Its weird how people think clothing has anything to do with rape.
Hoiw is that weird? Remember, 1 in 5 rape victims are between the ages of 18 and 21. While women over the age of 50 over the age of 50 make up less than 3% of rape victims.
Its ludicrous to conclude the sexual attraction plays no role in rape. It defines reason. And requires elaborate, baseless narratives to explain away overwhelming evidence that supports the idea of a sexual component in rape.
Remember your 'out and about' excuse for why the average rape victim's age is the lowest of any major violent crime? Occam's Razor is a useful tool here.
Again I didnt say it played no role. However, sex is just a tool to achieve power and control. The aim is not to have sex. Its to exercise power. Pretending its about sex is like saying people eat ice cream so they can get ice cream stains on their shirts. Can a person get some stains? Yes. However, thats not why they eat the ice cream.
If it plays a role, then your entire 'defies reason' argument just left a brown streak on the bowl as it went down the toilet. As even with sexual attraction being a secondary motivation provocative clothing would be far more likely to attract a rapist's attention.
And yet you've gone to absurd lengths creating baseless 'alternate explanations' for why rape skews toward younger women to an almost ludicrous degree.....just to avoid this obvious conclusion.
If a cow had nuts it would be a bull. Some people get aroused by power. Thats why people fully clothed get raped. Has nothing to do with attracting a rapists eye because of clothing. If you look like easy prey then that will attract a rapist. if your conclusion made sense then only prostitutes and skanks would get raped.
And some people are aroused by power.....and brunettes. Again, why must any rapist be this caracature that is motivated by ONLY one factor and can never have any other competing interest?
There's nothing mutually exclusive about this. A man can get off on power.....and be into 23 year olds. It doesn't have to be one or the other. It doesn't have to be only those two. It can be a myriad of reasons.
It defies reason to conclude that in defiance of ANY other human experience which is a mishmashh of multiple purposes, conflicting and competing interests........that rape is pristinely pure, singular event in which nothing intrudes nor ever could intrude, and only one note can ever be hit, regardless of person, place or circumstances.
That's ridiculous. People aren't that simple. And you don't make women safer by pretending rapists are cardboard cartoon caricatures.