Why Would Anyone Vote For Hillary?

[Unkotare]

Umm, how about to break the glass ceiling she left millions of cracks in last time??

So, elect someone to a job as important as President of the United States just to have the 'first' something in the White House? Have you learned nothing?

Apparently you haven't learned that you are on the wrong side of history...e.

Voting for someone based on a superficiality rather than real experience and qualification is the 'right' side of history? Do you really want to be on record as taking that shallow and stupid a position? If so, you're just another weak-minded fool who has let partisanship make a clown of you.

Clinton: A name and a vagina are all you need.

True, but what about Hilary?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Umm, how about to break the glass ceiling she left millions of cracks in last time??

So, elect someone to a job as important as President of the United States just to have the 'first' something in the White House? Have you learned nothing?

Apparently you haven't learned that you are on the wrong side of history, and that a country run by conservative white men is a thing of the past.

Grow up, stop being scared, and shed the intolerance that's stops you from accepting this better and brighter future.

Apparently you haven't learned that you are on the wrong side of history,

Wrong side of history?
Is that anyone who resists your glorious, socialist future? LOL!

 

[Dot Com]

Why Would Anyone Vote For Hillary?

Seriously. Ev...

...

To piss off nitwits like you?

I don't much care for her but would vote for her to witness the ensuing rw hissy fit

 

[Cecilie1200]

Now she gets to fight back against the bs Bengazi, e-mail, and Clinton foundation horseshytte that accounts for the bs trust questions from the ignorant and duped.

Oh, so the problem before was that she just didn't get to fight back? Someone was preventing the poor dear from explaining herself and she required a Presidential campaign to be able to open her fat mouth and tell us what her ******* problem is?

Yeah, go with that. PLEASE go with that.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'm still trying to figure out why G is talking about Reagan? Shit.. the man's been dead for how long?

maybe you should mention that to all the GOP TV (Fox) newsreaders who must get paid per/mention of his name especially Bill Kristol He was the architect of vietraq for those "not in the know" or "purposely in the dark"

How much time do you spend watching Fox News to know this? For someone who's so disdainful of it, you appear to watch it and think about it far more than any Republican/conservative on the board.

I listen to the Sunday morning rebroadcasts of all the major network talkshows on cspan Sugar Shorts. Any other FAIL assumption you want to make?

OK that explains just a whole bunch right there.

How this changes the fact that he watches and thinks about Fox News more than any conservative here is a mystery to me. WHERE he's watching it is irrelevant.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why Would Anyone Vote For Hillary?

Seriously. Ev...

...

To piss off nitwits like you?

I don't much care for her but would vote for her to witness the ensuing rw hissy fit

Thank you for confirming that you are someone who should never be trusted with the vote, but in all honesty, it's superfluous, since we already knew that.

 

[Dot Com]

Why vote for HRC? Because there is no other viable candidate yet, ESPECIALLY in the GObP ranks

 

[Cecilie1200]

L

.....
Yes, thats exactly what I mean.

Let voters who care to vet her look that shit up.

You guys mind your own and go positive. See the wonders it can bring, jackasses.

Thank you admitting the logic behind liberal voting.

The lack of vetting put a REAL asshole in the White House last time. It should never happen again. We don't need another deceptive, power seeking "ruler" at the helm.

Liberalism is a terminal disease.

Lack of vetting?

The campaigns against Obama were 100% negative - all about wright, ayers and being a muslim....

**** outta here

Oh, WE vetted him, that's true. Unfortunately, the left not only didn't vet him, they actively avoided hearing anything substantial about him, shouting down any attempt to reach them with reality.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why vote for HRC? Because there is no other viable candidate yet, ESPECIALLY in the GObP ranks

Sweetie, I could run my puppy and have him be a more viable candidate than Hillary, because HE at least is cute.

 

[Redfish]

Why vote for HRC? Because there is no other viable candidate yet, ESPECIALLY in the GObP ranks

a head of cabbage would be a more viable candidate than HRC. Cabbage for POTUS !

 

[Cecilie1200]

"I voted for Hillary in 2016" will get a guy laid a lot more effectively than "I didn't vote for Hillary in 2016"

I guess that depends on who he's trying to get laid by. The sort of skanks impressed by Hillary are just as impressed by a bottle of mescal, or they're dykes and nothing's gonna help.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Most people that intend to vote for her will do so for one or more of the follies three reasons.

Name
Gender
Political affiliation

All of which are pretty shallow reasons to support her

 

[Cecilie1200]

Seriously. Even the libs on this board dont like her. She isnt leftist enough for the hard core leftists, she voted for the Iraq War as senator, her tenure at State was a disaster, and her ideas on the economy are a replay of the failed economic policies of Barack Hussein Obama.
So what does she offer, other than a name and a vagina?

Umm, how about to break the glass ceiling she left millions of cracks in last time?

Do you ever get tired of being on the WRONG side of history you bigot?

So her big qualification is, in fact, that she - allegedly - has a vagina?

