Why wasn't she asked about accepting the result?

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.


Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?


No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

Nice meltdown. Get a grip.

Why did Mike Pence contradict Trump about accepting the election results?


Why did Kaine get only 30 people to his last rally in Florida?

The difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans do not always agree on everything and are not all robots spouting the same talking points day in and day out. We think for ourselves and openly disagree. When we disagree we get together and discuss it and find common ground. Dems all bow to the talking point masters.

You lose arguments in the most amusing ways.
 
I want to point out: during the debate Hillary never answered the question about peaceful transfer of the power either. Liberal Media is all over Trump for being frank about "peaceful transfer of the power". Why everyone is silent about Clinton's response, just because there was no response at all? I hope undecided Americans have eyes and ears to realize that.

May be she knows that they have enough dummies+traitors+illegals+dead people to decide the future of the country and not to worry about the elections to be fair.

Yeah you tell um,,,,,,um well no.

"We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them, and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election."

Read more: Full transcript: Third 2016 presidential debate
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU


The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

The recount was mandatory under Fla. law.
 
What the **** is this thread about?

Trump now admits to being a dumbass at the debates and concedes that he will conceeed. (Not like he'll have any choice given that he still wants to salvage what is left of his brand)
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?
She wasn't asked because she has never said the election was rigged and that she would not accept a loss.

Any more stupid questions?
Nope, just stupid answers.
 
Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?


No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

Nice meltdown. Get a grip.

Why did Mike Pence contradict Trump about accepting the election results?


Why did Kaine get only 30 people to his last rally in Florida?

The difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans do not always agree on everything and are not all robots spouting the same talking points day in and day out. We think for ourselves and openly disagree. When we disagree we get together and discuss it and find common ground. Dems all bow to the talking point masters.

You lose arguments in the most amusing ways.


When I lose one I will let you know. You lose every one you enter. A record of failure, just like you candidate, the hildebeast.
 
that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU


The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

The recount was mandatory under Fla. law.


Yes, but Gore and the dems only wanted a recount in a few counties. That's why they lost the case in the SC.
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?

This is perhaps the first election where everyone seems to know the outcome, so asking the question seems absurd.
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?

This is perhaps the first election where everyone seems to know the outcome, so asking the question seems absurd.


yep, and when Trump wins the dems and their media suck buddies will be screaming that he cheated. We all know that. There will also be riots in big city ghettos where people will burn and loot their neighbors stores and homes.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom