Will the real Slim Hussein Shady please stand up?

[Liability]

I dont see anything in those words about punishing anyone.

Do you think its possible for someone to have enough money?

Who decides what's enough?

A Presidential Blue Ribbon Commission to be headed by Barney Frank and Vice President Joe Biden. What could possibly go wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrong?

 

[Bill O'Olberman]

So, every want or desire a Congressman has must be put into a bill?

For it to be government policy, yes. You made the claim they want it to be official policy.

Exactly. I didn't say it was policy, I said they wanted it to be policy. But they can't enact it yet. Given time, they would.

So basically youre just fabricating an issue out of nothing. There is not a single legislative action that leads you to believe democrats want to cap wealth, however, you make a baseless hypothetical issue that democrats and Obama will one day try to possibly, maybe, over time, if given the chance try to enact a policy that caps wealth... Really, youre just talking out your ass.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

"I plan on campaigning in all 57 states."-President Barack Hussein Obama

^BEST^

 

[Toro]

"I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." BHO

“I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money" -- BHO

After the shellacking, "The primary engine of America's economic success is not government. It's the ingenuity of America's entrepreneurs." - BHO, yes, seriously

Slim Hussein Shady said all of the above. So what is it?

Will the real Slim Shady please stand up?

The second one is clearly wrong and the third is clearly right but the first is ambiguous. It is best for society that there is broad participation in economic growth. Its bad when only a few are benefiting and everybody else is not, like the past 10 years. If the broad population cannot take it out of the economy, they will take it out of the political arena. If conservatives don't want liberal redistributionist policies rammed down their throats, that's the lesson they should learn by heart.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Yeap he was talking about the person realizing what is enough wealth.

Now I throughly believe there are people who have so much wealth it harms them as a human being.

That is not why I would deside to tax them.

I would deside to tax them because this country has to have revenue to support the needed infrastructure that makes these peoples money make them more money.

Those who benifit the most from the greasing of commerce by our infrastructure USE this infrastructure much more than most do.

You see that guy who uses the interstate to go back and forth to his job uses it.

The guy who owns a couple of companies that recieve goods and ship good in BIG ******* TRUCKS uses the infrastructure much more.

Why so many Americans want these people to get a free ride I will never know.

It all boils down to one thing, obama is a socialist. He said he wanted to spread the wealth around, that is what the health care bill is about. What about all the socialist stuff tacked onto the health care bill and others designed to take more of our freedoms away?

 

[The Infidel]

But they are NOT the only way these infrastructure needs are payed for huh?

Those who use them more and benifit more from their exsistance whould pay their fair share.

They also pay lots in income taxes.... and contribute to the economy in other ways.

Such as:
Putting people to work so they can feed their families, so they can also buy other types of goods and services which goes right into the economy, and without "wealthy" business owners starting companies to employ all of us... we would be in a real bad spot now wouldnt we?

Why we demonize the rich I will never know.

I say get busy making yourself "wealthy" and leave the other guy alone (as long as he is'nt hurting me in any way)



One other thing.... if the gov't did what they were madated to do, rather than persecute us taxpayers, they'd have alot more money to take care of roads and bridges.
"Shovel ready" projects would be all over the place

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I dont see anything in those words about punishing anyone.

Do you think its possible for someone to have enough money?

Sure, what of it?

 

[daveman]

But they are NOT the only way these infrastructure needs are payed for huh?

Those who use them more and benifit more from their exsistance whould pay their fair share.

They already do pay their fair share.

What about those who pay no taxes, but benefit from public infrastructure? Do you think that's fair? I don't.

 

[The T]

I dont see anything in those words about punishing anyone.

Do you think its possible for someone to have enough money?

Who decides what's enough?

A Presidential Blue Ribbon Commission to be headed by Barney Frank and Vice President Joe Biden. What could possibly go wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrong?

The Banking Queen Speaks...

BAWNEY FWANK MOMENT<Parody

BAWNEY FWANK: THE BANKING QUEEN<Parody

(PARODIES and IMAGE Courtesy of EIB)

 

[daveman]

For it to be government policy, yes. You made the claim they want it to be official policy.

Exactly. I didn't say it was policy, I said they wanted it to be policy. But they can't enact it yet. Given time, they would.

So basically youre just fabricating an issue out of nothing. There is not a single legislative action that leads you to believe democrats want to cap wealth, however, you make a baseless hypothetical issue that democrats and Obama will one day try to possibly, maybe, over time, if given the chance try to enact a policy that caps wealth... Really, youre just talking out your ass.

Really? I guess you missed the bit where Congress and Obama decided some people shouldn't make over a half-million a year. Is it so far-fetched they'd eventually like to cap total wealth as well?

Hint: No.

 

[The T]

Exactly. I didn't say it was policy, I said they wanted it to be policy. But they can't enact it yet. Given time, they would.

So basically youre just fabricating an issue out of nothing. There is not a single legislative action that leads you to believe democrats want to cap wealth, however, you make a baseless hypothetical issue that democrats and Obama will one day try to possibly, maybe, over time, if given the chance try to enact a policy that caps wealth... Really, youre just talking out your ass.

Really? I guess you missed the bit where Congress and Obama decided some people shouldn't make over a half-million a year. Is it so far-fetched they'd eventually like to cap total wealth as well?


Hint: No.

Obama fashions a government of many czars


Obama And Geithner Get Ready To Cap Wall Street Pay


And whom are they to tell anyone what they can be paid for anything?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yeap he was talking about the person realizing what is enough wealth.

Now I throughly believe there are people who have so much wealth it harms them as a human being.

That is not why I would deside to tax them.

I would deside to tax them because this country has to have revenue to support the needed infrastructure that makes these peoples money make them more money.

Those who benifit the most from the greasing of commerce by our infrastructure USE this infrastructure much more than most do.

You see that guy who uses the interstate to go back and forth to his job uses it.

The guy who owns a couple of companies that recieve goods and ship good in BIG ******* TRUCKS uses the infrastructure much more.

Why so many Americans want these people to get a free ride I will never know.

Has Derek Jeter made enough money? Tiger Woods? George Soros? Google? Facebook? JP Morgan? Your local grocery store? Shoemaker?

Haven't they all made enough money?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

But they are NOT the only way these infrastructure needs are payed for huh?

Those who use them more and benifit more from their exsistance whould pay their fair share.

Should all the people who use and benefit from government pay their fair share too?

 

[The T]

But they are NOT the only way these infrastructure needs are payed for huh?

Those who use them more and benifit more from their exsistance whould pay their fair share.

Should all the people who use and benefit from government pay their fair share too?

Where's that FLAG from bigrebnc that TM can beat on that hornet's nest with impunity?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." BHO

“I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money" -- BHO

After the shellacking, "The primary engine of America's economic success is not government. It's the ingenuity of America's entrepreneurs." - BHO, yes, seriously

Slim Hussein Shady said all of the above. So what is it?

Will the real Slim Shady please stand up?

The second one is clearly wrong and the third is clearly right but the first is ambiguous. It is best for society that there is broad participation in economic growth. Its bad when only a few are benefiting and everybody else is not, like the past 10 years. If the broad population cannot take it out of the economy, they will take it out of the political arena. If conservatives don't want liberal redistributionist policies rammed down their throats, that's the lesson they should learn by heart.

I agree.

The best way is to shrink the federal government, have Walmart get into the energy business, legalize hemp, sell Fannie and Freddie, close the Fed, and repeal ObamaCare in favor of the Whole Foods Plan.

That will add 8-10% of uninflated growth to GPD annually.

 

[The Infidel]

But they are NOT the only way these infrastructure needs are payed for huh?

Those who use them more and benifit more from their exsistance whould pay their fair share.

Should all the people who use and benefit from government pay their fair share too?

Where's that FLAG from bigrebnc that TM can beat on that hornet's nest with impunity?

 

[daveman]

So basically youre just fabricating an issue out of nothing. There is not a single legislative action that leads you to believe democrats want to cap wealth, however, you make a baseless hypothetical issue that democrats and Obama will one day try to possibly, maybe, over time, if given the chance try to enact a policy that caps wealth... Really, youre just talking out your ass.

Really? I guess you missed the bit where Congress and Obama decided some people shouldn't make over a half-million a year. Is it so far-fetched they'd eventually like to cap total wealth as well?


Hint: No.

Obama fashions a government of many czars


Obama And Geithner Get Ready To Cap Wall Street Pay


And whom are they to tell anyone what they can be paid for anything?

You hush. The proles need someone to do their thinking for them.

 

[BlindBoo]

"I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money"

I know you pseudo-conned type love to put everything into 2 second sound bytes but do try and take the time to understand the context of the above 11 words from a speech. Here is the very next line :

"But part of the American way is you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or you’re providing a good service."

It was in this section of his speech:

We had a system where some on Wall Street could take these risks without fear of failure, because they keep the profits when it was working, and as soon as it went south, they expected you to cover their losses. So it was one of those heads, they tail -- tails, you lose.

So they failed to consider that behind every dollar that they traded, all that leverage they were generating, acting like it was Monopoly money, there were real families out who were trying to finance a home, or pay for their child’s college, or open a business, or save for retirement. So what’s working fine for them wasn’t working for ordinary Americans. And we’ve learned that clearly. It doesn’t work out fine for the country. It’s got to change. (Applause.)

Now, what we’re doing -- I want to be clear, we’re not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that's fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money. (Laughter.) But part of the American way is you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or you’re providing a good service. We don't want people to stop fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow the economy.

I’ve said this before. I’ve said this on Wall Street just last week. I believe in the power of the free market. And I believe in a strong financial system. And when it’s working right, financial institutions, they help make possible families buying homes, and businesses growing, and new ideas taking flight. An entrepreneur may have a great idea, but he may need to borrow some money to make it happen. It would be hard for a lot of us to buy a house -- our first house, at least, if we weren’t able to take out a mortgage.

So there’s nothing wrong with a financial system that helps the economy expand. And there are a lot of good people in the financial industry who are doing things the right way. And it’s in our interest when those firms are strong and when they’re healthy.

But some of these institutions that operated irresponsibly, they’re not just threatening themselves -- they threaten the whole economy. And they threaten your dreams, your prospects, everything that you worked so hard to build.

So we just want them to operate in a way that’s fair and honest and in the open, so that we don’t have to go through what we’ve already gone through. (Applause.)

Remarks by the President on Wall Street Reform in Quincy, Illinois | The White House

So your argument is disingenuous at best. Typical of the pseudo-cons however.

 

[Meister]

My favorites speeches from the Uniter:


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWZkg-snbFE[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnnwJ1rgCnM[/ame]

 

[BlindBoo]

Yeap he was talking about the person realizing what is enough wealth.

Now I throughly believe there are people who have so much wealth it harms them as a human being.

That is not why I would deside to tax them.

I would deside to tax them because this country has to have revenue to support the needed infrastructure that makes these peoples money make them more money.

Those who benifit the most from the greasing of commerce by our infrastructure USE this infrastructure much more than most do.

You see that guy who uses the interstate to go back and forth to his job uses it.

The guy who owns a couple of companies that recieve goods and ship good in BIG ******* TRUCKS uses the infrastructure much more.

Why so many Americans want these people to get a free ride I will never know.

It all boils down to one thing, obama is a socialist. He said he wanted to spread the wealth around, that is what the health care bill is about. What about all the socialist stuff tacked onto the health care bill and others designed to take more of our freedoms away?

For the record, we've been spreading the wealth around since we began the progresive tax system, like every nation in the West. President Obama's goal was to repeal the Bush era tax cuts of 3% (Yep for proposed 3% increase the President has been call a redistributing socialist) that have proven to be unsustainable and have heaped debt upon our children for a generation at least. I beleive they should have dropped the mandated insurance and went with a public option. Authoritarians want you to believe the myths about Socialism. Socialism is a good thing.