Will an Obama loss turn to rioting?

[JakeStarkey]

In other words, you would be happy with segregation, police beatings, no regulated right for reproductive control, and so forth.

Thanks for being honest.

jtpr, the conservatives supported the bad old days, GOP and Dems alike, and the mods and libs supported the Constitution in getting rid of the bad old days. Which side would you have been on?

I disagree with your assesment that the bad old days where not the days that the Constitution was followed and believed in. I am a firm beleiver in the Constitution AS WRITTEN, and am not a big fan of the 9 whores interpretation of said document. We are all English speakers here for the most part and therefore don't need lawyers and judges to interpret the Constitution for us.

 

[jtpr312]

Sure, and it was 'libruls' that bombed the church and killed the little girls? Oh yeah, some people were demanding that they be allowed to vote as the Constitution specifies. So it is their fault that people like you bombed the church.

We understand people like you all too well. Night riding sheet wearing assholes that hide their crimes in the "they made me do it" whine.

Dumbass, they were Southern Democrats where you unaware of that fact?

Like I've told other here son, you have the world at your fingertips, don't use it to spew nonsense or look at porn, educate yourself.

Well educated, and getting more so daily. And I was alive during this period. Born in '43, and remember well when people like President Obama and General Powell would have had to ride in the back of the bus in the south and even in many cities in the north.

I am fully aware of who the Dixiecrats were, and who they are today, in the GOP.

Evidently not so well educated and having a long way to go. We are not discussing who or what makes up the Republican party today, though if memory serves me correctly, former KKK member and US Senator, Robert Byrd, was a member of the Democratic Party up until his death in 2010 and hailed as a great and honered associate of democrats like obama and biden who both honored him at his funeral. Irelevent though, as my assertion was that the people who have rioted in this nation in the past 45 years where democrats or people who tradionally support and are in turn supported by the democratic party and that most cases of violent civil disobediance in the same time fram where carried out by like minded individuals. Now rather than stick to the topic of civil disobediance and rioting in the past 45yrs, you bring up criminal acts which have nothing to do with the topic at hand, which is rioting and civil disobediance, nor are within the time frame being discussed for that matter, as your iirelevent to the topic crime happened 50yrs ago. Evidently you are not so well educated as a well educated person would argue the topic at hand, not bring up irelevent topics from left field to refute my statements. Now if you would like to discuss the wrongs perpetrated by the Southern whites, the negroes and the Northern white agitators and communsits during the civil rights movement, which I may add was supported fully by the Republican Party, we can do so. If you wish to discuss the ramifications of the War of Northern Aggression and the later occupation by Federal Troops of Soveriegn Southern States on the plight of the negro in Southern America circa early 1960's we can do that also, but at this time that is not the topic of discussion, try to keep up.

 

[jtpr312]

In other words, you would be happy with segregation, police beatings, no regulated right for reproductive control, and so forth.

Thanks for being honest.

jtpr, the conservatives supported the bad old days, GOP and Dems alike, and the mods and libs supported the Constitution in getting rid of the bad old days. Which side would you have been on?

I disagree with your assesment that the bad old days where not the days that the Constitution was followed and believed in. I am a firm beleiver in the Constitution AS WRITTEN, and am not a big fan of the 9 whores interpretation of said document. We are all English speakers here for the most part and therefore don't need lawyers and judges to interpret the Constitution for us.

What is it with you and oldrocks? Are the two of you just ignorant and actually infer nonsense that was not even remotely implied by the speaker or do you always make it a habit of putting your own words in the mouths of others?
Here's the facts about me son. If I have something to say, I will most certainly say it straight out no matter how politically incorrect it is. Do I beleive in segregation? I believe people segregate themselves all on their own without govt help, but I also beleive that any man that works hard, obeys the law, repects my person and property and teaches his children to do the same can be my neighbor any day of the week. I am a firm beleiver that I would rather have a decent, honest, law abiding, hard working negro as a neighbor than to have some meth smoking, 10 half built cars in his yard, 11 dirty little kids running around with no supervision, low life as a neighbor, just because the low life is white like me. Do I believe in police beatings? Often times I think the Police show way too much restraint such as in the many cities with the ows low lifes running around defectating and urinating in the streets, raping woman, doing drugs, impedeing traffic, hurting decent hard working people's businesses and tuning many city streets and parks into trash dumps and believe the Police should have been allowed to break up these demostrations with mounted units, dogs and tear gas. On the other hand I don't think the Police beating a man in a wheel chair half to death after tasing him is a good policy. As for a right to regulated reproductive control. I'm all for a person's right to control their reproductive rights, which is why I support no bans on birth control. Though I don't see anywhere in the US Constitution that says your right to reproductive control means you have a right for the Tax Payer to pay for your birth control or that your right to reproductive control trumps an innocent baby's right to be protected from murder. Now in the future you can ask how I think on a subject I'm not shy I'll answer, but it would be best for all concerned not to put words in my mouth. That is unless you two really are so ignorant that you infered all that nonsense from what I said in which case you're forgiven.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your reply is two-edged. Keep it in mind. Ignorance appears to be one of your weaknesses. I will hang on to your "love me" diatribe.

