Wisconsin Supreme Court Election: Liberals Win Control of Wisconsin State Supreme Court For The First Time In 15-Years.

[Blaster]

Again, whose body is it.

The unborn child is just as much the man's as it is the woman's. Just because it is in the woman's body doesn't mean squat.

 

[otto105]

When did I say that? Or are you claiming all abortions due to rape? What sort of lying sack of shit are you? (Rhetorical).

You want both to have equal rights regarding her body.

 

[otto105]

The unborn child is just as much the man's as it is the woman's. Just because it is in the woman's body doesn't mean squat.

Yes, it does mean squat. She makes the decision.

End of story.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Yes, it does mean squat. She makes the decision.

End of story.

Typing "end of story" at the end of your comment does not make you right.

 

[Blaster]

Yes, it does mean squat. She makes the decision.

End of story.

No it is not the end of the story.

 

[Rogue AI]

You want both to have equal rights regarding her body.

Males should have equal abortion rights. Not to force a woman to do anything with their body, but the right to abort the male's parental responsibility on the same timeline a woman can abort a baby. You know, equality.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

Blaster said:
The unborn child is just as much the man's as it is the woman's. Just because it is in the woman's body doesn't mean squat.

Men who argue that they have the same “right” to decide as any women they impregnate as to whether that woman will be forced to carry to term an unwanted pregnancy … are just revealing their crazy macho arrogance and the reactionary logic of their desire to control women’s bodies and lives.

They are refusing to recognize the very crucial biological difference between men and women — the very difference that they demagogically accuse Liberals of ignoring or being ignorant of!

Here’s a recent article on this old endlessly relevant theme, which was expressed pithily in the famous feminist slogan:

“If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.”

 

[otto105]

Males should have equal abortion rights. Not to force a woman to do anything with their body, but the right to abort the male's parental responsibility on the same timeline a woman can abort a baby. You know, equality.

So, fuck and be free...

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

:

“If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.”

Disgusting. Plenty of women denounce murdering their own kid; men are perfectly capable of killing kids too, already, we just usually don’t.

 

[Rogue AI]

So, fuck and be free...

If you folks insist on recreational baby killing, all parties should have equal rights.

 

[otto105]

If you folks insist on recreational baby killing, all parties should have equal rights.

herschel walker is going to have to write more checks.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

If you folks insist on recreational baby killing, all parties should have equal rights.

You’ll have to grow a vagina first …
You’ve already proven you have the requisite stupidity to try.

 

[Rogue AI]

You’ll have to grow a vagina first …
You’ve already proven you have the requisite stupidity to try.

You should probably go back and read exactly what I laid out as equal rights. It would diminish your obvious stupidity and utter lack of attention to detail. If literacy isn't your thing, perhaps kindly STFU would be more appropriate.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

We are talking about the Wisconsin victory for traditional liberal views of a woman’s right to choose. We are not talking about men’s oppression by women, or whatever you are complaining about. You can start a separate OP or make your case here.

But I’m now addressing your b.s. about “baby killing” and your fundamental opposition to women’s right to control her own body, and choose abortion rather than carry an unwanted pregnancy to birth and then have to raise an unwanted and unplanned-for child.

Most Americans clearly agree more with me than you on this subject.

 

[0311]

Males should have equal abortion rights. Not to force a woman to do anything with their body, but the right to abort the male's parental responsibility on the same timeline a woman can abort a baby. You know, equality.

How many Men walk away from their parental responsibilities every year? Get fucking real.

 

[0311]

If you folks insist on recreational baby killing, all parties should have equal rights.

Please site the specific post in which I addressed "Recreational Baby Killing" as you put it. In fact site the specific post of any person to this thread who, "Insist On Recreational Baby Killing." You cannot and will not find a single post and you know it. Your ridiculous Conservative Hyperbole is pathetic.

You want Women to be forced to carry a baby that is product of rape and/or incest is just plain wrong.

IF a Mother's Life is endangered by the pregnancy, so fucking what....the baby will live.....but without Mother.

Where in all you sideways logic is the responsibility the Father being discussed?

It takes two people fucking to make a baby. It seem Cons only see mother as responsible, where is man in this?

How many dead beat Conservative Dads walk away from their children? How many refuse to accept their responsibility as a parent. Why is only the Woman Cons bloviate about.

Force the Man who makes the baby Pay for that baby for the rest of it's life. Force the Man who makes the baby to live up to his responsibilities which include a roof over the baby's head, food the baby's stomach, medical for the baby and a damn good education to boot. Men seem not be in that part of the discussion at all.

Make the guy who fucked that baby into existence be a responsible Father.

Pass laws demanding Fathers pay child support when they divorce/abandon that child.

Men easily walk away from their responsibilities every fucking day and you fucking Cons are silent on that.

You force a Woman have a baby, then force the Man to be the Father he should be.

 

[Rambunctious]

Big whoop!.....

 

[otto105]

Please site the specific post in which I addressed "Recreational Baby Killing" as you put it. In fact site the specific post of any person to this thread who, "Insist On Recreational Baby Killing." You cannot and will not find a single post and you know it. Your ridiculous Conservative Hyperbole is pathetic.

You want Women to be forced to carry a baby that is product of rape and/or incest is just plain wrong.

IF a Mother's Life is endangered by the pregnancy, so fucking what....the baby will live.....but without Mother.

Where in all you sideways logic is the responsibility being discussed? It takes two people fucking to make a baby. It seem Cons only see mother as responsible, where is man in this? How many dead beat Conservative Dads walk away from their children? How many refuse to accept their responsibility as a parent. Why is only the Woman Cons bloviate about.

Force the Man who makes the baby Pay for that baby for the rest of it's life. Force the Man who makes the baby to live up to his responsibilities which include a roof over the baby's head, food the baby's stomach, medical for the baby and a damn good education to boot. Men seem not be in that part of the discussion at all. Make the guy who fucked that baby into existence be a responsible Father. Pass laws demanding Fathers pay child support when they divorce/abandon that child. Men easily walk away from their responsibilities every fucking day and you fucking Cons are silent on that.

You force a Woman have a baby, then force the Man to be the Father he should be.

Hell, cons men voted for deadbeat dad herschel walker

 

[0311]

Hell, cons men voted for deadbeat dad herschel walker

Cons love dead beat dads, they have so many of them in their party.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Women's Reproductive Rights are protected. Voter Rights are protected. The highly ReNaziKlan Gerrymandered Maps are in danger. I'm loving it.

Wisconsin Supreme Court election sends message on abortion rights

In overturning a national right to abortion last summer, the U.S. Supreme Court gave conservatives a policy they’d been seeking for nearly half a century. In the process, the justices also angered millions of Americans who have made their views known in key elections.
The latest sign of that dynamic came in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election Tuesday, when a Milwaukee County judge won by 11 points to give liberals the majority after 15 years of conservative control.
The candidate and the Democrats supporting her focused relentlessly on abortion rights in a state that saw the availability of abortion disappear after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The Wisconsin court is now expected in the next year or two to overturn the state’s 19th-century ban on most abortions.
Democrats plan to continue to rally voters around abortion rights, starting this fall with legislative races in Virginia, where the Republican governor has pushed for a 15-week abortion ban. Abortion could also loom large in some of the dozens of state Supreme Court races that will be held around the country next year. It’s sure to play an outsize role in the 2024 presidential election, as well as House and Senate races, because Congress could consider a nationwide abortion ban.
“I think the moment when Republicans in the presidential primary debate are asked whether they’ll support a national abortion ban and they raise their hands is the moment that they will lose the next presidential election,” said Ben Wikler, the chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin.