Winning! Supreme Court Tosses Ruling Against Christian Bakers Who Refused Cake For Gay Couple

[Leo123]

What "superior" right would that be? I love the heterosexuals...They keep making gays and babies they don't want for gays to adopt. A truly symbiotic relationship.

There is no 'right' for a homosexual 'marriage.' And, Yes, heterosexuals are the only way gays can procreate. Sad for gays actually, but then, they are aberrant to typical human sexuality. Gays really need to promote their 'gayness' to young children because some young children are sexually pliable. And the gay contingent knows it. They are nothing but fetishists gone amok.

 

[Seawytch]

Ah, so it was as I expected. Your post was deceptive as usual...you made a bunch of claims and linked to a GLAAD report as though that would give your post some sort of credence. What you didn't realize is that your opinion piece presented the facts to you wrong. Read the original report, not someone else's opinion of it...or can't you think for yourself?

Straight from the GLAAD website itself, sweetie. Exactly as reported from the Daily Signal.

View attachment 267474

View attachment 267475

https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating Acceptance 2019.pdf

That is not a measure of people's comfort level as you claimed. Are you now admitting you or the Daily Stormer were deceptive?

 

[Seawytch]

Gays and lesbians are perfectly capable of reproducing

So explain it to us. The board is dying to hear this one.

When two lesbians rub their vaginas together, how exactly does fertilization take place? Which dyke carries the sperm necessary for fertilization?

And when a queer sticks his penis up the butt of another queer, how exactly does fertilization and gestation take place? Which queen carries an egg in his anus? And where does that queer carry the baby?!?

Seawytch yet again illustrating why Dumbocrats are the party of rejecting science. First “Global Warming” and now “men can have menstrual cycles and give birth”.

Do you carry your brain in your ass? Tell.me something, why could you not simply say "when gays have sex"? Why do alleged heterosexual conservatives feel they must graphically describe gays having sex? Is it a repression thing or just a bigoted asshole thing?

Well, I'm glad I'm available to educate you on the science (you'll have to satisfy your sexual fantasies with porn). Procreation does not require intercourse.

 

[Seawytch]

What "superior" right would that be? I love the heterosexuals...They keep making gays and babies they don't want for gays to adopt. A truly symbiotic relationship.

There is no 'right' for a homosexual 'marriage.' And, Yes, heterosexuals are the only way gays can procreate. Sad for gays actually, but then, they are aberrant to typical human sexuality. Gays really need to promote their 'gayness' to young children because some young children are sexually pliable. And the gay contingent knows it. They are nothing but fetishists gone amok.

No, it isn't. I managed to get pregnant four times, carrying five babies to term, without once having sex with a man. How do you not know about artificial insemination and IVF in the 21st century?

Oh, a "gays are pedophiles" reference...how 20th century. You're like 70 or 80 years old aren't you?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So you're admitting you ignored all of the links to the facts of the case. Good to know that you choose to remain ignorant.

No admissions at all. None needed. The case was argued and won on the grounds of freedom of religious beliefs.
Try moving to China if you don't like it.

But only if you're anti gay and not racist, right, asshat?

There is no evidence that the respective bakers, in Colorado and Oregon, had any special animus towards gays. The Kleins, for instance, had many gay regulars as customers before the whole cake thing arose.
Keep on swinging dip shit. I suspect that's also true in the case of the Colorado guy or you'd surely
be crapping your adult diaper over that too.

Your problem is that you're a homophobe that doesn't believe gays deserve equal rights and protections.

Oh, your anger is so frightening. You make me scared.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yeah, now Trump can stage an event to give the bigot the Medal of Freedom.

Good idea!! And NO, the Baker is not a 'bigot.'

So if a baker said to an interracial couple "I can't bake your cake because the bible says mixing races is a sin", he's not a bigot?

Typical leftist non-argument: "Well, well, well . . . BLACK PEOPLE!!!!"

I'd ask if it bothered you that black people themselves do not appreciate being equated with homosexuals, but we all know they're just useful pawns to you, not actual people who matter.

Things you make up in your head don't bother me at all.

"For many years now, I have been an outspoken supporter of civil and human rights for gay and lesbian people. I've always felt that homophobic attitudes and policies were unjust and unworthy of a free society and must be opposed by all Americans who believe in democracy."
"
As an African-American woman, I am concerned about discrimination against my race and gender. But it's just not good enough to support human rights for one's own race or culture and then be silent about injustices to other groups. As long as that's all we do, our successes will be limited, and we will be working against each other instead of with each other."

