Why Would Anybody Be Against The Ban For Gender Mutilation On Minors?

I do not think circumcision can be categorized as mutilation since it does not really damage the penis or hamper its function. It could perhaps be discussed whether it is medically necessary, but it is a separate issue.
Unlike female genital mutilation as practiced by cultures that left-wingers insist we should invite to our nation, and "gender affirmation" surgery, circumcision does not interfere in any way with the functions of the sex organs.

It first became popular among non-Jews in the United States when soldiers returning from WWII wanted it for their sons, having seen how much easier personal hygene in the field had been for Jewish American soldiers.

As with intersex children, which is very rare, and was already being dealt with as well as it could be before the transgenderization of children, circumcision, a well-researched safe procedure, is a red herring.

These red herrings are nearly always trotted out by people who want to feed their fantasies of a large supply of kids who look like pubescent versions of the models in the "Chicks with Dicks" porn to which they are helplessly addicted.
 
Last edited:

You don't view circumcision as the Mutilation On Minors?​

Dante, I don't know why I had you on ignore, but I took you off so you could fairly respond to what I said to Trickster above - if you choose to.
 
How the hell do you know what these parents want for their kids ? a lot of crazy libs feel like they're special if their kids are transgender you're full of crap this the state of Democrat party today pretty pathetic
What a ridiculous claim
No parent wishes their child to be transgender.
It is not an easy life.
 
Imagine if The Right was as passionate about protecting America as they are with transgenders. Only two groups care about this; the radical left and the mainstream right.

The GOP is dead and soon the country too.
 
Same reason Liberals don't want to ban and punish abortion. (And why Conservatives don't want to stop mass shootings and gun violence by govt passing laws to ban guns which isn't the source of the problem or the solution, but an external Bandaid.)

Govt should not be policing personal health care, mental health conflicts, and medical decisions that should already be barred as bad medical practice.

The problem is that sex abuse and relationship abuse that leads to unwanted pregnancy and abortions have to be addressed and solved by individuals on personal level outside govt jurisdiction .

Same with the gender dysphoria that is a spiritual process outside govt jurisdiction.

So none of these politicized battles should be govt's business to dictate how people should solve them.

What govt can do in the case of transition counseling, therapy and procedures is add requirements to the Medical board license and process which includes training in spiritual healing therapy shown to effectively address sex related abuse, addiction, and suicidal conditions. If counselors have no background, knowledge or training in healing gender dysphoria, unwanted homosexual conditions, or suicidal self harm from abuse, they should not be counseling or transitioning any clients.

Instead of banning conversion therapy (which isn't clearly defined to distinguish the fraudulent malpractice from the voluntary therapy that does work effectively based on the same forgiveness and deliverance counseling uses in recovery programs), the common solution would be to require specialized training in the area of spiritual healing of generational conditions related to sex abuse, addiction and disorders.



Well there you have it folks! People admitting on camera that they're not going to end the child abuse and refuse to comply with our president's orders. All of these people (with the exception of the children since they're the innocent victims) should be arrested!!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom