Woman jailed in UK for using the term ******

[Deadstick]

.

As recently as 2005, I saw a character on the Northern English soap opera, Coronation Street, use the term "***" to refer to a cigarette.

They sure are getting testy.

.

Yes that is what the term meant since i was a kid, or sometimes a Cig, words have been hijacked over the years like Gay.

 

[Meathead]

Yes that is what the term meant since i was a kid, or sometimes a Cig, words have been hijacked over the years like Gay.

I prefer "poofter". It's a bit more descriptive.

 

[JGalt]

Someone gets jailed for using the term "******", and then the UK Miss England crowns a girl who probably pukes at the thought of having sex with a man. Oh the irony.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style...nd-lesbian-grace-richardson-comment-f6vk9txrz

Would she be a "fagette"?

 

[Deadstick]

I prefer "poofter". It a bit more descriptive.

Times change that word is not politically correct these days, in the past Homosexuals were called Pansies or queers, i believe in live and let live and not discriminate against anyone, but then again i don't want gay culture shoved down my throat if you will pardon the expression, we have a lot of it on TV at the moment in soaps and other programmes.

 

[JGalt]

Your side wants to execute people for saying “soldiers shouldn’t follow illegal orders”.

So you really are just insane.

Imagine the irony if those people saying “soldiers shouldn’t follow illegal orders” were executed for treason by soldiers following illegal orders.

Wouldn't that be tastefully ironic?

 

[Meathead]

Times change that word is not politically correct these days, in the past Homosexuals were called Pansies or queers, i believe in live and let live and not discriminate against anyone, but then again i don't want gay culture shoved down my throat if you will pardon the expression, we have a lot of it on TV at the moment in soaps and other programmes.

Wonder if this song, by none other than the great Frank Zappa, would be cancelled today:

 

[Lisa558]

To the UK, I say -

View attachment 1188723

They’re worse than that!

 

[Papageorgio]

Almost none of this is true. Restrictions were in every state, not just blue states. Not unconstitutional. You can order troops to get vaccines. We have for a very long time. Not unconstitutional. Social media companies get to dictate what people can post. Not unconstitutional.

I never made that claim. I said he talked about it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/20/us/politics/trump-democrats-sedition-death-punishment.html

For the military religious exemption rulings.
5th Cir. opinion — U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden (Feb 2022):
https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/22/22-10077-CV0.pdf

Supreme Court partial-stay order (No. 21A477, Mar 25, 2022):
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a477_1bo2.pdf

6th Cir. opinion — Doster v. Kendall (Sept 9, 2022):
https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/22a0213p-06.pdf

For the denying religions the right to assemble, the problem there was in blue states, the government treated religion as of lesser importance which is a 1st Amendment right.

1. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo (2020 → still cited 2021–2024)
Ruling: New York’s COVID rules violated the First Amendment by capping religious services at 10–25 people while allowing secular businesses to operate at higher capacities.
Supreme Court ruling (PDF):

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_3f14.pdf

This case became the foundation for all later COVID/free-exercise rulings.

2. Tandon v. Newsom (2021)
Ruling: California violated the First Amendment by banning in-home religious meetings while allowing hair salons, retail stores, and other secular activities.
Supreme Court ruling (PDF): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
Court quote:
“Government regulations are unconstitutional if they treat religious exercise less favorably than comparable secular activity.”

3. South Bay Pentecostal Church v. Newsom (2021)
Ruling: California could NOT impose harsher rules on churches than secular venues.
Supreme Court order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a136_bq7c.pdf


As far as Trump infringing on the 1st Amendment, where is the evidence? I admit I have issues with Trump and the 1st Amendment to be sure but you made a claim that Trump is attacking the 1st Amendment, give us a solid.

