While I do agree with this, you a making an apples to oranges comparison here, is also why there is a different standard in court for when you sue someone for libel or defamation.
If I write or start saying terrible shit about my neighbor, he can sue me. If I do it about Donald Trump? Well, he has to lump it. There is a difference.
If someone is a public figure, they should be used to and accustomed to, and be tolerant of, free speech about them, no matter if they are men, women, children, whomever.
And we all know, Chris Rock is a professional comic, making jokes, and roasting folks is his trade. Was the joke in poor taste? Sure, probably. But it wasn't about some nobody, it was about someone famous, so thus? Fair game.
All of these individuals have more wealth and security in a year or two, than many Americans will see in a lifetime, they can afford to have a bruised ego and a bit of a hurt feeling here and there.
We live in a civilized society, and thus, they are role models for OUR children, and are expected to model behavior for the larger society removed from them. They are in the public space, broadcasting their behavior to millions. . . they ARE the propagandists and models for all. IOW? YOU CAN'T take the Oscars out of it, THAT is the point of all of this, they are famous.
Free speech is a value we have agreed to in a liberal democracy, and you don't go off half cocked anytime you feel your honor has been trampled, or you feel you have been disrespected. . . because another value we have agreed to in this nation?
. .. . . is the right to bear arms.