Will Don Lemon go to jail ?

[struth]

The fact is he didn’t use force, threat of force or physical obstruction to block anyone from doing anything.

You tried making some dumb claim about forcing his way into the church, but it’s obviously untrue.

The fact is he did, he forced his way in to the church

And his physical presence in the church obstructed folks there from freely exercising their faith

Thus he’s in deep trouble

 

[Marener]

The fact is he did, he forced his way in to the church

The door was open, dipshit.

And his physical presence in the church obstructed folks there from freely exercising their faith

What an idiotic thing to say. A person existing in a church does not prevent religious freedom.

Thus he’s in deep trouble

You’re a moron.

 

[struth]

The door was open, dipshit.

What an idiotic thing to say. A person existing in a church does not prevent religious freedom.

You are a moron.

Opened by who?

Agreed but a person being part of a mob there to disrupt the service and protest ice does

Look, save it for the jury

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Maybe you guys should try st least once to be honest. You always leave details out, or just be super vague so we don’t really know what you’re talking about.


Yeah, you can be outside and violate the FACE act if you are physically obstructing the doors which is what these individuals are usually doing.

You probably need to read the FACE act closer because when I read it, I don’t see anything about it being illegal to ask people questions they don’t like.

It's not about asking people questions, it's about where they chose to ask them (In a church) and when (during a worship service).

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

The door was open because church services are open to the public.

For WORSHIP, not for interrogations by a screaming ******* mob.

Haven’t you ever been to a church?

Have you?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

You tried and failed, because they did not forcibly enter.

His presence was not an obstruction.

But they were asked to leave and they didn't. That's trespassing.

 

[Marener]

It's not about asking people questions, it's about where they chose to ask them (In a church) and when (during a worship service).

It’s a felony to ask someone a question during a church service.

That’s what you’re saying.

Jesus Christ, you guys are stupid.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

It’s a felony to ask someone a question during a church service.

That’s what you’re saying.

Jesus Christ, you guys are stupid.

Don't be an idiot. I never said or suggested it was a felony.

 

[protectionist]

I haven’t kept up with it. From what I saw, he was just interviewing people, but I didn’t see any “protesting” from him.

I'm not going to post Lemon's quote for the 10th time in this thread. look through it - you can find it easily - it's blue, italics bold.

 

[protectionist]

The door was open, dipshit.

What an idiotic thing to say. A person existing in a church does not prevent religious freedom.

You’re a moron.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I'd have no problem with Lemon going to jail, but I doubt it'll happen.. if not just for optics. To be honest, Trump might have been foolish for focusing on him at all. He should have just let his DOJ and branch go after him. Lemon is clearly just pulling a Smollet here.. I think the guy has a martyr complex. This is just my opinion, but I think he was in contact with these people and wanted confrontation and to be charged with something so he could fight Trump. I think he can't get out of the spotlight, he's addicted to attention.

 

[protectionist]

I'd have no problem with Lemon going to jail, but I doubt it'll happen.. if not just for optics. To be honest, Trump might have been foolish for focusing on him at all. He should have just let his DOJ and branch go after him. Lemon is clearly just pulling a Smollet here.. I think the guy has a martyr complex. This is just my opinion, but I think he was in contact with these people and wanted confrontation and to be charged with something so he could fight Trump. I think he can't get out of the spotlight, he's addicted to attention.

Sounds about right. Has-been struggling to climb out of obscurity.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Yes, if he gets an honest objective jury & judge.

No, if he gets a judge & jury full of liberals, who don't care one iota if he's guilty or not.

If he doesn’t then the entire nobody is above the law narrative the left chants turns to shit.

 

[forkup]

All depends on who's in that courtroom. "Justice" in America has become more of a WHO thing, then a WHAT thing.

When you have something of SUBSTANCE to post, there may be a chance, that perhaps, there could be a possibility, that I just might read it.
But I wouldn't place any bets if I were you.

I see.

Giving a direct answer to an OP you started titled "Will Don Lemon be going to jail."

Attributing percentages for each possible outcome, being dismissal before trial (60 percent), not guilty verdict (39 percent), guilty verdict (less than 1 percent), Lemon actually going to jail (non-existent.)

Percentages I'm willing to stand by by offering you a bet, giving you better than 40 to 1 odds is not substancial enough for you?

It's hillarious that you seem to think the dismissal of the premise of your own OP signals anything but your cowardice.

 

[protectionist]

I see.

Giving a direct answer to an OP you started titled "Will Don Lemon be going to jail."

Attributing percentages for each possible outcome, being dismissal before trial (60 percent), not guilty verdict (39 percent), guilty verdict (less than 1 percent), Lemon actually going to jail (non-existent.)

Percentages I'm willing to stand by by offering you a bet, giving you better than 40 to 1 odds is not substancial enough for you?

It's hillarious that you seem to think the dismissal of the premise of your own OP signals anything but your cowardice.

By using the word "cowardice" it's pretty clear that I got deep under your skin somehow. Well boy, you'll just have to learn that in this world, and in this forum, things don't always go your way.

The OP I wrote got 6 ratings, all positive, including 3 winners. So all those people are fully on board with what I said.
So you wanna call them cowards too ? And where did you get the idea that I dismissed my OP ?

I don't dismiss one word of it. Here it is AGAIN >>

Will Don Lemon go to jail ?

Yes, if he gets an honest objective jury & judge.

No, if he gets a judge & jury full of liberals, who don't care one iota if he's guilty or not.

I said it then, I say it now. I post what I choose to post, not what you choose.
I think what I think, not what you think.

As for your opinion of whether Lemon will go to jail, you're entitled to your opinion. No problem about that. My opinion is that I don't think you have any idea if Lemon will go to jail or not, and you're just coming in here trying to be some kind of a tough guy. I see you as a buffoon.

 

[struth]

“In the United States of America, we do not prosecute journalists for doing their job. That happens in Russia, China, Iran and other authoritarian regimes. And yet the government sold this unconstitutional mess to the grand jury,” the motion states.

The motion called the government’s actions “highly unusual” and “nakedly political” and pointed out that multiple judges declined the charges before the Trump administration worked around them and presented the case to a grand jury.

“The resulting two-count felony indictment, returned on January 29, does not bear the name of a single line prosecutor from this District’s U.S. Attorney’s Office. That is irregular and represents an unusual departure from the many years’ collaboration between the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Civil Rights Division throughout multiple administrations, particularly in civil rights cases and cases that are notable in the Minnesota community,” the motion states.

Don Lemon pleads not guilty to Minnesota church protest charges

The former CNN anchor was inside a church on Jan. 18 when protesters disrupted a service. A pastor there, demonstrators alleged, worked for ICE.

www.nbcnews.com

Not so irregular in the error of trump since line prosecutors have routinely refused to be associated with bogus charges brought by the regime against political enemies.

Since when did it become irregular to go to a grand jury in the United States to get indictments??

 

[forkup]

By using the word "cowardice" it's pretty clear that I got deep under your skin somehow. Well boy, you'll just have to learn that in this world, and in this forum, things don't always go your way.

The OP I wrote got 6 ratings, all positive, including 3 winners. So all those people are fully on board with what I said.
So you wanna call them cowards too ? And where did you get the idea that I dismissed my OP ?

I don't dismiss one word of it. Here it is AGAIN >>

Will Don Lemon go to jail ?

Yes, if he gets an honest objective jury & judge.

No, if he gets a judge & jury full of liberals, who don't care one iota if he's guilty or not.

I said it then, I say it now. I post what I choose to post, not what you choose.
I think what I think, not what you think.

As for your opinion of whether Lemon will go to jail, you're entitled to your opinion. No problem about that. My opinion is that I don't think you have any idea if Lemon will go to jail or not, and you're just coming in here trying to be some kind of a tough guy. I see you as a buffoon.

You didn't get under my skin at all. Nor do I care about how many like minded people on here react positively on your OP.

The simple fact is that we post in 2 different registers. You are here to signal loyalty to your clan. To garner "positive replies" by people who already belief like you do.

I'm here to see if people who believe different from me have an actual point that I'm just not seeing.

Ones if becomes clear to me that they can't defend what they belief in good faith, my goal becomes making that clear. And after I achieved that goal I have no problem calling a spade a spade.

I called you a coward not out of anger or frustration. I called you a coward because you aren't prepared to stand by your own position, professed with great certainty even when more than 40 to 1 odds are offered. That is objectively an act of cowardice.

 

[protectionist]

You didn't get under my skin at all. Nor do I care about how many like minded people on here react positively on your OP.

The simple fact is that we post in 2 different registers. You are here to signal loyalty to your clan. To garner "positive replies" by people who already belief like you do.

I'm here to see if people who believe different from me have an actual point that I'm just not seeing.

Ones if becomes clear to me that they can't defend what they belief in good faith, my goal becomes making that clear. And after I achieved that goal I have no problem calling a spade a spade.

I called you a coward not out of anger or frustration. I called you a coward because you aren't prepared to stand by your own position, professed with great certainty even when more than 40 to 1 odds are offered. That is objectively an act of cowardice.

I stood by my own position in Post # 395, by reposting my position again.
Are you on drugs or something ? If so, not my problem.
I still say you are an egotistical buffoon.

 

[forkup]

I stood by my own position in Post # 395, by reposting my position again.
Are you on drugs or something ? If so, not my problem.
I still say you are an egotistical buffoon.

Re-posting the same unfalsifiable claim isn’t “standing by your position.”
It’s just hitting copy-paste harder.

You didn’t add standards.
You didn’t add probabilities.
You didn’t accept risk.

You just repeated: “I’m right unless reality disagrees, in which case reality is biased.”
Calling that substance doesn’t make it so, and calling me names doesn’t change the fact that when offered a real-world test with 40-to-1 odds in your favor, you declined.

That’s not confidence.
That’s commitment without courage.
Anyway, feel free to repost it a third time. Maybe repetition will succeed where reasoning didn’t.

 

[struth]

My guess is Don Lemon's sentencing guidelines won't actually call for active jail time, so he might avoid prison and just get probation