Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children

[CurveLight]

Now do the painfully predictable and ignore the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians.

Guess what dipshit? Those unarmed civilians were in the company of armed insurgents in an area that was being cleared by infantry troops who had been receiving small arms fire and was supported by 2 attack helicopters. Too bad for them that they wanted to run with the bad boys that day. It's called war and if you are going to be that stupid then pay the consequences. Can you understand S H I T - H A P P E N S ?

You can paint it and twist it and spin it any way you want but the group was armed with offensive weapons.

So CL now acknowledges that the insurgents had RPGs (instant engagement criteria) and the new complaint is that civilians got hurt too?

Wow, we've really made strides here.

As for the problem, I've got a solution that I mentioned earlier: CL can re-enlist and go back to spraying his magic pixie dust on CAS rounds so that the bullets magically find their target and innocents are spared.

Don't put words in my mouth you lying useless *****.

 

[CurveLight]

STFU *****, the 15-6 clearly shows that there were offensive weapons being carried by the group which was fired upon. Including AK47 and RPG. Tough ******* shit that you want Americans to be the bad guys. The pilots performed their jobs and attacked a valid target. Like it or not!

God Bless America

Now do the painfully predictable and ignore the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians.

Guess what dipshit? Those unarmed civilians were in the company of armed insurgents in an area that was being cleared by infantry troops who had been receiving small arms fire and was supported by 2 attack helicopters. Too bad for them that they wanted to run with the bad boys that day. It's called war and if you are going to be that stupid then pay the consequences. Can you understand S H I T - H A P P E N S ?

You can paint it and twist it and spin it any way you want but the group was armed with offensive weapons.

There isn't a single weapon visible in the video. The only shooting happening is the pilots killing unarmed civilians.

 

[geauxtohell]

Guess what dipshit? Those unarmed civilians were in the company of armed insurgents in an area that was being cleared by infantry troops who had been receiving small arms fire and was supported by 2 attack helicopters. Too bad for them that they wanted to run with the bad boys that day. It's called war and if you are going to be that stupid then pay the consequences. Can you understand S H I T - H A P P E N S ?

You can paint it and twist it and spin it any way you want but the group was armed with offensive weapons.

So CL now acknowledges that the insurgents had RPGs (instant engagement criteria) and the new complaint is that civilians got hurt too?

Wow, we've really made strides here.

As for the problem, I've got a solution that I mentioned earlier: CL can re-enlist and go back to spraying his magic pixie dust on CAS rounds so that the bullets magically find their target and innocents are spared.

Don't put words in my mouth you lying useless *****.

Or what? You are going to whine some more?

You've exceeded my threshold for caring about your whiney snits on this thread.

Furthermore, when I ask you direct questions to clarify times when you whine about me "putting words in your mouth" you refuse to answer them.

So, what words have I put in your mouth and what is right or wrong about them?

Or more directly: do you concur with the Army's findings that there were RPGs on the site?

I won't expect an answer from you. You are the lady that doth protest too much. You run around and accuse everyone else of being dishonest and lying, and yet you are the most dishonest broker on this thread.

 

[geauxtohell]

There isn't a single weapon visible in the video. The only shooting happening is the pilots killing unarmed civilians.

There certainly is. You can clearly see a guy holding an AK without a stock by the handle early on.

But the investigation jacknuts, what do you say to the investigation where the Infantry found the weapons after they cleared the site?

 

[Liability]

Everything you do or say is based on a lie or distortion of facts. So by your own logic...you must be a LYING ASS *****!!!!!

Your response will help show that to be true....

Finally....glad to see you are no longer in denial. That's the first step to getting the help you need.

10 to 1 the lying pussypuddle still hasn't figured out why his reply was mock worthy!

 

[RadiomanATL]

What is a "snitch *****" as opposed to a "pure *****"? Is a snitch ***** impure and therefore incapable of becoming a pure *****?

Liability is a Snitch ***** because he tries to bait people to break the rules then runs to staff for help....much like radioasswipe.

You're pure ***** because everything you do and say is determined by fear. Your response will help show that to be true.....

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

 

[CurveLight]

What is a "snitch *****" as opposed to a "pure *****"? Is a snitch ***** impure and therefore incapable of becoming a pure *****?

Liability is a Snitch ***** because he tries to bait people to break the rules then runs to staff for help....much like radioasswipe.

You're pure ***** because everything you do and say is determined by fear. Your response will help show that to be true.....

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

You don't have to use the report button *****. Did you ever figure out your missing footage or are you still hoping you can use that to hide behind the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians?

 

[CurveLight]

There isn't a single weapon visible in the video. The only shooting happening is the pilots killing unarmed civilians.

