When he figured out she was not a threat to his life, why did he still shoot her in the head?.
Assuming facts not in evidence.
I get being afraid at 3 am or whenever, but SHE WAS NOT A THREAT TO HIS LIFE. .
You are assuming he knew that she was not a threat to him and that he intentionally shot her in spite of knowing that. I can dream up wild scenarios where he would be justified or excused in shooting her, but I will not because it would be unsupported speculation.
Can we just wait until we get some further facts before we lynch him?.. that is all I request.
That is the only way to justify him shooting her in the head and from I am hearing, he shot her in the back of the head? How the **** do you justify that shooting.
See, there you go, the police report is that he shot her in the face so you are basing your opinion on inaccurate facts.
I hope this ****** goes away forever. **** him.
Conversely, I hope the facts come out in full and justice is served. If that means he is sent away for life, I am fine with it.