 

[Deadstick]

Wonder if this song, by none other than the great Frank Zappa, would be cancelled today:

Maybe,

 

[Litwin]

Xhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37356128/mum-convicted-hate-crime-text-attacker/

She sent a text message to a “friend” using the term ****** in reference to a male that she claimed attacked her

The “friend” ratted her out to the british police who arrested her

She was charged with a hate crime, fined, imprisoned and assessed 72 hours community service after release

Britain has truly lost its mind

1)
The Sentence: She was given a 12-month community order, including 72 hours of unpaid work and 10 rehabilitation activity days, and was ordered to pay £364 in costs and a surcharge

nothing compere to "hate"- crimes in Moscow empire :

Thread 'In Moscow emire , a 75-year-old pensioner was convicted for calling Stalin a dictator and a murderer. was Stalin a bloody dictator ?'

Aug 19, 2025

moscovia jailing a 75-year-old for telling the truth about stalin(koba), a classic move from an evil empire built on lies , colonialism and terror.

• Litwin

2) UK gay community ´d step it , THIS conviction is wrong, + she´d get a better lawyer

3) She is ******* super hot milf, she will do just fine, much better than most of our forums´members

 

[SweetTea]

So you think soldiers should commit crimes because "they were only following orders?"

Congrats, you just exonerated all the Nazis.

If these Democrat politicians think these orders are illegal, let them take it to court. Telling individual teenagers to disobey what they perceive to be illegal orders, as dictated to them by these Democratic politicians, is irresponsible and you know it.

 

[Lesh]

If the Democrat politicians think these orders are illegal, let them take it to court. Telling individual teenagers to disobey what they perceive to be illegal orders, as dictated to them by Democratic politicians, is irresponsible and you know it.

Telling teenagers to “kill em all” is fucked up on so many levels

 

[SweetTea]

Trump said put to death.

If soldiers are given illegal orders, they shouldn’t follow them. The law has their back and Dems have the law’s back.

They said nothing about “perceive”. You’re putting words in their mouths.

The orders must be patently illegal. Just because some Democratic politician says they are doesn't make them so.

 

[Lesh]

The orders must be patently illegal. Just because some Democratic politician says they are doesn't make them so.

So you think “kill em all” is in any way ambiguous?

 

[SweetTea]

Telling teenagers to “kill em all” is fucked up on so many levels

If a boat was headed to the US carrying several bombs meant to kill Americans, I don't think many would have a problem with blowing up the boat and killing everyone on board. How are chemical weapons, like fentanyl, any different than bombs? They have the same net effect.

 

[SweetTea]

So you think “kill em all” is in any way ambiguous?

No, it isn't and it shouldn't be ambiguous or in question. A group of people coming to the US to deliver chemical weapons meant to kill Americans should be killed. All of them.

 

[Lesh]

If a boat was headed to the US carrying several bombs meant to kill Americans, I don't think many would have a problem with blowing up the boat and killing everyone on board. How are chemical weapons, like fentanyl, any different than bombs? They have the same net effect.

A. These boats were not carrying bombs or WMD chems (this is starting to sound familiar huh folks).
B. “Killing everyone on board” is not only unnecessary but illegal

In fact no evidence has been produced that they carrying fentanyl. It might just as well have been cocaine or something else entirely

 

[SweetTea]

These boats were not carrying bombs or WMD chems (this is starting to sound familiar huh folks).

Fentanyl, when delivered in this manner, is most certainly a chemical weapon.

Killing everyone on board” is not only unnecessary but illegal

Take it to court and see. It isn't illegal just because leftist criminal sympathathizers say it is.

 

[Lesh]

Fentanyl, when delivered in this manner, is most certainly a chemical weapon.



Take it to court and see. It isn't illegal just because leftist criminal sympathathizers say it is.

“When delivered on this manner”
A. It makes no difference whether it’s delivered by boat or rickshaw

B. Still no evidence that there actually WAS fentanyl on those boats and not coke

C. Naval interdiction is the correct and normal way to deal with a n issue like that

D. Kill em all … is a crime any way you look at it

 

[SweetTea]

When delivered on this manner

Fentanyl is used in a medical setting as a pain killer. That is what I was referring to.

Still no evidence that there actually WAS fentanyl on those boats and not coke

So cocaine is ok?

You guys live in a different world than us normal folks.