I don't see anything there to support your lie about vote tampering. Why do you lie so much? Why don't you just admit you lied?
Notice folks, that Benny just keeps repeating his BS ad nauseum DESPITE being factually and logically proven wrong on several points. Benny doesn't have the courage to admit being proven wrong, so he just keeps parroting the SOS. The chronology of the posts shows that I merely provided enough evidence to show that Nickolaus actions would raise anyone's eyebrows, given her past record. Kloppenburg is well within legal and just cause to call for a recount.
As to the whistleblower thing, you've also shown no evidence that supports the idea thats not true either. Might not be, but nothing you've posted proves otherwise. As I said befor, neither you nor I know anything about that.
Again, as the chronology of the posts shows, Benny made several statements as if they were fact...the legal definitions DO NOT support Benny's assertions as valid, but in fact disprove Benny's attempt to substitute his supposition and conjecture for the legal definitions. But being an intellectual coward, Benny just keeps trying to construct scenarios that justify his assertions....but the chronology of the posts will always be Benny's undoing.
Doesn't change the fact that in the BIG BLUE LETTERS you think proved your point there are more DEMOCRATICS listed than Republicans and there is NOTHING about any vote tampering.
Benny's blatherings just give futher testimony to his intellectual cowardice and insipid stubborness. The chronology of the post will always be there for the objective reader to see this...despite the eternal denial and parroted nonsense of Benny. I leave him to it.
The only thing for anyone to notice is that you're a laughably stupid liar. Why not show a modicum of honesty and just admit the case had nothing to do with any vote tampering, that it was both parties that were at fault and that it was about staff working on campaigns not about election of vote fraud?
Oh, thats right, because you're a lying ass.
BTW dumbass, when did I ever say Klappenbagger wasn't entitled to a recount...
Oh thats right, I didn't, and you're just a further liying stupid ass.
Also liar, the only thing I've ever done here is hold out the possibility that it could be a case of whistle blowing and said quite clearly that neither you nor I know anything different. You're the ******* moron who's making claims you can't back up as if being a whistleblower would somehow preclude anyone from accepting immunity in the event that they believed they might be implicated in criminal activity doing so. Fact is they can be, and immunity is a tool the prosecution uses to get at the truth. Maybe she was implicated, maybe she was a small fish (which dumbass, she was), maybe they offered her immunity to get at bigger fish (which dumbass, is what happenned). Whether she went to them or they came to her is what neither you nor I know, so stop pretending you do.
Are you truly this ******* stupid or are you just acting so to try and be obstinate?
/QUOTE]
