'Without Merit' Judge Shuts Down Trump's Latest Trial Requent.

He keeps proclaiming his innocence, the evidence would prove that innocence. Yet he does not want it released.

For an innocent man, he sure as fuck is acting guilty.
The media reports the manufactured 'evidence' but never ever reports any evidence to rebut it and that is purely political to hurt Trump as much as possible before an election. In other words it is election interference pure and simple.

To object to that is not acting guilty. That is properly defending oneself.
 
The media reports the manufactured 'evidence' but never ever reports any evidence to rebut it and that is purely political to hurt Trump as much as possible before an election.
Lots of hot air.

No facts or evidence or argument.

One might think this is self soothing fantasy.
 
These are of course not conclusions drawn from facts. They are first premises insisted upon, to prop up a coping narrative.

Fact: Trump beat Hillary
Fact: Trump embarrassed Biden on the world stage, so badly the left threw him in the dumpster.
Fact: Trump had two assassination attempts on his life.

So which part isn't fact?

Sounds to me like the left knows they can't beat him honestly, so they'll rig the election again or just kill Trump before election day. Ya know, those 81 million votes someone who hid in the basement for the entire election season had? Beating a president that ADDED 10 MILLION votes over his last election that he won? The most votes ever cast for an incumbent president, one that was supposedly so hated and so unpopular that he added more votes his 2nd time around than any other incumbent president in history?
 
Last edited:
Fact: Trump beat Hillary
Fact: Trump embarrassed Biden on the world stage, so badly the left threw him in the dumpster.
Fact: Trump had two assassination attempts on his life.

So which part isn't fact?
Haha, exactly. Thanks for the demonstration.
 
Nah, you didn't.

You couldn't make a single point from them if your life depended on it.

Your tactics are not new or creative.
More lies from Farty. What Farty lacks in honesty, integrity and decency, he compensates for with imbecility.
 
More lies from Farty. What Farty lacks in honesty, integrity and decency, he compensates for with imbecility.
As I was saying.

While it is nice to have you make my points for me, it really is not necessary.
 
This will go on for pages and pages.

What will not be posted is any cogent point from the articles he posted but did not read.
 
That is the argument on Trump's side, but Smith does report to the AG under special counsel Doj rules....keeping him separate but still overseen and able to be fired by the AG, under the special counsel rules.

But free to run his own investigation and not directly supervised by AG. To be an independent counsel, he would have to be free from being under the AG.

Also, house rule do have a section about special counsel requiring advice and consent but I’m not 100% sure it applies here or not.
 
That's one way a person would argue that what she did is wrong or against the rules.

That person will of course not be you. Not ever.

You have more than shown us this.
Did I not say I wasn’t sure on the legality? See, you’re putting words in my mouth. I said I think it unethical and probably election influencing, but I never said it WAS illegal

Read what I say, not what you think I say.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom