Why Trump is Right About Growing Revenues by Ending the EPA

[JimBowie1958]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

 

[Indeependent]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Debates leave no time for context or expansion of thought.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Debates leave no time for context or expansion of thought.

Yes, true, but I think he could have tossed something like 'unfettered economic growth would bring in huge revenues too so it isnt just a matter of cutting the direct spending, revenues will increase HUGELY.' etc.

 

[Indeependent]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Debates leave no time for context or expansion of thought.

Yes, true, but I think he could have tossed something like 'unfettered economic growth would bring in huge revenues too so it isnt just a matter of cutting the direct spending, revenues will increase HUGELY.' etc.

He mentions this in his one hour interviews.
Debates are a farce.

 

[Care4all]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

 

[Skylar]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

So total taxes collected would jump by nearly a 1/3...if we got rid of the EPA?

That seems wildly unrealistic.

 

[Indeependent]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

I am also bothered by the anti-EPA sentiment.

 

[kiwiman127]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Two words; Respiratory Disease.
It's a fact the Respiratory Therapy industry can't keep up with the demand for Respiratory Therapist and Respiratory Deaths have been increasing by crazy numbers.
What's more important? Money or human lives.

 

[jc456]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

I am also bothered by the anti-EPA sentiment.

And then you want to bitch that there's no jobs in America

 

[jc456]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Two words; Respiratory Disease.
It's a fact the Respiratory Therapy industry can't keep up with the demand for Respiratory Therapist and Respiratory Deaths have been increasing by crazy numbers.
What's more important? Money or human lives.

That's a stupid question you know it's money

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Why Trump is Right About Growing Revenues by Ending the EPA"

Trump is wrong, as usual.

'Getting rid' of the EPA is completely unwarranted, in addition to being reckless and irresponsible.

 

[JimBowie1958]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

Of course it is but the EPA has been hijacked by wack jobs who are classifying carbon dioxide, you know the thing that plants need to BREATH, as a pollutant. That is retarded.

We need to shut down the EPA and shift its one time responsibilities to someone that can handle the job better, like maybe the Interior department.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Two words; Respiratory Disease.
It's a fact the Respiratory Therapy industry can't keep up with the demand for Respiratory Therapist and Respiratory Deaths have been increasing by crazy numbers.
What's more important? Money or human lives.

We do not need a bunch of Marxists in the EPA to pursue such remedy.

 

[jc456]

"Why Trump is Right About Growing Revenues by Ending the EPA"

Trump is wrong, as usual.

'Getting rid' of the EPA is completely unwarranted, in addition to being reckless and irresponsible.

You don't get it

 

[RodISHI]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Two words; Respiratory Disease.
It's a fact the Respiratory Therapy industry can't keep up with the demand for Respiratory Therapist and Respiratory Deaths have been increasing by crazy numbers.
What's more important? Money or human lives.

If human lives were ever important to the commerce class we wouldn't have so much toxic radiated shit leaking all over the country. GMO's and the associated chemicals wouldn't be an issue, pharmaceutical companies would not have such a powerful lobby, nor would the chemical pushers, the roads would be all made of higher quality materials or concrete, water wouldn't be saturated with flouride and other shit, the list could go on and on.

 

[JimBowie1958]

"Why Trump is Right About Growing Revenues by Ending the EPA"

Trump is wrong, as usual.

'Getting rid' of the EPA is completely unwarranted, in addition to being reckless and irresponsible.

You don't get it

Clayton is an idiot troll.

 

[jc456]

"Why Trump is Right About Growing Revenues by Ending the EPA"

Trump is wrong, as usual.

'Getting rid' of the EPA is completely unwarranted, in addition to being reckless and irresponsible.

You don't get it

Clayton is an idiot troll.

It was just simple to make that statement

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

EPA policy has choked off economies to the point of killing off poor people in third world countries. So choose your poison.

 

[Indeependent]

At what expense to the people's health and life? Is that not worth anything anymore?

I am also bothered by the anti-EPA sentiment.

And then you want to bitch that there's no jobs in America

You want pollution?
Fine.

 

[Syriusly]

You know, Trump missed a chance to further explain how ending the EPA will do more than just save $8 billion. It will also unfetter new growth.

The Many Problems of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and Climate Regulations: A Primer

• An average annual employment shortfall of nearly 300,000 jobs;
• A peak employment shortfall of more than 1 million jobs;
• A loss of more than $2.5 trillion (inflation-adjusted) in aggregate gross domestic product (GDP); and
• A total income loss of more than $7,000 (inflation-adjusted) per person.

Getting rid of the EPA would put at least $1 trillion in the US treasuries pocket annually from unfettered economic growth.

Yippee- we could be like China......