"I've made the decision that I'm not going to put up with homophobic bigotry because it's morally wrong and because it lowers human rights standards for everyone."

"I appeal to everyone who believes in Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream to make room at the table of brother and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people. Gays and lesbians stood up for civil rights in Montgomery and Selma, Alabama, in Albany, Georgia, and St. Augustine, Florida, and many other campaigns of the civil rights movement. Many of these courageous men and women were fighting for my freedom at a time when they could find few voices for their own, and I salute their contributions."

Coretta Scott King​

Oh, WELL, if you can quote one person, that means ALL black people feel that way, because obviously, blacks are just hive-mind drones, not real humans with independent thoughts.

Or maybe leftists are just ignorant bigots.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Black people weren't happen about the feminist movement piggybacking on their Civil Rights movement either. It's a funny thing, this human nature.

It’s not a “funny thing” at all. It’s called “reason” or “logic”. There is nothing abnormal about being black. It’s 100% natural. Homosexuality, on the other hand, is an anomaly of nature. Therefore, an African-American recognizes it is absurd for homosexuals to try to piggyback off of their plight.

Coretta Scott King

Look at you! You found a quote from a single black person out of millions and millions of black people. Atta girl!

I can find plenty more. Can you find a prominent black civil rights leader saying something different?

We get that as a mindless leftist herd animal, you're overwhelmed by "THIS person thinks so, and he's famous, so that makes him RIGHT!" But this isn't actually about this or that individual celebrity. Can you find a poll saying that a majority of black people think it's perfectly okay and appropriate to compare homosexuality to race?

 

[Seawytch]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

If it's in the Constitution, you should be able to make the exact same arguments to discriminate against blacks or Jewish people...but you can't. How come anti gay bigots get this "freedom" but racist bigots do not?

 

[Seawytch]

Black people weren't happen about the feminist movement piggybacking on their Civil Rights movement either. It's a funny thing, this human nature.

It’s not a “funny thing” at all. It’s called “reason” or “logic”. There is nothing abnormal about being black. It’s 100% natural. Homosexuality, on the other hand, is an anomaly of nature. Therefore, an African-American recognizes it is absurd for homosexuals to try to piggyback off of their plight.

Coretta Scott King

Look at you! You found a quote from a single black person out of millions and millions of black people. Atta girl!

I can find plenty more. Can you find a prominent black civil rights leader saying something different?

We get that as a mindless leftist herd animal, you're overwhelmed by "THIS person thinks so, and he's famous, so that makes him RIGHT!" But this isn't actually about this or that individual celebrity. Can you find a poll saying that a majority of black people think it's perfectly okay and appropriate to compare homosexuality to race?

Snotweiller couldn't find a prominent civil rights leader saying anything to the contrary of Ms King. Can you succeed where he failed? No? Get back to us after you've commissioned that poll.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

If it's in the Constitution, you should be able to make the exact same arguments to discriminate against blacks or Jewish people...but you can't. How come anti gay bigots get this "freedom" but racist bigots do not?

Why are you recycling your old failed arguments?
The bible does not condemn Jews, obviously, or racial groups of any sort. It does condemn sodomites, men that lay with men. I would think even with someone as seemingly stupid as you that would be apparent.

You can claim that racists can use the bible to justify their hate, but they really can't.

 

[dblack]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

Interpreting the free exercise clause to grant special exemption for religious belief is a direct violation of the first amendment, and one for Court's bigger mistakes. The PA laws being discussed DO violate the free exercise clause, but that doesn't mean religious people should get a special exemption. It means the entire law should be struck down.

 

[dblack]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

If it's in the Constitution, you should be able to make the exact same arguments to discriminate against blacks or Jewish people...but you can't. How come anti gay bigots get this "freedom" but racist bigots do not?

Because most people are stupid and hypocritical. But that doesn't really address the merits and flaws of the policies in question.

 

[Seawytch]

So you're admitting you ignored all of the links to the facts of the case. Good to know that you choose to remain ignorant.

No admissions at all. None needed. The case was argued and won on the grounds of freedom of religious beliefs.
Try moving to China if you don't like it.