I think you are a fraud, and time will show us all just how much of a fraud you are.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Must a lurn'd it from da KKK and dere bros.

Yep, it's been a Democratic staple for over 150 years...

So today's KKK is made up of Democrats?

Today's KKK has about 2,000 members according to the hate hustler Morris Dees, and I don't know any of them so I can't tell you what their political persuasion is, but I can tell you that there are so few of them that they couldn't change the outcome of an election for dogcatcher.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Sure, and it was 'libruls' that bombed the church and killed the little girls? Oh yeah, some people were demanding that they be allowed to vote as the Constitution specifies. So it is their fault that people like you bombed the church.

We understand people like you all too well. Night riding sheet wearing assholes that hide their crimes in the "they made me do it" whine.

I'll lay 10 to 1 it was democrats, Salty!

 

[GuyPinestra]

Sure, and it was 'libruls' that bombed the church and killed the little girls? Oh yeah, some people were demanding that they be allowed to vote as the Constitution specifies. So it is their fault that people like you bombed the church.

We understand people like you all too well. Night riding sheet wearing assholes that hide their crimes in the "they made me do it" whine.

Dumbass, they were Southern Democrats where you unaware of that fact?

Like I've told other here son, you have the world at your fingertips, don't use it to spew nonsense or look at porn, educate yourself.

Well educated, and getting more so daily. And I was alive during this period. Born in '43, and remember well when people like President Obama and General Powell would have had to ride in the back of the bus in the south and even in many cities in the north.

I am fully aware of who the Dixiecrats were, and who they are today, in the GOP.

Prove it!! There were plenty of Dixiecrats that voted against the Civil Rights Act, you shouldn't have ANY trouble naming the dozens of them that joined the Republican Party.

Tell you what, 'dozens' is a pretty tall order, so name half a dozen.

You know, half a dozen might be too much to ask, I'll settle for 3.

Three names, or admit you're full of shit!

 

[JakeStarkey]

And it was Democrats who passed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, despite the fierce opposition from its southern wing. Even the GOP in the South voted at higer %s against the acts than their Dem counterparts in the South.

Forget that?

 

[GuyPinestra]

And it was Democrats who passed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, despite the fierce opposition from its southern wing. Even the GOP in the South voted at higer %s against the acts than their Dem counterparts in the South.

Forget that?

Nope, I sure didn't, but I doubt you even have a point in bringing it up. Here's the Southern House vote totals from Wiki...
The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

Doesn't look to me like Southerners liked Republicans at all back then or there would have been more people electing them, don't you think?

 

[jtpr312]

And it was Democrats who passed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, despite the fierce opposition from its southern wing. Even the GOP in the South voted at higer %s against the acts than their Dem counterparts in the South.

Forget that?

Forgot it? I never knew it.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964

The Senate version:[16]
Totals are;
Yea/Nay

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

 

[Old Rocks]

Dixiecrats. Now they are GOP.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Dixiecrats. Now they are GOP.

Same challenge AGAIN, Old Rocks, since it's obvious you ignored it the first time...

Prove it!! There were plenty of Dixiecrats that voted against the Civil Rights Act, you shouldn't have ANY trouble naming the dozens of them that joined the Republican Party.

Tell you what, 'dozens' is a pretty tall order, so name half a dozen.

You know, half a dozen might be too much to ask, I'll settle for 3.

Three names, or admit you're full of shit!

Give it a shot, you fucking fraud!