Has it occurred to you that making meaningless political statements and gestures might not be the best reason for making someone President of the United States? That, in fact, we might want to choose them for - call me crazy - their ability to actually DO THE JOB?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Umm, how about to break the glass ceiling she left millions of cracks in last time??

So, elect someone to a job as important as President of the United States just to have the 'first' something in the White House? Have you learned nothing?

Apparently you haven't learned that you are on the wrong side of history...e.

Voting for someone based on a superficiality rather than real experience and qualification is the 'right' side of history? Do you really want to be on record as taking that shallow and stupid a position? If so, you're just another weak-minded fool who has let partisanship make a clown of you.

You are the only stupid one. Your attack on female empowerment as "superficial" is just a cover for your misogyny, just like being supposedly "colorblind" is a cover for right wing racism.

Are you a female? I am, and I resent being told that electing that creature simply because she presumably has similar reproductive organs to me is somehow going to "empower" me as though being female makes me ******* stupid enough to buy that drivel. Don't patronize us, fuckstain. The only person voting for Hillary Clinton empowers is Hillary Clinton.

 

[pwjohn]

Seriously. Even the libs on this board dont like her. She isnt leftist enough for the hard core leftists, she voted for the Iraq War as senator, her tenure at State was a disaster, and her ideas on the economy are a replay of the failed economic policies of Barack Hussein Obama.
So what does she offer, other than a name and a vagina?

Hillary's lack of a penis, plus her willingness to fight for the job is reason enough for me to vote for her come 2016.

 

[Edgetho]

 

[Cecilie1200]

So now that the leftists on this board have confirmed, virtually unanimously, that they would vote for Jack the Ripper so long as he had that all-important (D) after his name, let's discuss why this is actual a real question deserving a serious answer.

1) Hillary Clinton is running, and believes herself the best candidate, simply because she believes she is somehow entitled to be President. Any American who understands anything about why the US has a representative government instead of a monarchy should be disturbed by an assumption of a "divine right to rule".

2) Barack Obama has been an abysmal President, and Hillary Clinton is inextricably linked with that. This is not only because she was his Secretary of State and embraced his foreign policies and made them worse, but because she has supported his policies on numerous occasions out of her own mouth.

3) She's unlikable, divisive and polarizing. Hell, even the Democrat base doesn't like her or rate her as trustworthy. Admittedly, Democrats don't consider trustworthiness to be of any particular value, but still . . .

4) She's scandal-ridden. You leftists can airily wave your hands and dismiss it all you like, but every single time Hillary has been in the political spotlight, she's been plagued with credible, plausible questions about her actions.

5) She intends to wave her gender in our faces like a matador with a red cape for the next decade. It isn't just conservatives and Republicans who are sick to death of identity politics, not by a long shot. And unlike blacks, women don't vote in overwhelming lockstep. Many of us are actually bright enough to be concerned about real issues, such as the economy, foreign policy, crime . . . none of which Hillary has anything positive to offer on.

And honestly, do we really want to be reminded of Hillary's vag every time she's on TV for the next ten years?

6) If you have a problem with Washington insiders, this woman is an insider to make even insiders look like newbies.

(Thank you to David Limbaugh for the basic points I expounded on.)

So this being said, I have to ask again: why would you vote for Hillary? An honest assessment of her as a candidate makes "She's not a Republican" sound even sillier than it does on its face.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Seriously. Even the libs on this board dont like her. She isnt leftist enough for the hard core leftists, she voted for the Iraq War as senator, her tenure at State was a disaster, and her ideas on the economy are a replay of the failed economic policies of Barack Hussein Obama.
So what does she offer, other than a name and a vagina?

Hillary's lack of a penis, plus her willingness to fight for the job is reason enough for me to vote for her come 2016.

What's your problem with penises? Did one scare you at some point? (Note: if the answer involves your daddy touching you in bad ways, please decline to answer.)

Once upon a time, rampant desire for political office was automatically considered a disqualification for holding it, since no one sane and virtuous would do so. Just saying . . .

 

[LogikAndReazon]

She will get some votes only because she has a vagina.
No other reason.

 

[bodecea]

L

.....
Yes, thats exactly what I mean.

Let voters who care to vet her look that shit up.

You guys mind your own and go positive. See the wonders it can bring, jackasses.

Thank you admitting the logic behind liberal voting.

The lack of vetting put a REAL asshole in the White House last time. It should never happen again. We don't need another deceptive, power seeking "ruler" at the helm.

Liberalism is a terminal disease.

Lack of vetting?

The campaigns against Obama were 100% negative - all about wright, ayers and being a muslim....

**** outta here

Oh, WE vetted him, that's true. Unfortunately, the left not only didn't vet him, they actively avoided hearing anything substantial about him, shouting down any attempt to reach them with reality.

You know you are not telling the truth there at all...The first and most vigorous vetting of Obama was by Hillary Clinton's campaign staff. Now.........if you are not counting Clinton as "the left"?