Woman jailed in UK for using the term ******

[Marener]

The orders must be patently illegal. Just because some Democratic politician says they are doesn't make them so.

Just because Trump says they’re legal doesn’t make them so.

You can tell how authoritarian this administration is by the scale of their freak out over any challenge to their authority. Trump is having a huge freak out because he’s a huge authoritarian.

 

[SweetTea]

Just because Trump says they’re legal doesn’t make them so.

You can tell how authoritarian this administration is by the scale of their freak out over any challenge to their authority. Trump is having a huge freak out because he’s a huge authoritarian.

Every order should be heavily scrutinized by every grunt. If they feel an order is illegal, then we can have trials to determine if it is the case or not. Yeah, that seems like it would work really well. Tall about paralysis and an impotent military.

Orders like the boat destructions are vetted at the top levels before getting to the guy pushing the button.

 

[Marener]

Every order should be heavily scrutinized by every grunt. If they feel an order is illegal, then we can have trials to determine if it is the case or not. Yeah, that seems like it would work really well. Tall about paralysis and an impotent military.

Orders like the boat destructions are vetted at the top levels before getting to the guy pushing the button.

So you’re saying orders are legal because Trump says they’re legal.

Yeah, that seems like if will work really well.

 

[SweetTea]

So you’re saying orders are legal because Trump says they’re legal.

Yeah, that seems like if will work really well.

I am saying if you want.to challenge them, take it to court. Instructing grunts not to follow orders which have not be determined to be illegal is very dangerous.

 

[Lesh]

Fentanyl is used in a medical setting as a pain killer. That is what I was referring to.



So cocaine is ok?

You guys live in a different world than us normal folks.

No cocaine is not ok.

It’s also not the excuse used for blowing up these boats

Keep up

 

[Lesh]

Every order should be heavily scrutinized by every grunt. If they feel an order is illegal, then we can have trials to determine if it is the case or not. Yeah, that seems like it would work really well. Tall about paralysis and an impotent military.

Orders like the boat destructions are vetted at the top levels before getting to the guy pushing the button.

Orders like “killem all” need no scrutiny

That’s patently illegal

 

[Marener]

I am saying if you want.to challenge them, take it to court. Instructing grunts not to follow orders which have not be determined to be illegal is very dangerous.

You’re implying orders are always legal because they’ve been “scrutinized” at the top level. Since Trump is the top level, then you’re implying that they’re legal because he says so.

That’s very silly.

There’s nothing wrong with pointing out that illegal orders shouldn’t be followed, but here we see Trump sending the federal government to harass people for saying so.

You should have a problem with that.

 

[Ringo]

An 85-year-old woman has been arrested in the UK under terrorism laws.
She was holding a sign saying she was against genocide in Palestine.

The UK is a prison, the biggest in Europe

 

[Captain Caveman]

Xhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37356128/mum-convicted-hate-crime-text-attacker/

She sent a text message to a “friend” using the term ****** in reference to a male that she claimed attacked her

The “friend” ratted her out to the british police who arrested her

She was charged with a hate crime, fined, imprisoned and assessed 72 hours community service after release

Britain has truly lost its mind

Link not working.

 

[Mac-7]

Link not working.

Try

Mum who branded 'attacker' a 'f****t' in rant to pal is CONVICTED of hate crime

A MUM-of-four who branded her alleged attacker a “f****t” in a rant to her pal has been convicted of a hate crime. Elizabeth Kinney sent a “barrage” of messages to describe …

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[SweetTea]

Orders like “killem all” need no scrutiny

That’s patently illegal

No it isn’t.

Saying “kill em all” may hurt your feelings, but it is not illegal. It all depends on the circumstances.

 

[Lesh]

No it isn’t.

Saying “kill em all” may hurt your feelings, but it is not illegal. It all depends on the circumstances.

It is absolutely a war crime

 

[Papageorgio]

Marener What 1st amendment issues has Trump attacked?

 

[Marener]

Marener What 1st amendment issues has Trump attacked?

An example.

Law Firms v. Trump Administration

knightcolumbia.org

 

[Papageorgio]

An example.

Law Firms v. Trump Administration

knightcolumbia.org

Thank you, the site also shows how much Biden attacked the 1st, which you claimed he did not.

Search

knightcolumbia.org

 

[Marener]

Thank you, the site also shows how much Biden attacked the 1st, which you claimed he did not.

Search

knightcolumbia.org

What does that have to do with your question?

 

[Papageorgio]

What does that have to do with your question?

You claimed Biden did nothing to infringe, I said he did and it doesn’t matter who the President, is we need to make sure our 1st Amendment are protected no matter who is in office, not just Trump, not just Republicans but ALL regardless of politics. Trump, Biden, Obama, Bush Clinton and on down the line have tried to impose on our 1st Amendment and focusing on just one is partisan bigoted BS.

 

[Marener]

You claimed Biden did nothing to infringe, I said he did and it doesn’t matter who the President, is we need to make sure our 1st Amendment are protected no matter who is in office, not just Trump, not just Republicans but ALL regardless of politics. Trump, Biden, Obama, Bush Clinton and on down the line have tried to impose on our 1st Amendment and focusing on just one is partisan bigoted BS.

You said that Biden did far worse than Trump, but I find that to be a pretty ridiculous statement.

The search you offered criticizes Biden for containing monitoring of social media of visa applicants.

Fair criticism.

Trump is literally arresting visa holders for authoring opinion articles he doesn’t like.

 

[Papageorgio]

You said that Biden did far worse than Trump, but I find that to be a pretty ridiculous statement.

The search you offered criticizes Biden for containing monitoring of social media of visa applicants.

Fair criticism.

Trump is literally arresting visa holders for authoring opinion articles he doesn’t like.

Biden censored social media, the government is not supposed to be involved in censoring social media, the government has no business violating religious rights by forcing people to vaccinate. That is more egregious than telling foreign nationals to stop writing anti-American rhetoric while living in our country as guests.

 

[Marener]

Biden censored social media, the government is not supposed to be involved in censoring social media, the government has no business violating religious rights by forcing people to vaccinate. That is more egregious than telling foreign nationals to stop writing anti-American rhetoric while living in our country as guests.

Trump didn’t arrest and deport a student on a visa for writing anything anti-America. They merely acknowledged common criticisms against Israel.

The government didn’t censor anyone. Social media companies decided who to censor.

Religious exemptions for vaccines were authorized.

Anything else?