Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry Winter. I have reached a point of revulsion that I cannot deal with. Thomas Knight was a low life, but apparently not that much lower than you.
Sick fuck!But do keep pushing the idea that the death penalty saves prison guards. I especially like it when you posted the story about the guy on death row killing a guard.
Sick fuck!But do keep pushing the idea that the death penalty saves prison guards. I especially like it when you posted the story about the guy on death row killing a guard.
There are truly no other words. You actually like that instead of being abhorred?!
These are people that do the jobs you and I would not want to do because they need to make a buck and not sponge off the governemt.
That's sick!
What I said about he mental health claim is that is the typical go to argument used by bleeding hearts. Since you jumped straight to it, more proof that you're a bleeding heart.
It proves nothing. You brought up a specific case. And in that case, the murderer's mental health was an issue. I didn't invent that opr bring it up except as a fact about the case you introduced into the discussion.
That example proves two things: 1) You really don't mean unless we know for sure and 2) You're a bleeding heart that jumped straight to the bleeding heart line of excuses.
LMAO!! It really is important to you that I am a bleeding heart, isn't it?
You were there for her trial. Was her mental health brought up as a mitigating factor???
It's important that you realize it.
I don't remember specific testimony as it's been 20 years. I'm sure it was and suspect it was in the sense of being an EXCUSE.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
“The additional cost of confining an inmate to death row, as compared to the maximum security prisons where those sentenced to life without possibility of parole ordinarily serve their sentences, is $90,000 per year per inmate. With California’s current death row population of 670, that accounts for $63.3 million annually.”
So, in addition to the much higher costs of the trial, the yearly costs of keeping an inmate on death row is much higher.
It proves nothing. You brought up a specific case. And in that case, the murderer's mental health was an issue. I didn't invent that opr bring it up except as a fact about the case you introduced into the discussion.
That example proves two things: 1) You really don't mean unless we know for sure and 2) You're a bleeding heart that jumped straight to the bleeding heart line of excuses.
LMAO!! It really is important to you that I am a bleeding heart, isn't it?
You were there for her trial. Was her mental health brought up as a mitigating factor???
It's important that you realize it.
I don't remember specific testimony as it's been 20 years. I'm sure it was and suspect it was in the sense of being an EXCUSE.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
That example proves two things: 1) You really don't mean unless we know for sure and 2) You're a bleeding heart that jumped straight to the bleeding heart line of excuses.
LMAO!! It really is important to you that I am a bleeding heart, isn't it?
You were there for her trial. Was her mental health brought up as a mitigating factor???
It's important that you realize it.
I don't remember specific testimony as it's been 20 years. I'm sure it was and suspect it was in the sense of being an EXCUSE.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Except the judge and jury were there every day.
“The additional cost of confining an inmate to death row, as compared to the maximum security prisons where those sentenced to life without possibility of parole ordinarily serve their sentences, is $90,000 per year per inmate. With California’s current death row population of 670, that accounts for $63.3 million annually.”
So, in addition to the much higher costs of the trial, the yearly costs of keeping an inmate on death row is much higher.
Which is why we need a mandatory sentencibg and single appeal system for all violent crimes. Then a 24 hour window dor execution.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
Do you know why David Berkowitz didn't get the death penalty? The reason has nothing to do with equality so a comparison with Susan Smith is a moot point. When you figure it out, you may understand why you can't compare the two.
LMAO!! It really is important to you that I am a bleeding heart, isn't it?
You were there for her trial. Was her mental health brought up as a mitigating factor???
It's important that you realize it.
I don't remember specific testimony as it's been 20 years. I'm sure it was and suspect it was in the sense of being an EXCUSE.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Except the judge and jury were there every day.
How do them being there every day change the facts of what she admitted to doing. There is no question whether or not she did it. There is also no question that your opposition to the death penalty has nothing to do with whether or not we know without a doubt the person did it as you implied earlier. You simply don't like the death penalty and will come up with any excuse to not support it even in the clearest of cases.
I don't care if you have a different opinion just be honest enough to admit it.
It's important that you realize it.
I don't remember specific testimony as it's been 20 years. I'm sure it was and suspect it was in the sense of being an EXCUSE.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Except the judge and jury were there every day.
