I had plenty, looks like you have nothing for a response. You stupid Simps have been taught for so long to toss Slaver salad that you don't even think to question their 200+ year old beliefs. Amazing.
I would like that, but since it would dilute the power of the big states, it will never happen. The goal is to INCREASE the power of the big population centers.
That's how it's done.
Be honest. By "screw up another election" you mean elect a Republican.
It has nothing to do with slavers, you retard. Its pathetic how stuck on them you are. All you do is talk shit about our founders, but here you are. A disgusting, perverted immigrant trying to pussify everyone with your feelz and ignorance.I had plenty, looks like you have nothing for a response. You stupid Simps have been taught for so long to toss Slaver salad that you don't even think to question their 200+ year old beliefs. Amazing.
These aren't feelings you moron. It's just a pain old fact that they were slavers. You're the one getting all in your feelings over it.
So you think elite people should rule over people you deem unworthy. Thats exactly what i said from jump my guy, why are you being such a bitch about something you clearly believe in?
You're only better than anyone else in your own imagination. You're too frail and ignorant though to understand the objective truth of that statement.
Without the EC, our presidents would be chosen by LA, NYC, Miami/Dade, and Chicago, no one else's vote would count. The founders understood that and created the EC, it's too bad the so many Americans, like you, are ignorant to the reasons for the EC.
They vote by state delegation. That would favor the Republicans.
Not Lakookta's fault, he just wants to ensure continuation of all his free stuff. Trump is a threat to freeloaders.
You're a just a moron. Eliminating the EC would only make it so the person who won the most votes would win. What the Founders understood was that without giving slave states more representation based on the number of slaves they had that slave states would be out voted by non slave states. That's why the number of slaves you had is what added to your electoral college count and not the size of your population as compared to others.
It had nothing to do with slavery, it was set up so that the small population states would have a voice in national elections. The founders did not want small densely populated states and cities to control the national elections. They got it right. We do not have a pure democracy we have a representative republic. As a minority, you liberals would not like a pure democracy where your far left views could be voted down by the majority, but in our republic even you fools have a voice and that is how it should be. All viewpoints given equal time and volume. Sadly, our media no longer practices free speech.
It's right there in your constitution you dumb fearful Simp. The calculations for electoral college votes had nothing to do with comparing population sizes between smaller and larger states but in adding up populations and then adding 3/4s for every slave. History is what is guy. Try not to be such a little bitch about it.
actually it was 3/5ths. Because the people in those days were all ignorant as to human values. The EC concept is valid no matter how slaves were counted in the 1700s.
and your juvenile insult attempts fail as usual.
Yep. 3/5s, that's a typo and what's invalid was your ignorant defense of it which was historically inaccurate and bit Snowflakey. You right wingers are always trying to carve out these safe spaces where you pretend history was something other than what it was.
Why is that a good thing? Why should Montana have the same power as Texas in the Senate? Why should Rhode Island have more electoral power per voter than Texas in the Presidential election?
I love when right wingers admit that they think slavers are end all be all to political thought.
