- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,109
- 53,723
- 2,605
well, I guess that's true..Many scientists are students.Not to be sour grapes but one of the "Scientists" is a student..
I will wait.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
well, I guess that's true..Many scientists are students.Not to be sour grapes but one of the "Scientists" is a student..
I will wait.
Try tens of millions of years ago.but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.
I say we came from Antarctica. Now, that would be funny.Try tens of millions of years ago.but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.
Try tens of millions of years ago.but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.
I have always thought that several of the many races developed in parallel due to the type of climate that they lived in. Also the interbreeding shows some influence. The main reason that the investigators think what they think is that the oldest bones found are in the areas of Africa. As must of you know that ideas change as data is discovered.This means Africa was just the home of failed species and evolutionary dead ends which survived there because of an easy existence in a warm climate.
www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
Calif is going to drop off into the sea, say it true and put my mind to rest.Try tens of millions of years ago.but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.
The continents are still moving. Not sure what you think was going on tens of millions of years ago.
Not to many years ago they said that the first known female was found in China. Boy she got around.............God this color is gay.So everybody has been looking in Africa, but it just isn't working because of the molar root structure that they have. They say in this study that there really isn't that much information, but what information they DO have is not necessarily pointing to Africa and in fact seems to point more to these other areas, where they DO have some lineage evidence, based on this molar root structure fossil record.
"The overwhelming effort to reconstruct hominin origins have been focused on the African continent. However, ancestral lineages remain largely unknown [16]. A crucial problem in identifying ancestral lineages is the prevalence of homoplasy and the relative lack of derived morphological features that reduces the phylogenetic resolution around lineage divergence [17, 18]. Root morphology might be a potential feature, which is less affected by homoplasy. Studies on fossil hominids, extant great apes and humans indicate that the premolar root number is not primarily linked to a functional adaptation, and is interpreted to represent a genetic polymorphism [19, 20]. Hence, homoplasy is only a minor consideration for the traits of premolar root numbers, which therefore may provide a useful phylogenetic signal. "
"In this study, we propose based on root morphology a new possible candidate for the hominin clade, Graecopithecus freybergi from Europe. Graecopithecus is known from a single mandible from Pyrgos Vassilissis Amalia (Athens, Greece) [38] and possibly from an isolated upper fourth premolar (P4) from Azmaka in Bulgaria [39] (Fig 1A and 1B). A new age model for the localities Pyrgos Vassilissis and Azmaka, as well as the investigations on the fauna of these localities [40] confirms that European hominids thrived in the early Messinian (Late Miocene, 7.25–6 Ma) and therefore existed in Europe ~ 1.5 Ma later than previously thought [39]. This, and recent discoveries from Çorakyerler (Turkey), and Maragheh (Iran) demonstrate the persistence of Miocene hominids into the Turolian (~8 Ma) in Europe, the eastern Mediterranean, and Western Asia [41, 42]."
Potential hominin affinities of Graecopithecus from the Late Miocene of Europe
I could be wrong here, but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.While you are in there take on for me.LOL
Now when or where present Europe was in the time human beings first stood up right is perhaps impossible to know.
Then again if anyone can identify the rate that the continents drift, then they could make a pretty good educated guess.
Bottom line is Antarctica was at one time where the equator is now. There are ancient sea fossils at the top or Mount Everest.
Funny stuff. Anything though that can fuck with a liberal, I am all for. Just to watch their fucking responses. Such music.
I am going for a piss.
I already knew that due to my White superior intellect. I was emphasizing to The Owl that a few hundred thousand years ago on a geological time clock, the continents were basically in the same place they are today.Try tens of millions of years ago.but where the continents are now was not where they were a few hundred thousand years ago.
The continents are still moving .