Why would broadcasters of any kind need a bailout?

Agit8r

Gold Member
Dec 4, 2010
12,141
2,209
245
The way these loans were doled out to favorite corporations, while actual people are getting evicted and starving, needs to be investigated. If it falls short of the legal definition of fraud, it certainly fulfils the broad defintion of the term. The obvious violation of the establishment clause, notwithstanding
Untitled drawing - 2021-01-27T113142.662.png


 
The way these loans were doled out to favorite corporations, while actual people are getting evicted and starving, needs to be investigated. If it falls short of the legal definition of fraud, it certainly fulfils the broad defintion of the term. The obvious violation of the establishment clause, notwithstanding View attachment 449316

Bailouts are unconstitutional to begin with. Saying a part of an unconstitutional act is unconstitutional, is redundant.
The banks were given leeway on how to disperse the loans. There is nothing to investigate.
But im with you, i dont like it either. The way all these rich fucks and politicians got bailed out, while mom and pops suffered, is bullshit.
Its almost like they create bullshit to benefit the rich on purpose, huh? Because thats what it always does.
 
The way these loans were doled out to favorite corporations, while actual people are getting evicted and starving, needs to be investigated. If it falls short of the legal definition of fraud, it certainly fulfils the broad defintion of the term. The obvious violation of the establishment clause, notwithstanding View attachment 449316

Bailouts are unconstitutional to begin with. Saying a part of an unconstitutional act is unconstitutional, is redundant.
The banks were given leeway on how to disperse the loans. There is nothing to investigate.
But im with you, i dont like it either. The way all these rich fucks and politicians got bailed out, while mom and pops suffered, is bullshit.
Its almost like they create bullshit to benefit the rich on purpose, huh? Because thats what it always does.

I agree. Both parties bear some degree of responsibility for this nonsense.
 
The way these loans were doled out to favorite corporations, while actual people are getting evicted and starving, needs to be investigated. If it falls short of the legal definition of fraud, it certainly fulfils the broad defintion of the term. The obvious violation of the establishment clause, notwithstanding View attachment 449316

Bailouts are unconstitutional to begin with. Saying a part of an unconstitutional act is unconstitutional, is redundant.
The banks were given leeway on how to disperse the loans. There is nothing to investigate.
But im with you, i dont like it either. The way all these rich fucks and politicians got bailed out, while mom and pops suffered, is bullshit.
Its almost like they create bullshit to benefit the rich on purpose, huh? Because thats what it always does.

I agree. Both parties bear some degree of responsibility for this nonsense.
All of it. They wrote and signed the bullshit.
 
Did you know that if you buy broadcasting station(s) and need to upgrade them the govt. will pay for it? And you thought this was a capitalist nation.
 
You don't think God will cough up the dough, does ya?
 
The way these loans were doled out to favorite corporations, while actual people are getting evicted and starving, needs to be investigated. If it falls short of the legal definition of fraud, it certainly fulfils the broad defintion of the term. The obvious violation of the establishment clause, notwithstanding


Your government "working for you"
 
Did you know that if you buy broadcasting station(s) and need to upgrade them the govt. will pay for it? And you thought this was a capitalist nation.

That's not true.
There are cases where, IF you make the application and IF you meet the standards, the CPB or NTIA will MATCH or SUPPLEMENT money you're already putting out for a public station, as a public service, but they don't fund it outright. And if you're a commercial broadcaster you're just on your own.

Sadly, that means the godcasters cited in the OP would qualify, as they're noncommercial.
 
Last edited:
Im more worried about people that wrote the law getting more money than we will ever see in our lifetime.
 
Did you know that if you buy broadcasting station(s) and need to upgrade them the govt. will pay for it? And you thought this was a capitalist nation.

Far from what we are told, Capitalism has always relied ondirect "bounties" (subsidies in Hamiltonian), land grants (how railroads got built), and bailouts (like the on in 1792), to continue functioning. government non-intervention in the marketplace is a purely theoretical concept.
 

Forum List

Back
Top