'Without Merit' Judge Shuts Down Trump's Latest Trial Requent.

[0311]

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”

'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...

www.rawstory.com

The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”

“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.

Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.

 

[0311]

He keeps proclaiming his innocence, the evidence would prove that innocence. Yet he does not want it released.

For an innocent man, he sure as **** is acting guilty.

 

[struth]

Wow, I didn’t know anyone was actually still paying attention to the illegally appointed political prosecution…weird

 

[excalibur]

This is pure election interference by the Communist judge Chutkan.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”

'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...

www.rawstory.com

The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”

“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.

Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.

Because he knows there is evidence there that the public doesn't yet know about.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is pure election interference by the Communist judge Chutkan.

Haha, you dummies think any negative facts about the orange rapist are "election interference".

Amateur gaslighters, preparing to try to steal an election.

 

[BULLDOG]

Wow, I didn’t know anyone was actually still paying attention to the illegally appointed political prosecution…weird

I'm sure you and the rest of the cult are wishing that no one is paying attention, but it looks like you won't get your wish.

 

[struth]

I'm sure you and the rest of the cult are wishing that no one is paying attention, but it looks like you won't get your wish.

Oh we all saw the court rule that Jackie boy was illegally appointed. He’s a man throwing pasta on the wall at this point, hoping it sticks

 

[0311]

I will repeat. He is blocking the release of Jack Smith's evidence. Diaper Don keeps proclaiming his innocence. IF there is evidence of that innocence, why is he continuing to block it?

 

[BULLDOG]

Oh we all saw the court rule that Jackie boy was illegally appointed. He’s a man throwing pasta on the wall at this point, hoping it sticks

Refresh my memory. Which court, and what ruling did they make to remedy the situation?

 

[struth]

Refresh my memory. Which court, and what ruling did they make to remedy the situation?

The US District…appoint someone legally.

It’s clear you all should of keep Xiden as your nominee at this point. Jackie and company are desperate

 

[BULLDOG]

The US District…appoint someone legally.

It’s clear you all should of keep Xiden as your nominee at this point. Jackie and company are desperate

You need to be more specific about your point, if you have one.

 

[IM2]

I will repeat. He is blocking the release of Jack Smith's evidence. Diaper Don keeps proclaiming his innocence. IF there is evidence of that innocence, why is he continuing to block it?

Because he's guilty.

 

[0311]

Because he's guilty.

He so very ******* guilty.

 

[0311]

Refresh my memory. Which court, and what ruling did they make to remedy the situation?

That would be NONE!!!

 

[ThisIsMe]

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”

'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...

www.rawstory.com

The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”

“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.

Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.

I wouldn’t expect Chutkan to go against her own ruling…

 

[Lastamender]

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.”

'Without merit': Judge shuts down Trump's latest trial request

The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election interference case denied the former president’s request to stop the release of further evidence before the election — but paused the ruling to allow the former president a week to “evaluate litigation options.” The decision Thursday afternoon...

www.rawstory.com

The decision Thursday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finds that making public Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest redacted filing is “appropriate,” and that Trump’s “blanket objections to further unsealing are without merit.”

“As in his previous filing, he identifies no specific substantive objections to particular proposed redactions,” Chutkan wrote in the ruling.

Trump had attempted to keep any further evidence against him in his criminal case out of the view of voters until after the Nov. 5 election.

How is this case doing?

 

[BULLDOG]

How is this case doing?

One case out of how many?

 

[Lastamender]

One case out of how many?

More than one. The lawfare has backfired.

 

[ThisIsMe]

He keeps proclaiming his innocence, the evidence would prove that innocence. Yet he does not want it released.

For an innocent man, he sure as **** is acting guilty.

I don’t blame him, they are releasing the evidence that has not been tested in court. There very well could be rebuttals to this evidence, yet the judge is just releasing it anyway.

This is a gamble she’s taking as, this release could cause problems with the jury pool in a future trial, this will likely end up being a mistrial now.