Wikileaks reveals WMDs

[JakeStarkey]

WPR? The online presence that is "balanced and thoughtful" like FoxNews is "fair and balanced"

You just proved my point.

 

[DiveCon]

That, Dive, is what makes it so incredible that they pulled it off.

ah, the lack of evidence is the proof

NOW i see it

LOL

 

[JakeStarkey]

Dweebcon, you have to prove that they are there when the invasion went off. That's the proof you lack. If they were, you know your master Bush would have told you in great detail.

 

[NYcarbineer]

From the OP:

An initial glance at the WikiLeaks war logs doesn’t reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq....

I love it when posters refute themselves in the first post of their thread.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bush eventually admitted there were no WMD's. When he retracts that, this fairy tale might rise to the level of debatable.

 

[DiveCon]

Dweebcon, you have to prove that they are there when the invasion went off. That's the proof you lack. If they were, you know your master Bush would have told you in great detail.

what the **** are you rambling about now?
my posat had NOTHING to do with WMD, it was refering to the connections of bin laden to the CIA you ******* idiot

 

[JakeStarkey]

Dweebcon, to prove the WMDs were there, you have to find them. No one has. The government would be announcing from the roof tops of all America. Never happened. Thus . . . .

 

[DiveCon]

Dweebcon, to prove the WMDs were there, you have to find them. No one has. The government would be announcing from the roof tops of all America. Never happened. Thus . . . .

dipshiot, **** off
i wasnt talking about WMD you ******* MORON

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, you were. Let's see you get yourself out of this one. It is fun to watch you wriggle like a fish on a hook.

 

[Paulie]

Wait...

So do we like wikileaks again now?

Did they tooootally redeem themselves?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Paulie, for most Americans I think, wikileaks is like judicial activism. If they guys agree with you, they are good; if not, they are bad.

 

[DiveCon]

Yeah, you were. Let's see you get yourself out of this one. It is fun to watch you wriggle like a fish on a hook.

you are a moron
**** off

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are projecting again, divedweeb.

 

[DiveCon]

You are projecting again, divedweeb.

dipshit, this is what happens when people dont QUOTE who they are responding to
morons like YOU lose track of the conversation

 

[JakeStarkey]

Describing yourself, divedweeb.

 

[DiveCon]

the post i made

no, it isnt
short of nutter conspiracy sites

dive, you are the nutter conspiracy case on this, and if you push it, you will lose badly. Just sneak away.

wrong again, jokey
there is no credible evidence that Bin Laden had any connections with the CIA

my reply to JB about that post

That, Dive, is what makes it so incredible that they pulled it off.

ah, the lack of evidence is the proof

NOW i see it

LOL

then you come in stating this

Dweebcon, you have to prove that they are there when the invasion went off. That's the proof you lack. If they were, you know your master Bush would have told you in great detail.

Dweebcon, you have to prove that they are there when the invasion went off. That's the proof you lack. If they were, you know your master Bush would have told you in great detail.

what the **** are you rambling about now?
my posat had NOTHING to do with WMD, it was refering to the connections of bin laden to the CIA you ******* idiot

game set match, jokey is a ******* retarded moron

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, divedweeb, you lost the entire game. The WMDs were not there when the invasion went off. That is what your side of neo-cons have to prove and you can't. End of discussion.

Now, really, stay on track.

 

[DiveCon]

Nope, divedweeb, you lost the entire game. The WMDs were not there when the invasion went off. That is what your side of neo-cons have to prove and you can't. End of discussion.

Now, really, stay on track.

again, moron, the conversation i was in had NOTHING TO DO WITH WMD

 

[JakeStarkey]

Says you now. . . hmmm, divedweeb?

 

[DiveCon]

Says you now. . . hmmm, divedweeb?

then you wonder why everyone dismisses your input