Why wasn't she asked about accepting the result?

Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?
He did accept it.


check your history. Gore filed several lawsuits and it took a SC ruling to shut him up
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?
Gore conceded. Will Donald?


Gore conceded after filing several lawsuits and delaying the process for several weeks, It took a supreme court ruling to shut him up, even to this day he is still crying that mean ole W beat him unfairly. Gore was and is a classless asshole.

It Trump loses and there is no evidence of voter fraud, he will accept the will of the people.

Now, once again, if Hillary loses, will she?
W actually filed the lawsuit. But, if the election is close enough that the result might change if a state's votes were recounted, and if there's a reason to believe the votes were inaccurately counted, Trump should avail himself of laws that allow for a recount.

But, if (and most likely) Hillary is certified by enough states to be the winner, will Trump concede? And if so, will he still snark and pout and lead his faithful to never accepting the results as being the will of the people and deserving support? I doubt it.


If the hildebeast wins and there is no evidence of voter fraud, I am sure Trump will accept the result.

For the record, the Gore people did not want to recount ALL of the Florida votes, only the ones in selected counties that they thought they could rig.
 
Hillary wasn't asked, because she not running around the country crying about the American voting system being rigged and trying to undermine the results before the votes have even been cast. Trump is a whiny *****, and the OP greedily gobbles up any piss that comes out of Trump's mouth
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?
He did accept it.


check your history. Gore filed several lawsuits and it took a SC ruling to shut him up
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?
He did accept it.


check your history. Gore filed several lawsuits and it took a SC ruling to shut him up
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
 
He did accept it.


check your history. Gore filed several lawsuits and it took a SC ruling to shut him up
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.
 
check your history. Gore filed several lawsuits and it took a SC ruling to shut him up
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.
 
Did you watch the first debate? Both were asked at the end. Trump *****-footed around the question before finally answering. Since then he's come up with a basket full of excuses why he's going to lose so he was asked about it again at the last debate.
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?

She was asked the same question, and she replied that she would absolutely accept the will of the people, because unlike Donald, she knows the voting system can't be gamed.
 
Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.


maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.
You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.
 
Why wasn't she asked about accepting the result?


Are you really this dumb? I mean really,dude.

Trump is the one screaming that it's rigged, dope.
 
Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?

You are brilliant.

He was only asked because he was saying that he might not.
 
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.
That is not how it happened, and I have the BBC behind me.
 
Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.


maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.
You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.
Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.
 
Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.
That is not how it happened, and I have the BBC behind me.


well, holy shit, the BBC. I lived through that crap, I know exactly what happened and so do the majority of americans.
 
Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.


maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.
You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.
Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.


Putting lying porn stars on prime time is not coverage, its propaganda. Oversampling democrats in the so-called polls is not reporting, its a failing attempt to discourage Trump voters-------------but its not working. He is getting huge crowds and the hildebeast is lucky to get 200 to show up to listen to her lies and bullshit.
 
15th post
In a close election that could have actually gone both ways literally.He accepted the SC decision, although many people did not want him to. He actually probably won the election.


Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU
 
Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.


maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.
You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.
Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.


Putting lying porn stars on prime time is not coverage, its propaganda. Oversampling democrats in the so-called polls is not reporting, its a failing attempt to discourage Trump voters-------------but its not working. He is getting huge crowds and the hildebeast is lucky to get 200 to show up to listen to her lies and bullshit.

What is the correct number of Democrats in a presidential poll?
 
Gore did not win. Bush got more EC votes. That's the way our system works.

BTW, what is the channel of appeal after the supreme court has ruled? Since you think he should have continued to claim victory, exactly how would that work?
Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.


that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?
You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.


Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU


The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?
 
Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.


maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.
You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.
Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.


Putting lying porn stars on prime time is not coverage, its propaganda. Oversampling democrats in the so-called polls is not reporting, its a failing attempt to discourage Trump voters-------------but its not working. He is getting huge crowds and the hildebeast is lucky to get 200 to show up to listen to her lies and bullshit.

What is the correct number of Democrats in a presidential poll?


The demographics of the poll should proportionally reflect the demographics of the state or nation. That's exactly why a poll of 1000 people out of 330,000,000 is statistically meaningless.

Do you understand what demographics means?

Some examples of demographics:
black republicans living in rural areas
native americans living on reservations
Chinese democrats over the age of 50
white males of college age
white males working manual labor
black females on welfare
black females with executive jobs

I could go on, but the point is that there are many more than 1000 demographics in the USA.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom