Did Robert Mueller get appointed by the AG without advise and consent? YES. It is common practice....and legal.
'Without Merit' Judge Shuts Down Trump's Latest Trial Requent.
- Thread starter 0311
- Start date
Yes, there is precedent in the DC courts/appeals that has been ruled on. Chutkan is following precedent, by ruling Smith is a validly appointed special prosecutor. Trump is not arguing Smith is not legal, in the DC case.... because precedent was set in DC that he was.....
No court has ruled Jack smith is legally appointed
Special counsel/ special prosecutors....
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Diamond Member
- Jan 21, 2021
- 10,058
- 9,206
- 2,138
More election interference by the DOJ.The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”
'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request
The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...www.rawstory.com
The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”
“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.
Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.
That case doesn’t say that Jack smith was legally appointed
- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,930
- 8,934
- 475
Still, I think her releasing this was to sway opinion.
We can disagree on the content, because most website are saying she released evidence, and new allegations, and I can’t speak to the legality of it, I think it’s unethical though. But, I can’t think of any other reason she would release this other than for political reasons
- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,930
- 8,934
- 475
Then how do they get around the constitutional requirements?
If they are arguing that special counsel is an inferior office then that would have to mean that smith is being supervised by the AG, but if that’s the case then how could the investigation be independent and free from bias? I thought the special counsel was an independent thing operating on its own without being overseen by the AG..is that not right? If it is, then the office of special counsel would be considered a principle office and subject to advice and consent.
What's the difference between the Robert Mueller appointment by the AG and the Jack Smith appointment?
That is the argument on Trump's side, but Smith does report to the AG under special counsel Doj rules....keeping him separate but still overseen and able to be fired by the AG, under the special counsel rules.
One was acting as a US Attorney, and the other simply leading an investigation.
Huh? Who was acting as a US Attorney and who was leading an investigation?
The one who was illegally appointed was acting as a US Attorney, hence why the appointment was illegal.
FBI agents, simply running an investigation don't have to go through the appointment process like US Attorenys,
Did you not bother to actually read any of the case law??
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,267
- 99,379
- 3,645
Oh look, links you never read.Nope.
You won’t understand this cite, either.
Nor will you comprehend any part of this link:
Remand Without Vacatur and the Ab Initio Invalidity of Unlawful...
www.law.virginia.edu
And this one will mystify you:
Once A Law Is Declared Unconstitutional, It Becomes Inoperative From Its Inception; Void Ab Initio : Supreme Court
A constitution bench of the Supreme Court has reiterated that a declaration as to such unconstitutionality will relate back to the time of the law's enactment.www.livelaw.in
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,267
- 99,379
- 3,645
That's one way a person would argue that what she did is wrong or against the rules.
That person will of course not be you. Not ever.
You have more than shown us this.
airplanemechanic
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2014
- 20,724
- 16,645
- 2,415
Fucking guilty of beating Hillary and then embarassing Biden on the world stage. Now the left has tried to assassinate him twice.
Sore loser, aren't ya?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,267
- 99,379
- 3,645
These are of course not conclusions drawn from facts. They are first premises insisted upon, to prop up a coping narrative.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
New Topics
-
-
-
US aid cuts leave food for millions mouldering in storage- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 8
-
DHS Exploring Reality TV Show Where Migrants Compete For Citizenship- Started by EvilEyeFleegle
- Replies: 3
-
DOGE went looking for phone fraud at SSA -- and found almost none
- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 5
Latest Discussions
-
-
-
Here we go again. Yet another black on white murder censored by the evil TV networks.- Latest: TheProgressivePatriot