There certainly is. You can clearly see a guy holding an AK without a stock by the handle early on.

But the investigation jacknuts, what do you say to the investigation where the Infantry found the weapons after they cleared the site?

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!! Could you also tell what kind of gum he was chewing? Why not also say his shoe size? If you're going to reach.....reach big!

I'm going by the live video that shows no weapons at all. I will believe a live video over an AAR any day of the week.

 

[CurveLight]

So CL now acknowledges that the insurgents had RPGs (instant engagement criteria) and the new complaint is that civilians got hurt too?

Wow, we've really made strides here.

As for the problem, I've got a solution that I mentioned earlier: CL can re-enlist and go back to spraying his magic pixie dust on CAS rounds so that the bullets magically find their target and innocents are spared.

Don't put words in my mouth you lying useless *****.

Or what? You are going to whine some more?

You've exceeded my threshold for caring about your whiney snits on this thread.

Furthermore, when I ask you direct questions to clarify times when you whine about me "putting words in your mouth" you refuse to answer them.

So, what words have I put in your mouth and what is right or wrong about them?

Or more directly: do you concur with the Army's findings that there were RPGs on the site?

I won't expect an answer from you. You are the lady that doth protest too much. You run around and accuse everyone else of being dishonest and lying, and yet you are the most dishonest broker on this thread.

Don't put words in my mouth and there won't be a reason to call you a *****. It's pretty simple.

The reports don't line up with the video so I don't give a **** what they say. You may choose to ignore the fact there are no weapons in the video and that is your right.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Liability is a Snitch ***** because he tries to bait people to break the rules then runs to staff for help....much like radioasswipe.

You're pure ***** because everything you do and say is determined by fear. Your response will help show that to be true.....

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

You don't have to use the report button *****. Did you ever figure out your missing footage or are you still hoping you can use that to hide behind the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians?

So backed into putting up proof or shutting the **** up, you decide to backpedal like a ************. Figures you lying sack of shit.

I proved that there was missing footage repeatedly. Putting your fingers in your ears and denying it does not constitute counter-proof. You lose. Again.

 

[geauxtohell]

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

You don't have to use the report button *****. Did you ever figure out your missing footage or are you still hoping you can use that to hide behind the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians?

So backed into putting up proof or shutting the **** up, you decide to backpedal like a ************. Figures you lying sack of shit.

I proved that there was missing footage repeatedly. Putting your fingers in your ears and denying it does not constitute counter-proof. You lose. Again.

There's a report button on this mother?

Wow, that feature must be disabled on my system. Not that I'd use it anyways........

 

[CurveLight]

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

You don't have to use the report button *****. Did you ever figure out your missing footage or are you still hoping you can use that to hide behind the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians?

So backed into putting up proof or shutting the **** up, you decide to backpedal like a ************. Figures you lying sack of shit.

I proved that there was missing footage repeatedly. Putting your fingers in your ears and denying it does not constitute counter-proof. You lose. Again.

Lol....I didn't backpedal on anything you whiny *****. As for your missing footag
e......you haven't proven much of anything because it doesn't change the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians. Were you really hoping your red herring was going to work? Lol......what else you got besides being a crybaby?

 

[geauxtohell]

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!!

At 53 seconds into this video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25EWUUBjPMo]YouTube - WikiLeaks raw US Apache footage[/ame]

The pilots ID'd it too, you know those guys whose job you think you can do a better job than?

In fact, you can see two people with AKs. If you can't see it, then you need to get your eyes checked.

That would tend to support what the guys on the ground found.

Could you also tell what kind of gum he was chewing? Why not also say his shoe size? If you're going to reach.....reach big!

Hey, jackass, you can't have it both ways. You can't claim "I am only going to go with what's on the video!" and then mock people for pointing out what is on the video to you.

I'm going by the live video that shows no weapons at all. I will believe a live video over an AAR any day of the week.

Only it does. I can't ID an RPG in the video clearly, but you can clearly see Ak-47s.

Of course, it only makes sense that you'd dismiss the Army report as a conspiracy.

 

[geauxtohell]

Don't put words in my mouth and there won't be a reason to call you a *****. It's pretty simple.

Oh, okay. "Don't put words in my mouth, or I'll call you a *****!"

Guess what? I could gives a shit about what you call me on here. Your ******* clown-ass is three steps away from joining the circus and going pro.

The reports don't line up with the video so I don't give a **** what they say. You may choose to ignore the fact there are no weapons in the video and that is your right.

Here, allow me to put some more words in your mouth:

"I know what I believe and don't care what the facts say!"

 

[CurveLight]

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!!

