Why wasn't she asked about accepting the result?

[NYcarbineer]

Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.

that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?

You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

No the election was not decided in November. If it had been, no court would have heard any of the suits filed.

 

[jc456]

Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

but it is. just the OP of this thread shows it. she wasn't asked. she wasn't asked about why she ignored benghazi, she wasn't asked why 33k emails are missing. where's the six billion? and on and on. But yet, let's focus an entire week on false accusations from women who claim they were groped. yep that's what's fking important here. not four dead americans from Benghazi, not women who actually went to the courts against ole bill and cried rape, nope. msm is rigged, and dude you can argue your entire life here with me, and that point doesn't change. It's been like this since 1990. journalism is dead. it's now political wannabes giving opinion pieces 24 hours a day.

 

[NYcarbineer]

maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.

You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.

Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.

Putting lying porn stars on prime time is not coverage, its propaganda. Oversampling democrats in the so-called polls is not reporting, its a failing attempt to discourage Trump voters-------------but its not working. He is getting huge crowds and the hildebeast is lucky to get 200 to show up to listen to her lies and bullshit.

What is the correct number of Democrats in a presidential poll?

The demographics of the poll should proportionally reflect the demographics of the state or nation. That's exactly why a poll of 1000 people out of 330,000,000 is statistically meaningless.

Do you understand what demographics means?

Some examples of demographics:
black republicans living in rural areas
native americans living on reservations
Chinese democrats over the age of 50
white males of college age
white males working manual labor
black females on welfare
black females with executive jobs

I could go on, but the point is that there are many more than 1000 demographics in the USA.

We don't have 330,000,000 voters in this country.

 

[Mac1958]

Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

but it is. just the OP of this thread shows it. she wasn't asked. she wasn't asked about why she ignored benghazi, she wasn't asked why 33k emails are missing. where's the six billion? and on and on. But yet, let's focus an entire week on false accusations from women who claim they were groped. yep that's what's fking important here. not four dead americans from Benghazi, not women who actually went to the courts against ole bill and cried rape, nope. msm is rigged, and dude you can argue your entire life here with me, and that point doesn't change. It's been like this since 1990. journalism is dead. it's now political wannabes telling opinion pieces 24 hours a day.

I don't disagree with that. The media is clearly biased.

My point was specific to the question, though. Trump has given the media license, at least in its mind, to throw out all pretense of objectivity. He has made it easy for them. The GOP knew about the press long before this, yet it still nominated the biggest, easiest and loudest target on the planet.

There can be no surprise about what the media has done.
.

 

[jc456]

Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

but it is. just the OP of this thread shows it. she wasn't asked. she wasn't asked about why she ignored benghazi, she wasn't asked why 33k emails are missing. where's the six billion? and on and on. But yet, let's focus an entire week on false accusations from women who claim they were groped. yep that's what's fking important here. not four dead americans from Benghazi, not women who actually went to the courts against ole bill and cried rape, nope. msm is rigged, and dude you can argue your entire life here with me, and that point doesn't change. It's been like this since 1990. journalism is dead. it's now political wannabes telling opinion pieces 24 hours a day.

I don't disagree with that. The media is clearly biased.

My point was specific to the question, though. Trump has given the media license, at least in its mind, to throw out all pretense of objectivity. He has made it easy for them. The GOP knew about the press long before this, yet it still nominated the biggest, easiest and loudest target on the planet.

There can be no surprise about what the media has done.
.

dude, exactly, it's all been out there all through the primaries. Now the MSM are non stop. I give two rats asses about the MSM, I just grow tired of the lazy, sloppy reporting that clearly is an effort to persuade voters to stay home and don't vote for Donald. It is the entire meaning. They have the bully pulpit and are using it. There is no one there giving the other side of this. No one. That's fking rigged. And Americans are smart and Donald knows this. it's also fking illegal.

 

[easyt65]

'Why wasn't she asked about accepting the result?'

Because, like with the DNC Primary, she already knows and accepts the results - the fix is in.

 

[NoNukes]

Many people wanted him to continue the fight, but he accepted it for the good of the country.

that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?

You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

 

[Redfish]

that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?

You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

No the election was not decided in November. If it had been, no court would have heard any of the suits filed.

your ignorance is only exceeded by your arrogance. Bush won on election day, Gore refused to concede and demanded recounts in SOME florida counties---not all counties, only the ones the dems thought they could manipulate. The Florida AG said that if there was to be a recount it would be in all counties and the SC confirmed her ruling.