 

[Salt Jones]

Dixiecrats. Now they are GOP.

Same challenge AGAIN, Old Rocks, since it's obvious you ignored it the first time...

Prove it!! There were plenty of Dixiecrats that voted against the Civil Rights Act, you shouldn't have ANY trouble naming the dozens of them that joined the Republican Party.

Tell you what, 'dozens' is a pretty tall order, so name half a dozen.

You know, half a dozen might be too much to ask, I'll settle for 3.

Three names, or admit you're full of shit!

Give it a shot, you fucking fraud!

Jesse Helms, Strom Thurman and Mills E. Godwin Jr.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Dixiecrats. Now they are GOP.

Same challenge AGAIN, Old Rocks, since it's obvious you ignored it the first time...

Prove it!! There were plenty of Dixiecrats that voted against the Civil Rights Act, you shouldn't have ANY trouble naming the dozens of them that joined the Republican Party.

Tell you what, 'dozens' is a pretty tall order, so name half a dozen.

You know, half a dozen might be too much to ask, I'll settle for 3.

Three names, or admit you're full of shit!

Give it a shot, you fucking fraud!

Jesse Helms, Strom Thurman and Mills E. Godwin Jr.

 

[GuyPinestra]

Dixiecrats. Now they are GOP.

Same challenge AGAIN, Old Rocks, since it's obvious you ignored it the first time...

Prove it!! There were plenty of Dixiecrats that voted against the Civil Rights Act, you shouldn't have ANY trouble naming the dozens of them that joined the Republican Party.

Tell you what, 'dozens' is a pretty tall order, so name half a dozen.

You know, half a dozen might be too much to ask, I'll settle for 3.

Three names, or admit you're full of shit!

Give it a shot, you fucking fraud!

Jesse Helms, Strom Thurman and Mills E. Godwin Jr.

Jesse Helms didn't run for the senate until 1972, therefore he never voted on the Civil rights Act, and couldn't have changed his party affiliation because of it.

Strom Thurmond is correct.

Mills E. Godwin Jr. was a Governor, and as such never voted on the Civil Rights Act. He also didn't change parties until 1972, after being denied a seat at the Virginia Democrat State Convention.

You got one right, can you get 2 more??

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nice try at dissimulation or you can't read.

GOP politicians in the South voted in higher %s against the legislation than did Dem politicians in the South.

Your figures below prove the issue was not party but geography. That is how it is taught in high school and college, and your model is taught as false logic. Call you local high school instructors.

And it was Democrats who passed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, despite the fierce opposition from its southern wing. Even the GOP in the South voted at higer %s against the acts than their Dem counterparts in the South.

Forget that?

Forgot it? I never knew it.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964

The Senate version:[16]
Totals are;
Yea/Nay

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

 

[Uncensored2008]

Must a lurn'd it from da KKK and dere bros.

What did you learn from the KKK, Truthmatters?

 

[Uncensored2008]

So today's KKK is made up of Democrats?

Today's KKK is made up of FBI agents. There effectively is no KKK.

Real racists organizations are the Aryan Brotherhood, Nation of Islam, The Southern Poverty Law Center, and the NBPP.

The KKK is a fairytale from years long gone.

 

[MisterBeale]

Well we won't have to worry about it. Obama won't lose...Now if he had a real conservative running against him he would lose

Bullshit. You mean if the system weren't rigged he might lose. It's a corporatecracy for god's sake. They are both supporting government fiddling with the economy for the advantages of private interests, be they the labor unions, big business, or the one they can both get behind, the big banks and high houses of finance. Neither one of them give a shit about the sovereign individual, or the rights of the little guy.

Obama is a fucking self-righteous social engineering elite. He believes that the job of the government is finding the right place in society for everyone, and taking care of them, cradle to grave. That isn't up to you though.

Romney is just fucking self-righteous. He believes the ignorant masses have no business being at the decision making table in the first place.

Both of them break bread together behind closed doors.

The Council on Foreign Relations Building, New York City

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If Obama loses there will be rioting. The Takers, Obamaroids and Fluffers will turn violent and ugly, well they're already ugly. OWS will be back with a vengeance.

If Obama wins there will be rioting. The Takers, Obamaroids and Fluffers will soon discover that 25% unemployment is not a good thing and their benefits will be cut. OWS will be back with a vengeance.