At 53 seconds into this video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25EWUUBjPMo]YouTube - WikiLeaks raw US Apache footage[/ame]

The pilots ID'd it too, you know those guys whose job you think you can do a better job than?

In fact, you can see two people with AKs. If you can't see it, then you need to get your eyes checked.

That would tend to support what the guys on the ground found.

Could you also tell what kind of gum he was chewing? Why not also say his shoe size? If you're going to reach.....reach big!

Hey, jackass, you can't have it both ways. You can't claim "I am only going to go with what's on the video!" and then mock people for pointing out what is on the video to you.

I'm going by the live video that shows no weapons at all. I will believe a live video over an AAR any day of the week.

Only it does. I can't ID an RPG in the video clearly, but you can clearly see Ak-47s.

Of course, it only makes sense that you'd dismiss the Army report as a conspiracy.

You think that is an ak minus the stock? Rotfl! Do the measurements you dumfuk.

The pilots could positively id an ak but not an rpg? What a fuxxing joke. Keep spinning you whiny ****.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

There isn't a single weapon visible in the video. The only shooting happening is the pilots killing unarmed civilians.

There certainly is. You can clearly see a guy holding an AK without a stock by the handle early on.

But the investigation jacknuts, what do you say to the investigation where the Infantry found the weapons after they cleared the site?

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!!

Yeah...who ever heard of one of those!!!! Duhhhhhh

 

[PatekPhilippe]

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!!

At 53 seconds into this video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25EWUUBjPMo]YouTube - WikiLeaks raw US Apache footage[/ame]

The pilots ID'd it too, you know those guys whose job you think you can do a better job than?

In fact, you can see two people with AKs. If you can't see it, then you need to get your eyes checked.

That would tend to support what the guys on the ground found.

Could you also tell what kind of gum he was chewing? Why not also say his shoe size? If you're going to reach.....reach big!

Hey, jackass, you can't have it both ways. You can't claim "I am only going to go with what's on the video!" and then mock people for pointing out what is on the video to you.

I'm going by the live video that shows no weapons at all. I will believe a live video over an AAR any day of the week.

Only it does. I can't ID an RPG in the video clearly, but you can clearly see Ak-47s.

Of course, it only makes sense that you'd dismiss the Army report as a conspiracy.

53 seconds in...irrefutable proof there is an AK 47 folder...no doubt.

 

[CurveLight]

You can clearly see a guy holding an ak w/o the stock? Rotfl!!!!

At 53 seconds into this video.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25EWUUBjPMo]YouTube - WikiLeaks raw US Apache footage[/ame]

The pilots ID'd it too, you know those guys whose job you think you can do a better job than?

In fact, you can see two people with AKs. If you can't see it, then you need to get your eyes checked.

That would tend to support what the guys on the ground found.



Hey, jackass, you can't have it both ways. You can't claim "I am only going to go with what's on the video!" and then mock people for pointing out what is on the video to you.

I'm going by the live video that shows no weapons at all. I will believe a live video over an AAR any day of the week.

Only it does. I can't ID an RPG in the video clearly, but you can clearly see Ak-47s.

Of course, it only makes sense that you'd dismiss the Army report as a conspiracy.

53 seconds in...irrefutable proof there is an AK 47 folder...no doubt.

Oh well if you say so.........lol.

Radioasswipe and crimsoncunt has been whining endlessly about the video being edited. After they post some evidence of missing footage they fail to address the fact the break in the video doesn't happen until long after the civilians had already been shot and killed.

So tell us you fuxxing **** whiners....what does missing footage have to do with the civilians being shot since the video doesn't break until after 15 minutes of Bravo company walking around their dead bodies?

 

[geauxtohell]

You think that is an ak minus the stock? Rotfl! Do the measurements you dumfuk.

Yeah. Kind of like the one I am holding in the following picture from Afghanistan you frigging pogue.

The pilots could positively id an ak but not an rpg? What a fuxxing joke. Keep spinning you whiny ****.

That's not what I said.

 

[geauxtohell]

I never ever have reported a member to staff, nor have I ever reported a post. I want you to prove otherwise. All staff reading the thread is welcome to chime in.

You are a lying ****.

You don't have to use the report button *****. Did you ever figure out your missing footage or are you still hoping you can use that to hide behind the fact the pilots killed unarmed civilians?

So backed into putting up proof or shutting the **** up, you decide to backpedal like a ************. Figures you lying sack of shit.

I proved that there was missing footage repeatedly. Putting your fingers in your ears and denying it does not constitute counter-proof. You lose. Again.

My God, by Bentdick's standards, he a dishonest little ******* ***** who is lying out of his damned mouth.

Of course, bentdick doesn't do nuance very well.

Well, he doesn't do nuance when he's responding to another poster.