Saigon
Gold Member
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Guns can not legally be owned by the mentally ill.
Ever heard of Virginia Tech?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Guns can not legally be owned by the mentally ill.
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Guns can not legally be owned by the mentally ill.
Ever heard of Virginia Tech?
FA Q2 -
Can you link to the gun control measure that you are referring to?
I'm not sure if this question is aimed at me, but if so, I am referring to the gun control measures implemented in the UK after Dunblane in 1997.
In response to this debate, the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997 were enacted, which effectively made private ownership of handguns illegal in the United Kingdom.
Guns can not legally be owned by the mentally ill.
Ever heard of Virginia Tech?
yes once again the state did not follow though and let him slip through the cracks
FA Q2 -
Can you link to the gun control measure that you are referring to?
I'm not sure if this question is aimed at me, but if so, I am referring to the gun control measures implemented in the UK after Dunblane in 1997.
In response to this debate, the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997 were enacted, which effectively made private ownership of handguns illegal in the United Kingdom.
This is an interesting point to me. The same thing happened in Australia: VERY fast reaction by government to any crisis can get laws passed right then that could not be passed if time goes by. So they both moved fast, and got rid of guns. It's the only way, and I bet the NRA knows it, too.
A huge massacre (and many have tried: the Columbine kids were hoping to kill many hundreds with their large propane bombs collapsing the floors, but they didn't test them and none went off) could build the sudden support needed, but I'm not sure that is possible in this country. Too big for European-type cultures. Too many animals, too many criminals, too great distances to hope for police help. It's like trying to get rid of cars in favor of public transport: simply can't, the distances are too large.
The epidemic of crazy-killings is in its flood now and there may be a huge massacre that moves public opinion that far and fast. I expect one, and this year, actually. I hope it doesn't affect anyone here, if such a thing happens. Or any of the ones surely to come this year.
Ever heard of Virginia Tech?
yes once again the state did not follow though and let him slip through the cracks
They ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL, 100%, "slip through the cracks," which I take to mean the family knows and the school or psychologists know or other professionals, but nobody does diddly-squat.
Think about all the madmen who have shot up malls and movies and schools: all of them were crazy as hoot owls and nobody stopped any of them. Doesn't happen.
Seems to me that should change. How, I don't know. Maybe the same orders to psychologists and teachers and doctors as with child abuse: you hide it, the law WILL come after you when it comes to light.
There is waaaaaaay too much collusion. Hide it, don't tell, not our business, he won't come back to therapy and pay me.
This needs to stop.
At about the time that the trend started trending downward efforts to hamper ownership increased. At the same time as those efforts ramped up, legal firearm ownership increased in response.
Some folks would call this a clue
guns do not cause suicide - but enable successful suicide attempts -
So do tall buildings.
16,000 suicides by gun last year...
vs.
a few dozen successful jumps off tall buildings.
But here's the gag. Owners of tall buildings actually take measures to make sure that people don't jump off their buildings. Windows are locked, doors are locked, there are security measures taken.
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Ignore those 16000 gun suicides because a dozen people managed to jump off a building
The sad thing is that everyone of us knows that there will be another terrible massacre in the US very soon - and one far worse than the Boston Bombing. It will be another school, or another workplace, another nutcase, and another 20 or 30 innocent people killed.
And another lunatic who "slipped through the cracks" because background checks are an intolerable breach of rights.
Ignore those 16000 gun suicides because a dozen people managed to jump off a building
Suicides don't matter. That's not at all what the whole gun controversy is about.
It's about stranger danger. We feel gravely out of control of our lives when there are crazies around ready and able to run into the school and shoot our children or run into the grocery store and shoot us.
Nobody is ever going to change laws because of suicides. That's just not where it's at.
So.... why arent you campaigning to make it easier for these poeple to buy guns?Republicans and gun violence:
![]()
The Durango Herald 03/09/2013 | Most gun deaths in state are suicides
Suicides accounted for 76 percent of the 6,258 deaths from guns over the 12 years, while homicides comprised 20 percent. The rest were either accidental, legal shootings by law-enforcement officers, or unexplained. Nationally, about 60 percent of gun deaths are suicides.
Gun suicides were disproportionately committed by white residents
Red State vs. Blue State battle: Suicide rates
When you look at the lies and emptiness of following frauds like Sailer, Limbaugh, and the Republicans, it really comes as no surprise depression, hopelessness, and suicide prevails among the right-wingers.
Gun laws do - because guns do not disappear from the streets overnight. It takes time for the level of gun ownership to begin to drop, whether through buy-back schemes or just lower sales of guns.
If the US implemented gun safety laws tomorrow, I would expect it to take five years for it to really start to make a difference at street level. .
The sad thing is that everyone of us knows that there will be another terrible massacre in the US very soon - and one far worse than the Boston Bombing. It will be another school, or another workplace, another nutcase, and another 20 or 30 innocent people killed.

So do tall buildings.
16,000 suicides by gun last year...
vs.
a few dozen successful jumps off tall buildings.
But here's the gag. Owners of tall buildings actually take measures to make sure that people don't jump off their buildings. Windows are locked, doors are locked, there are security measures taken.
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Ignore those 16000 gun suicides because a dozen people managed to jump off a building
So do tall buildings.
16,000 suicides by gun last year...
vs.
a few dozen successful jumps off tall buildings.
But here's the gag. Owners of tall buildings actually take measures to make sure that people don't jump off their buildings. Windows are locked, doors are locked, there are security measures taken.
Unlike the gun industry... where, hey, just because you're mentally ill shouldn't stop you from excercising your second amendment rights!
Ignore those 16000 gun suicides because a dozen people managed to jump off a building
With gun violence down, is America arming against an imagined threat?


At about the time that the trend started trending downward efforts to hamper ownership increased. At the same time as those efforts ramped up, legal firearm ownership increased in response.
Some folks would call this a clue
The murder rate dropped as the Crack Wars ended