Incorrect. As you have been shown repeatedly, it was not the judgement the plaintiffs (and all the bigots) were seeking.

Lame. Why would I move to China?

But only if you're anti gay and not racist, right, asshat?

There is no evidence that the respective bakers, in Colorado and Oregon, had any special animus towards gays. The Kleins, for instance, had many gay regulars as customers before the whole cake thing arose.
Keep on swinging dip shit. I suspect that's also true in the case of the Colorado guy or you'd surely
be crapping your adult diaper over that too.

If gay were replaced with interracial, with the same situations as you perceive them, you'd be calling them racist bigots. If a baker said he'd make cookies for the couple but not a wedding cake because their religion forbids it, you'd be okay with that?

Oh, your anger is so frightening. You make me scared.

Poor baby...but I'm not angry at all. Just stating facts.

 

[Seawytch]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

Interpreting the free exercise clause to grant special exemption for religious belief is a direct violation of the first amendment, and one for Court's bigger mistakes. The PA laws being discussed DO violate the free exercise clause, but that doesn't mean religious people should get a special exemption. It means the entire law should be struck down.

I don't disagree, but you're not going to get rid of them. There's no political will to do it. Why do you think the SCOTUS punted?

 

[mdk]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

Interpreting the free exercise clause to grant special exemption for religious belief is a direct violation of the first amendment, and one for Court's bigger mistakes. The PA laws being discussed DO violate the free exercise clause, but that doesn't mean religious people should get a special exemption. It means the entire law should be struck down.

Sadly, very few people actually want to get rid of them and it appears the courts are quite reluctant to do so as well.

 

[Seawytch]

If it's in the Constitution, you should be able to make the exact same arguments to discriminate against blacks or Jewish people...but you can't. How come anti gay bigots get this "freedom" but racist bigots do not?

Why are you recycling your old failed arguments?
The bible does not condemn Jews, obviously, or racial groups of any sort. It does condemn sodomites, men that lay with men. I would think even with someone as seemingly stupid as you that would be apparent.

You can claim that racists can use the bible to justify their hate, but they really can't.

Yeah, they can just as much as anti gay bigots can. The bible is just as clear on the separation of races as it is on "being gay is a sin".

Just because you agree with the anti gay bigots and disagree with the racist bigots does not make THEIR "deeply held religious beliefs" any less deeply held.

Besides, who said the bigots have to be Christian?

 

[Seawytch]

So you support people making up "deeply held religious beliefs" to get around the business laws they were supposed to follow by getting a business license.

Not "making up" anything, a-hole. It's in the Constitution. I'm not surprised you don't know or seem to care.
I know you troll as a hobby but your comments really are pathetic.

If it's in the Constitution, you should be able to make the exact same arguments to discriminate against blacks or Jewish people...but you can't. How come anti gay bigots get this "freedom" but racist bigots do not?

Because most people are stupid and hypocritical. But that doesn't really address the merits and flaws of the policies in question.

PA laws are not stupidity. You can argue for or against their merits but they aren't coming from a bad or stupid place. Do away with them and we find out quickly why they're needed.

 

[justinacolmena]

Put yourself in the place of the baker.

There are plenty of set catch-phrases & more-or-less traditional designs for a "straight" wedding cake.

They don't know what a lesbian couple would want on their cake or what might be considered offensive or if that's what the customer really wanted, or if some wild bachelorette-party ladies are pranking the bakery by ordering a cake and refusing to pay for it.

A. Go on a diet: eat less sweets & baked goods.

B. Learn to bake & decorate cakes yourselves.

 

[Toronado3800]

We have God to thank. Hopefully this will put an end to this harassment by Satan's disciples, aka Homosexuals.

Supreme Court Tosses Ruling Against Christian Bakers Who Refused Cake For Gay Couple

My, what hatred. I thought this was supposed to be a Christian nation.

Oh well. What's your dream? That businesses, something all of us and big government helps give birth to, don't have to serve blacks, Muslims, christians or you?

Muslims, Christians and Blacks are not the subject here skippy.

What, ppl who decide to kneel and do weird things aren't the subject?

No, people who think it's their job and their right to judge others as "weird" and then hypocritically gripe about "intolerance" are the subject. Take a bow, you're finally the center of attention.

I am somewhat concerned you do not understand where I am coming from. I was calling out the bigots and those concerned about what kind of sex other ppl are (legally) having.