A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
Not enough anecdotal evidence to point a finger (yet?). This is a chatroom where partisans point fingers and loosely speculate with nothing more the the hope somebody will actually come up with something later to support all the time. Not the same.A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
No speculation specific to the anarchists, as it is not uncommon for wildfires on the west (left) coast to be human related, including nut-ball arsonists.Thousands of individual fires in a state that is under assault by anarchists but no speculation of arson? Somethin ain't right.
The news from the past several weeks was that one fire was started by humans and the others by the electrical storms they were having. I have no idea why you are confused it is not that indepth of an occurrence....A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
No the MSM slugs are not mentioning it because they first need to figure out HOW they can blame the deliberate Arson on White Supremacists working in conjunction of course with the Russians from The Kremlin
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
No the MSM slugs are not mentioning it because they first need to figure out HOW they can blame the deliberate Arson on White Supremacists working in conjunction of course with the Russians from The Kremlin
A weather channel babe spilled the beans when she said "not all the fires were caused by humans" but no speculation in the media or by officials. Is the media afraid to anger the anarchists or the public?
Maybe she was thinking of lightning, or spontaneous combustion?
No speculation specific to the anarchists, as it is not uncommon for wildfires on the west (left) coast to be human related, including nut-ball arsonists.Thousands of individual fires in a state that is under assault by anarchists but no speculation of arson? Somethin ain't right.
Clueless Kate Brown, and in all likelihood Gav Newsom, also are blaming global warming without one scintilla of evidence to back up that opinion.Several of the fires in Washington were set by arson, I’m not sure if any of it was political, the governor blamed climate change. So maybe arson and climate change are the same?