U2Edge
Gold Member
- Sep 15, 2012
- 5,275
- 1,199
- 130
- Thread starter
- #61
Again, lethality rates to children are irrelevant. Anyone that is less likely to die from the virus becomes a good spreader for the virus.
Its lethality to younger people is irrelevant. In fact, the lower lethality makes children more dangerous as spreaders of the virus, which just reinforces the need to keep them isolated.
Read the article, tard.
Again, lethality rates to children are irrelevant. Anyone that is less likely to die from the virus becomes a good spreader for the virus.
Again, read the article, tard.
Again, read the article, tard. If you want to live your life wallowing in ignorance go right ahead. That seems to be the only thing you're good at, so maybe stop running your mouth.
If you read the article, and there is anything that could contradict what I'm saying, you should know it, and express it here. But obviously you have NOTHING.