Why would God have a problem with abortion, when God commands the killing of babies in the Bible?

NO real Christian would say the old testament is irrelevant…EVER.
God isn’t the beta male pajama pant wearing barista boy that lefties want to believe he is…He is no push-over, he is a vengeful God.
IMG_1392.webp
 
1 Samuel 15:2-3

Thus says the LORD of hosts: ā€˜I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt. Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.ā€™ā€


This isn't an argument for or against abortion. It's merely pointing out that, in the Old Testament, God orders soldiers to kill babies during warfare.

And. while Christians may argue that the Old Testament isn't relevant today, one could also argue that, if God isn't against killing actual, born babies, that God wouldn't have been against abortion.

The way I would view it is that more humanistic values, such as those which value the lives of unborn children tended to become more widespread over time, and in ancient cultures, where threats to survival were a much more common part of life, humanistic values tended to be more respected.
Jeremiah 1:5.
 
NO real Christian would say the old testament is irrelevant…EVER.
It is. But you're not a Christian, so I figured you wouldn't understand this


Exodus 31:15 states, ā€œFor six days work may be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of complete rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must surely be put to death.ā€

We don't put people to death for working on the Sabbath, just as we don't follow Jewish dietary laws. Those are just a few examples:

God isn’t the beta male pajama pant wearing barista boy that lefties want to believe he is…He is no push-over, he is a vengeful God.
I don't know about beta male pajama pant wearing barista boys like yourself, but as far as Christ is concerned:

38 ā€œYou have heard that it was said, ā€˜Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.


Christ specifically said to turn the other cheek. Not to seek revenge. So again, you're not a Christian. You're rather echoing the sentiments of atheists like Nietzsche, and whatever "god" you worship isn't that of Christ.
 
A better question might be….If even the animal kingdom can value the sanctity of life why can’t purple hair nose-ringers?
Valuing the "sanctity of life" is forbeta male pajama pant wearing barista boys.

Real men like Ghenghis Kahn understand the vengeful joy of dashing the little ones' heads against stones.

2 Thessalonians 3:10[/URL] states: "For even when we were with you, we gave you this command: Anyone unwilling to work should not eat." This verse emphasizes the importance of work and self-sufficiency, discouraging idleness and dependence on others. It was likely a response to some in the Thessalonian church who had stopped working, believing that Christ's second coming was imminent

He said work or die of starvation.
It wasn't "he" who said that. It was Paul.

And he didn't say "work or die of starvation". He said that one who was "unwilling to work" should not eat. Jesus' concern for the poor and those who were unable to work is overarching.

It's interesting how you take the Bible of out context, but, then again, you're not a Christian, so that's not at all surprising.
 
1 Samuel 15:2-3

Thus says the LORD of hosts: ā€˜I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt. Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.ā€™ā€


This isn't an argument for or against abortion. It's merely pointing out that, in the Old Testament, God orders soldiers to kill babies during warfare.

And. while Christians may argue that the Old Testament isn't relevant today, one could also argue that, if God isn't against killing actual, born babies, that God wouldn't have been against abortion.

The way I would view it is that more humanistic values, such as those which value the lives of unborn children tended to become more widespread over time, and in ancient cultures, where threats to survival were a much more common part of life, humanistic values tended to be more respected.
It’s funny how you take such stories as literal when it suits your agenda.

Your OP in so many threads appear to be designed to cause people to react emotionally.

You’re a trash posting troll.
 
15th post
1 Samuel 15:2-3

Thus says the LORD of hosts: ā€˜I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt. Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.ā€™ā€


This isn't an argument for or against abortion. It's merely pointing out that, in the Old Testament, God orders soldiers to kill babies during warfare.

And. while Christians may argue that the Old Testament isn't relevant today, one could also argue that, if God isn't against killing actual, born babies, that God wouldn't have been against abortion.

The way I would view it is that more humanistic values, such as those which value the lives of unborn children tended to become more widespread over time, and in ancient cultures, where threats to survival were a much more common part of life, humanistic values tended to be more respected.
 
Back
Top Bottom