Rifle back in WW2. Those things had to kick like a mule.

The M1A is the civilian version of the M-14. ALL M-14's are select fire. Firing them on full auto is a bit like riding a crazy woman, the BAR though is a very mild recoil. It's almost double the weight of the M-14 so that helps mitigate recoil immensely.

It's silliness to fire m14 full auto
, however, the action is nice and tight and it is very accurate.

Why Ruger Mini-14 no so accurate?

Crappy barrels. They are cheap and cheap is never good.