Will Pam Bondi Prosecute Michael Byrd For Murder?

[Chillicothe]

There was no excuse for the coward cop murdering Ashley Babbitt.

We can find agreement, poster Finger.
There was no excuse.
There didn't need to be.
After all, the officer has a legitimate credible justifiable reason to stop the threat to our Representatives.
And he did so.
He stopped the tip-of-the-spear......and his act persuaded the rest of her mobster cohort to reflect on their intentions. No others attempted to charge through that breached opening.

Which made it at minimum a 'good shoot'.......perhaps, a heroic one.

 

[Chillicothe]

Your assertion that Ashley Babbitt was somehow running at or leaping at the police and attacking is false. She was climbing through a window and posing no threat

Ummm, my poor avatar has never ever suggested Babbitt was "running at" the officers. Please do not put your thoughts and words into my avatar's writings.

Now, did she charge at the officers?
Yupper. She did.
She wasn't backing away.
She wasn't retreating.
She wasn't standing in place.
She went forward.
She suddenly and quickly leaped towards those officers.
And after being warned that a gun was being brandished, being told to go away, to back off, to leave......she chose, instead, to leap at the officers.

In my humble opinion, leaping towards an officer who is pointing a gun at you is, I would conjecture, seldom a prudent thing to do.

Babbitt is dead because of Babbitt.

 

[Contumacious]

We can find agreement, poster Finger.
There was no excuse.
There didn't need to be.
After all, the officer has a legitimate credible justifiable reason to stop the threat to our Representatives.
And he did so.
He stopped the tip-of-the-spear......and his act persuaded the rest of her mobster cohort to reflect on their intentions. No others attempted to charge through that breached opening.

Which made it at minimum a 'good shoot'.......perhaps, a heroic one.

PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

the standards for the use of deadly force by police officers were set forth in Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). Officers may use force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist and may use only the level of force that a reasonable officer on the scene would use under the same or similar circumstances

NONE of those factors were present when Byrd slaughtered Ashli

 

[Contumacious]

"

10 minutes ago

[SIZE=7]Contumacious[/SIZE]"​

---------------------------------------


So, poster Contumacious what is 'fake' about post #574.

Explain your assertion that it is fake.

SEE POST #576 - Stop Stonewalling

 

[Chillicothe]

only the level of force that a reasonable officer on the scene would use under the same or similar circumstances

And, I would conjecture that a reasonable officer after hearing of extreme violence nearby with officers down and injured, that the security line had been lost to the violent mob......and observing the extreme violence then being administered to the barrier just feet away despite warnings to all rioters to leave, to go away......and yet, one of 'em charging through a criminally created breach....well, yeah, I think the 'reasonableness' of forcefully and promptly stopping the mob's point-man rapidly coming through the breach...and stopping with the means at immediate hand was more than self-evident.

IMHO

 

[Leo123]

And, I would conjecture that a reasonable officer after hearing of extreme violence nearby with officers down and injured, that the security line had been lost to the violent mob......and observing the extreme violence then being administered to the barrier just feet away despite warnings to all rioters to leave, to go away......and yet, one of 'em charging through a criminally created breach....well, yeah, I think the 'reasonableness' of forcefully and promptly stopping the mob's point-man rapidly coming through the breach...and stopping with the means at immediate hand was more than self-evident.

IMHO

Guesswork, you weren't there.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Stop Stonewalling"

No stonewalling whatsoever.
But the issue at hand remains, poster Contumacious.
Ashli Babbit did NOT have the right to protest in the manner she did.
She illegally entered the Capitol of the United States of America.
She joined, participate in, and contributed to a violent mob that was intent on getting ahold of Congressional Representatives.....(witness the 'Hang Pence' threats, the 'shoot Nancy in the head' threats), and then near the end of her short life.....her contribution to the violent breaching of a barricade within our Capitol, her disobedience to shouted police demands to leave, and then her charging through that breach towards the officers......well, amigo, that ain't "protest".

Those are crimes.

Duh!!

 

[Concerned American]

You know, the guy that shot Ashli Babbitt, Air Force Veteran, in the head for the heinous crime of being helped through a broken window?



View attachment 1045990

She's the one with the American Flag on her shoulder. Which is proof, in and of itself, that she must be a bad person.

So, Michael Byrd took it upon himself to shoot her. In the throat. She died. Horribly

After which, the Brave people that run DC decided to house him at an Air Force Base. In a very, VERY expensive suite. Paid for by -- Us. The American People.

I just thought of it again because of this article at Newsmax.

So, what do you think? Will Byrd be prosecuted for the murder he committed?

If there is justice in this world, that murdering POS will go to prison for life. I hope he outs Piglosi and she gets thrown in the slammer too.

 

[Chillicothe]

"you weren't there."

------------------------------------------------------------------

Oooops, my bad!

I should have typed "I would conjecture" in all caps.
In order to be clearer in my expressed opinion...
............. .....for some of our posters here,

 

[Blisterfinger]

Ummm, my poor avatar has never ever suggested Babbitt was "running at" the officers. Please do not put your thoughts and words into my avatar's writings.

Now, did she charge at the officers?
Yupper. She did.
She wasn't backing away.
She wasn't retreating.
She wasn't standing in place.
She went forward.
She suddenly and quickly leaped towards those officers.
And after being warned that a gun was being brandished, being told to go away, to back off, to leave......she chose, instead, to leap at the officers.

In my humble opinion, leaping towards an officer who is pointing a gun at you is, I would conjecture, seldom a prudent thing to do.

We can find agreement, poster Finger.
There was no excuse.
There didn't need to be.
After all, the officer has a legitimate credible justifiable reason to stop the threat to our Representatives.
And he did so.
He stopped the tip-of-the-spear......and his act persuaded the rest of her mobster cohort to reflect on their intentions. No others attempted to charge through that breached opening.

Which made it at minimum a 'good shoot'.......perhaps, a heroic one.

Actually he did not have a legitimate, credible, justifiable reason to kill Ashley Babbitt. There were other alternatives , such as taser and standing in front of her climbing through the window pointing a gun in her face . Surely you could use your brain for just a moment and figure this out for yourself if you weren't so jaded . As much as you wish in your bloodthirsty and authoritarian way that this was warranted it was not. . Not to worry we will give officer bird a fair trial.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Ummm, my poor avatar has never ever suggested Babbitt was "running at" the officers. Please do not put your thoughts and words into my avatar's writings.

Now, did she charge at the officers?
Yupper. .....she chose, instead, to leap at the officers.

In my humble opinion, leaping towards an officer who is pointing a gun at you is, I would conjecture, seldom a prudent thing to do.

You continue to lie in your bloodthirsty arrogant way. Maybe you should revisit the video and you won't see Ashley leaping or charging at officers. You continue to make up a story that doesn't exist. Is your narrative that important to throw away all your credibility? What little credibility you have. You are fake news

 

[Blisterfinger]

------------------------------------------------------------------

Oooops, my bad!

I should have typed "I would conjecture" in all caps.
In order to be clearer in my expressed opinion...
............. .....for some of our posters here,

Maybe you should just stop acting so stupid

 

[AZrailwhale]

A lie, of course. The police all felt threatened that day, as 140 of them were assaulted by the violent mob.

And the threat was the violent mob, not just the one idiot traitor Babbit.

Who do I believe? You or the three videos taken at the time. I think I will go with the three independent sources rather than the ideologue who spends his life calling people names on the internet,

 

[AZrailwhale]

If the only person who felt threatened was Bryd, then why did the two police officers who had their backs against the door, guarding it, leave and let the mob continue its assault after being informed by one of the mobsters that they weren't there for them (the two officers guarding the door), that they wanted to see them go home to their families that night.

Do you think they moved out of the way and acquiesced to the mob out of courtesy and not because they were threatened by them?

I watched a video where one of the mobsters repeatedly hit the door/window with his fist right beside the face of one of the officers. That's the kind of crap domestic violence abusers do, letting their victim see how hard they will get hit it they decide to hit them instead of the wall of whatever it is they're slamming their fist against.

Were the officers hurt? Did they feel the need to even draw their pistols? Did they even feel the need to bar the crowd access to the area? In the journalist’s video shown earlier in this thread they are having calm and reasoned discussions with members of the crowd who offered them bottles of water. When they walked away, the crowd didn’t hinder or attack them.

 

[Contumacious]

And, I would conjecture that a reasonable officer after hearing of extreme violence nearby with officers down and injured, that the security line had been lost to the violent mob......and observing the extreme violence then being administered to the barrier just feet away despite warnings to all rioters to leave, to go away......and yet, one of 'em charging through a criminally created breach....well, yeah, I think the 'reasonableness' of forcefully and promptly stopping the mob's point-man rapidly coming through the breach...and stopping with the means at immediate hand was more than self-evident.

IMHO

Lt. Byrd later confessed that he shot Ashli before seeing her hands or assessing her intentions or even identifying her as female. Ashli was unarmed. Her hands were up in the air, empty, and in plain view of Lt. Byrd and other officers in the lobby.

Ashli Babbitt Lawsuit Update! - Judicial Watch

New Judicial Watch Book Rights and Freedoms in Peril, Goes on Sale October 15Since the release of my most recent Judicial Watch book, A Republic Under Assault, the Left has taken extraordinary steps to eradicate American liberty, motivated by a radical ideology whose adherents occupy the...

www.judicialwatch.org

 

[Contumacious]

No stonewalling whatsoever.
But the issue at hand remains, poster Contumacious.
Ashli Babbit did NOT have the right to protest in the manner she did.
She illegally entered the Capitol of the United States of America.
She joined, participate in, and contributed to a violent mob that was intent on getting ahold of Congressional Representatives.....(witness the 'Hang Pence' threats, the 'shoot Nancy in the head' threats), and then near the end of her short life.....her contribution to the violent breaching of a barricade within our Capitol, her disobedience to shouted police demands to leave, and then her charging through that breach towards the officers......well, amigo, that ain't "protest".

Those are crimes.

Duh!!

Ashli Babbitt , an Air Force Veteran , had sworn to support and defend the Constitution AGAINST ALL ENEMIES ..... DOMESTIC

on January 6, 2021 President Trump had a right to a Twelfth Amendment and a 3 USC 15 Hearing , the same were denied.

The Federal Court in Atlanta Ga recently heard evidence and recognized that voting machines are hackable and that votes can be switch from one candidate to another in real time WITHOUT creating traceable evidence.

So pursuant to her Constitutional Right to vote , to election integrity and to vote for the candidate of her choice she had the absolute right to protest .

 

[Chillicothe]

"...she had the absolute right to protest ."

But not in the manner, degree of violence, or criminal behavior that she chose to employ.

Duh!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She did not illegally enter the capitol.

Lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You or the three videos taken at the time

No difference. You got lied to and fooled.

Again.

 

[otto105]

Ashli Babbitt , an Air Force Veteran , had sworn to support and defend the Constitution AGAINST ALL ENEMIES ..... DOMESTIC

on January 6, 2021 President Trump had a right to a Twelfth Amendment and a 3 USC 15 Hearing , the same were denied.

The Federal Court in Atlanta Ga recently heard evidence and recognized that voting machines are hackable and that votes can be switch from one candidate to another in real time WITHOUT creating traceable evidence.

So pursuant to her Constitutional Right to vote , to election integrity and to vote for the candidate of her choice she had the absolute right to protest .

Shoot that bitch again.