 

[Redfish]

that's funny. What you said is why Nixon resigned, not why Gore conceded. Democrats don't give a shit about the "good of the country" all they care about is power and how much money they can steal----------------------duh, have you watched the Clintons for the last 30 years?

You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You are really full of shit. I just read his quote on the BBC website the other day. You are just stupid and hateful. Why I even bother with you is beyond me.

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

 

[jc456]

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

it was a month and he cried and whined about for that month. The SC told him no and he conceded. Didn't stop the crying or whining. did it? It is still out there today. Dems still crying foul. the old hanging chad, it will never go away.

 

[Redfish]

Gore wanted to demand a recount of two selected counties in Fla where the dems thought they could control the vote count. The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office.

You my little friend, are the one who is stupid and hateful, and ignores the facts of history.

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The facts of history:

1. Bush v. Gore decided Dec.12, 2000

2. Gore concession speech Dec 13, 2000

now STFU

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?

 

[Redfish]

The election was in November, dipshit. Bush was declared the winner the day after election day. Gore and the dems dragged it out for a month and lost.

Do they teach any history in the schools in your state?

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?

No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just admit that you were wrong.

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?

No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

Nice meltdown. Get a grip.

Why did Mike Pence contradict Trump about accepting the election results?

 

[bodecea]

Just curious, but why wasn't that question posed to HRC? We all know that the prophet algore did not accept the vote in 2000. What would Hillary answer---------if anyone would ask her?

I am surprised she wasn't....maybe because Drumpf made such an ass of himself.....

 

[jc456]

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?

No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

Nice meltdown. Get a grip.

Why did Mike Pence contradict Trump about accepting the election results?

why does it matter?

 

[Redfish]

If I was wrong I would admit it. But I have stated what happened correctly. Its you on the left that are trying to rewrite history----------as you fools always try to do.

This what you said:

"The SC court told him NO. He whined and cried for months, and Bush took office."

Gore did NOT 'whine and cry' for months after the Supreme Court told him no. He conceded the NEXT DAY.

Please forgive me. I guess my writing skills exceed your comprehension skills. If you read my entire post you would understand that I said that Gore whined and cried for months UNTIL the SC ruled.

when addressing you in the future I will try to use small words and very simple sentence structure so that your small mind can grasp the discussion.

NO you didn't.

Besides, if you're going to characterize a legal action that ultimately ended in a single vote loss on the Supreme Court as 'whining and crying',

then every challenge the Supreme Court reviews is made by a whiner. That would include for example, challenges to the ACA, challenges to gun control laws...

...is that what you're trying to say?

No, its very simple. Gore and the dem machine did not accept the results of the vote until the SC ruled on it. If Trump suspects vote fraud or cheating, he may do the same thing.

This discussion is to point out the hypocrisy of you libs and the lying media when they wail and ***** about Trump saying that he would not automatically accept the election results.

Many politicians of both parties at federal, state, and local levels have questioned voting results many many times. Its nothing new.

But it gives you assholes an excuse to not talk about Hillary's criminal acts as SecState, the money laundering done by the Clinton foundation, and her failing health. We get it, and so do most American voters.

Nice meltdown. Get a grip.

Why did Mike Pence contradict Trump about accepting the election results?

Why did Kaine get only 30 people to his last rally in Florida?

The difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans do not always agree on everything and are not all robots spouting the same talking points day in and day out. We think for ourselves and openly disagree. When we disagree we get together and discuss it and find common ground. Dems all bow to the talking point masters.

 

[bodecea]

Because she's not the one running around screaming that the system is rigged.

Obviously.

Is this a trick question?
.

maybe for you. for most people its a legitimate question.

Let me try again:

moderator: Mrs Clinton, will you accept the results if you lose?

Killary: duh, my handlers didn't prepare me for that question, ask Huma.

You’re such a childish rightwing twit – typical of most conservatives, whining about how everyone and everything is ‘unfair’ to Trump, when in fact Trump has only himself to blame for losing the election.

In this case the idiot Trump lying about how the elections are ‘rigged,’ when nothing could be further from the truth.

Look at all of the coverage the mainstream media has given Trump, and he and his minions complain.

The complaint is that his own words are being quoted....how dare they?

 

[BlindBoo]

Looks like she did answer the question.

Clinton: This is a mind-set. This is how Donald thinks, and it's funny, but it's also really troubling. That is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them, and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished--

(Applause)

Wallace: Hold on, folks.

Clinton:-- It just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's be clear about what he's saying and what that means. He's denigrating, he is talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.



Read more: Full transcript: Third 2016 presidential debate
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook