Will Lindsey Halligan's confirmation hearing testimony be a repeat of Pam Bondi's?

[berg80]

Trump has never been proven to have done anything illegal as prez.

Partly because Jack Smith's prosecution of the plot to steal the election never occurred. And partly because no sitting prez can be indicted according to a yet untested OLC ruling bolstered by the SC creating immunity for the prez out of whole cloth. But trump's actions have violated numerous laws during 2.0 and he has committed numerous impeachable offenses. Most recently by demanding his enemies be prosecuted.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Partly because Jack Smith's prosecution of the plot to steal the election never occurred.

Because there was never any evidence of a "plot to steal the election," which is why a partisan hack like Smith, who has been smacked more times than Betty Page.

And partly because no sitting prez can be indicted according to a yet untested OLC ruling bolstered by the SC creating immunity for the prez out of whole cloth. But trump's actions have violated numerous laws during 2.0 and he has committed numerous impeachable offenses. Most recently by demanding his enemies be prosecuted.

Smith had four years to indict the Prez while he was ex-prez.

No one is fooled. You know this yourself. The point of the endless investigations and theatened prosecutions was to punish Trump through he process, because there was no evidence for a conviction.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If the Dem Senators treat Halligan the way that the treated Bondi, then she will likely react in a similar manner.

Common sense.

If the Blue mysogynist thugs want respect from women, let them clean up their act.

 

[berg80]

Because there was never any evidence of a "plot to steal the election,"

Your woeful ignorance could be remedied if you took some time to read thru the indictment.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

 

[berg80]

If the Dem Senators treat Halligan the way that the treated Bondi, then she will likely react in a similar manner.

If Halligan refuses to answer legitimate questions like the blonde sock puppet did it will be yet another sign of contempt this regime has for congressional oversight the regular order.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If Halligan refuses to answer legitimate questions like the blonde sock puppet did it will be yet another sign of contempt this regime has for congressional oversight the regular order.

"What did Homan do with the $50,000 bribe he is on tape accepting?" is not a legitimate question unless you are ready to play the tape.

 

[WEATHER53]

Good looking and accomplished women who can think and lib loons don’t know what such a person is.

 

[Rawley]

For the unaware, Halligan has been picked to replace Erik Seibert, the US Attorney formerly handling the prosecution of Letisha James, Erik having just resigned.

Sen. Chris Coons asked some very pointed questions of Pam when she testified.

Senator Coons presses Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi for reassurance that she will maintain Department of Justice’s independence during Judiciary confirmation hearing

Senator Coons: Thank you. Let me, if I might … refer you back to Senator [Dick] Durbin’s [D-Ill.] opening comments about previous attorneys general – our former colleague Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr – I don’t think it’s credible to say that it may never happen that the president-elect would direct an unethical or illegal act. I think both of those attorneys general found themselves crosswise with the then-president by doing things he didn’t welcome or approve of. Just answer the question for me, if you would: I know you may not expect it; I know you wouldn’t have accepted this nomination if you thought it possible – but let’s imagine that once again, President-elect Trump issues a directive or order to you or to the FBI director that is outside the boundaries of ethics or law. What will you do?

Bondi: Senator, I will never speak on a hypothetical, especially one saying that the President would do something illegal. What I can tell you is my duty, if confirmed as the Attorney General, will be to the Constitution and the United States of America, and the most important oath, part of that oath, that I will take are the last four words: “So help me God.”
https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/p...endence-during-judiciary-confirmation-hearing

For the purposes of this discussion let's not dwell on Bondi having lied during her testimony. I'm more curious about how Halligan will answer what I assume will be questions about how she will handle pressure from trump when she too can not find enough evidence to charge James with mortgage fraud? You know.........seeing as what just happened.........trump's now deleted post notwithstanding.......is trump pressured Bondi to get on with the prosecution of his enemies......a lack of evidence be damned.

Will she say something like, "I can't imagine the prez asking me to do anything illegal," as Pam did? How can she? So how will she dodge the inevitable questions?

Just curious, what do you think Bondi has done that is illegal?

 

[Rawley]

If Halligan refuses to answer legitimate questions like the blonde sock puppet did it will be yet another sign of contempt this regime has for congressional oversight the regular order.

It is so refreshing when loons drop the veil and expose their misogyny for all to see.

 

[berg80]

"What did Homan do with the $50,000 bribe he is on tape accepting?" is not a legitimate question unless you are ready to play the tape.

I don't have the tape. Did you think I did? The DoJ has the tape. I fully expect it to be subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee after the midterms.

 

[berg80]

Good looking and accomplished women who can think and lib loons don’t know what such a person is.

Wouldn't she have to be legally appointed before she fails to get confirmed?

 

[Seymour Flops]

I don't have the tape. Did you think I did?

No I think it is nonexistent as far as being a tape of tom holman, accepting a bribe.

I'm sure there is "a tape" of Tom Homan. He's recorded almost everywhere.He goes in public.

The DoJ has the tape. I fully expect it to be subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee after the midterms.

Okay.

Why necro this thread now?

Get back to us when you can produce the tape or a link to it.

 

[berg80]

Okay.

Get back to us when you can produce the tape or a link to it.

As I said, I don't have it. Did you think I did?

 

[berg80]

Why necro this thread now?

You may not have heard but charges against Comey and James have been dismissed cuz it turns out Lindsey was never really a US Attorney.

 

[Seymour Flops]

As I said, I don't have it. Did you think I did?

Okay.

So we have nothing to go on.What is your point?

Why necro this thread now?

Get back to us when you got something.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You may not have heard but charges against Comey and James have been dismissed cuz it turns out Lindsey was never really a US Attorney.

They will be reinstated by a higher court, soon.

What dies that have to do with the nonexistant tape of Homan taking a fifty thousand dollar bribe?

 

[berg80]

They will be reinstated by a higher court, soon.

What dies that have to do with the nonexistant tape of Homan taking a fifty thousand dollar bribe?

Just because the DoJ won't produce the tape doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

 

[Delldude]

Just because the DoJ won't produce the tape doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Paper trail on the 50k? Screw the tape.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Just because the DoJ won't produce the tape doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Sure, but what DOES mean that it exists? What evidence is there for its existence?

Meaning a tape of Tom Homan taking a fifty thousand dollar bribe, not any tape of Tom Homan.

 

[berg80]

Sure, but what DOES mean that it exists? What evidence is there for its existence?

Meaning a tape of Tom Homan taking a fifty thousand dollar bribe, not any tape of Tom Homan.

AI Overview

The "Homan tape" refers to recordings of a meeting where former acting ICE Director Tom Homan allegedly accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents. The tape is believed to have been made in September 2024 and is part of a federal investigation into bribery. The precise location of the tape is unknown, but it is in the possession of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI, as confirmed by a lawsuit seeking its production.

GFY.