How do them being there every day change the facts of what she admitted to doing. There is no question whether or not she did it. There is also no question that your opposition to the death penalty has nothing to do with whether or not we know without a doubt the person did it as you implied earlier. You simply don't like the death penalty and will come up with any excuse to not support it even in the clearest of cases.
I don't care if you have a different opinion just be honest enough to admit it.
How does not being there every day change the facts?? You made the claim "Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard". Unless you were there every day, you obviously didn't hear everything the jury heard.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
Do you know why David Berkowitz didn't get the death penalty? The reason has nothing to do with equality so a comparison with Susan Smith is a moot point. When you figure it out, you may understand why you can't compare the two.
Oh I know why. But it balances the gender claim. Any evidence that Susan Smith was not executed solely because she is a woman?
So your eagerness to execute would have caused the death of 56 innocent people, while it may or may not have saved some of the prison guards. Because not all of the 24 were murdered by people convicted of a capital crime.
So your suspicions should outweigh what the judge and the jury heard and thought? Interesting concept there.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Except the judge and jury were there every day.
How do them being there every day change the facts of what she admitted to doing. There is no question whether or not she did it. There is also no question that your opposition to the death penalty has nothing to do with whether or not we know without a doubt the person did it as you implied earlier. You simply don't like the death penalty and will come up with any excuse to not support it even in the clearest of cases.
I don't care if you have a different opinion just be honest enough to admit it.
How does not being there every day change the facts?? You made the claim "Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard". Unless you were there every day, you obviously didn't hear everything the jury heard.
I didn't have to hear everything to know she was guilty of 1st degree murder and that warrants the death penalty. You heard none of it yet you made the determination that she had mental problems. On what do you base that claim?
So your eagerness to execute would have caused the death of 56 innocent people, while it may or may not have saved some of the prison guards. Because not all of the 24 were murdered by people convicted of a capital crime.
There are NO innocent people in the world. Not even you or me. They may not have been guilty of what they were charged with but they were not innocent. If nothing else they're guilty of not being able to provide a reasonable alibi for themselves and/or failing to acquire proper representation.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
Do you know why David Berkowitz didn't get the death penalty? The reason has nothing to do with equality so a comparison with Susan Smith is a moot point. When you figure it out, you may understand why you can't compare the two.
Oh I know why. But it balances the gender claim. Any evidence that Susan Smith was not executed solely because she is a woman?
Wrong. Has nothing to do with gender.
Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard.
Except the judge and jury were there every day.
How do them being there every day change the facts of what she admitted to doing. There is no question whether or not she did it. There is also no question that your opposition to the death penalty has nothing to do with whether or not we know without a doubt the person did it as you implied earlier. You simply don't like the death penalty and will come up with any excuse to not support it even in the clearest of cases.
I don't care if you have a different opinion just be honest enough to admit it.
How does not being there every day change the facts?? You made the claim "Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard". Unless you were there every day, you obviously didn't hear everything the jury heard.
I didn't have to hear everything to know she was guilty of 1st degree murder and that warrants the death penalty. You heard none of it yet you made the determination that she had mental problems. On what do you base that claim?
First you said "Those of us who attended it heard what the jury heard". Now you say you didn't need to hear it all?
The jury and the judge did not give her the death penalty. You were not there every day and did not hear what they heard.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
Do you know why David Berkowitz didn't get the death penalty? The reason has nothing to do with equality so a comparison with Susan Smith is a moot point. When you figure it out, you may understand why you can't compare the two.
Oh I know why. But it balances the gender claim. Any evidence that Susan Smith was not executed solely because she is a woman?
Wrong. Has nothing to do with gender.
Then it doesn't apply to this topic at all.
Since the actual topic, before being derailled, was about equality and not the death penalty, here is a simple reply to using Susan Smith as a singular example. David Berkowitz murdered 6 people (more than Susan Smith) and was not given the death penalty. So equality does not seem to be the issue.
The OP seemed sure that the protests of the execution of the woman in GA was because she was a woman. But when it was pointed out that every execution in the US is protested, he tried to derail his own thread.
Do you know why David Berkowitz didn't get the death penalty? The reason has nothing to do with equality so a comparison with Susan Smith is a moot point. When you figure it out, you may understand why you can't compare the two.
Oh I know why. But it balances the gender claim. Any evidence that Susan Smith was not executed solely because she is a woman?
Wrong. Has nothing to do with gender.
