Why Republicans (RINO's) hate Thomas Massie

Dude is an asshole.

Well... he is strange...:dunno:


"The ONLY Republican. Let that sink in. Massie needs to be primaried immediately. You dont get to call yourself a Republican and then vote to let illegals decide our elections."
 
I don't get why he lies about Massie? If Massie was really that bad, Trump wouldn't have to lie about him.
It isn't hard to figure out. Massie cosponsored the bill leading to the passage of the law trump is breaking. The Epstein Transparency Act.
 
Big long list of Jeff FlakeMassie foulups. Any truth? Perfect for phony closeted Obiden middlers. Uh, no thanks.



Voted to raise the debt ceiling? I thought he was a "libertarian-leaning" Republican?

What?!?!?!

dblack were those his own two feet that he's not afraid to stand on, or high heels bought with money borrowed for my grandkids to pay for?
 
It isn't hard to figure out. Massie cosponsored the bill leading to the passage of the law trump is breaking. The Epstein Transparency Act.
And again we ask... "why is Trump trying SO DAMN HARD to stop the release of these files?"

And again MAGA pretend it isn't happening.
 
//* Being an outsider I had never heard of JakeFlakeMassi until PHONY BOARD MIDDLERS began to chirp this month? If voting means anything and this is True? Not all his D votes could be justified? See middlers run now. So predictable *//

 
If you have to lie to make a point, then you really don't have a point. Do you?


Big long list of Jeff FlakeMassie foulups. Any truth? Perfect for phony closeted Obiden middlers. Uh, no thanks.



The statement is mostly false or misleading, as several claims misrepresent Rep. Thomas Massie's (R-KY) actual voting record. He is a libertarian-leaning conservative who often breaks with GOP leadership on procedural or principled grounds (e.g., fiscal conservatism, free speech concerns, or opposition to rushed processes), but the list paints a distorted picture of him as routinely anti-conservative or pro-Democrat. Here's a breakdown of each claim based on available records:
  • Votes against bringing the Save America Act to the House floor: False/misleading. Massie voted against a procedural rule to advance the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration), but he explicitly stated it was due to the rule suspending normal House procedures (e.g., allowing spending bills without 24-hour notice). He clarified the rumor was false, said he'd vote for the bill on final passage, and did vote yes when it came to the floor (e.g., he posted about voting YES on the SAVE America Act to require voter ID).
  • Votes to raise the debt ceiling under Biden: True (in at least one key instance). Massie supported advancing the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act (the Biden-McCarthy debt ceiling deal/suspension through 2025), including voting in the Rules Committee to allow it to the floor and on final passage. This was a bipartisan compromise to avoid default, though he has historically opposed debt ceiling increases and criticized them as "kicking the can down the road."
  • Votes against a law to take down revenge porn: True. In 2025, Massie was one of only two House members (both Republicans) to vote no on the TAKE IT DOWN Act (criminalizing nonconsensual intimate deepfakes/AI-generated revenge porn). He explained his opposition as concern it was a "slippery slope, ripe for abuse, with unintended consequences" (free speech/civil liberties worries).
  • Votes against border security funding: Partially true/misleading in context. Massie has opposed some omnibus or consolidated spending bills that include border/DHS funding, often citing overall spending levels, unrelated provisions, or procedural issues. However, he has supported targeted border security measures in other contexts. Recent examples show him voting against certain DHS appropriations packages (e.g., one in 2026), but not a blanket opposition to all border funding.
  • Votes against ICE funding: True in specific instances. In a 2026 DHS appropriations bill (which included ~$10 billion for ICE), Massie was the lone Republican to vote no (joining most Democrats), reportedly due to concerns over aspects like funding for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (which he accused of online censorship). This fits his pattern of opposing large spending bills.
  • Votes to protect Adam Schiff from real consequences for lying: True (in effect). In 2023, Massie was among ~20 Republicans who voted to table (kill) a resolution censuring Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) over his role in Trump-Russia investigations. Massie opposed it primarily due to a clause proposing a $16 million fine on Schiff (calling it unconstitutional and a bad precedent that could be used against conservatives).
  • Votes against censuring Ilhan Omar: True in some instances. Massie voted against (or to table) at least one effort to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), such as a 2025 resolution tied to her comments on a conservative figure. He has also opposed removing her from committees in earlier votes (e.g., 2023), aligning with a small group of Republicans concerned about free speech or precedent.
  • Votes with Democrats to try to eliminate Trump’s tariffs: True in a procedural sense. In 2026, Massie joined Democrats (and a couple other Republicans) to defeat a GOP procedural move that would have blocked votes/challenges to Trump's tariffs. This effectively allowed potential disapproval resolutions to proceed, reflecting his free-market views (opposition to tariffs as taxes on Americans).
Overall, Massie aligns with conservative positions on many issues (e.g., he supported the SAVE Act on final passage and has a strong record on gun rights, fiscal restraint, and opposing foreign aid). However, he frequently votes against party leadership on procedural votes, large spending bills, or measures he sees as overreach (e.g., on speech or debt). The statement selectively frames these as "anti-conservative" without context, often exaggerating or misstating procedural votes as opposition to the underlying policy. His overall Heritage Action scorecard and voting patterns show him as highly conservative, though not always in lockstep with GOP leadership.
 

Attachments

  • 1770911112296.webp
    1770911112296.webp
    39.5 KB · Views: 2
A Democrat wearing an American flag pin.

^^^^ This is a lie.

Trump has spent more money than all other Republicans and 9/10ths of the democrats, combined.
Still supports true forms of socialism.
Wants to eliminate the debt ceiling all together
Wants H1B's ahead of American's with college educations.
Assaulted our 2A.
Let the DoJ write gun laws
Spend $8 trillion in 4 years.
Vetoed only 1 spending bill in 5 years
Tried to shove a national healthcare plan down our throats.
Increase the debt ceiling 5 times and suspend it for 2 years.
Reauthorized warrantless spying on Americans
Tried to give blacks $500 billion just for being black (The Platinum Plan)
Gave rich foreign countries like Israel $5 billion every year
Give historical black colleges a millions
Give women's organizations millions.
Pledge to have the Federal Government pay for women IVF's
Kept most of the Epstein files hidden or redacted
Regime change war(s)


But Massie is the democrat. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
If you have to lie to make a point, then you really don't have a point. Do you?



The statement is mostly false or misleading, as several claims misrepresent Rep. Thomas Massie's (R-KY) actual voting record. He is a libertarian-leaning conservative who often breaks with GOP leadership on procedural or principled grounds (e.g., fiscal conservatism, free speech concerns, or opposition to rushed processes), but the list paints a distorted picture of him as routinely anti-conservative or pro-Democrat. Here's a breakdown of each claim based on available records:
  • Votes against bringing the Save America Act to the House floor: False/misleading. Massie voted against a procedural rule to advance the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration), but he explicitly stated it was due to the rule suspending normal House procedures (e.g., allowing spending bills without 24-hour notice). He clarified the rumor was false, said he'd vote for the bill on final passage, and did vote yes when it came to the floor (e.g., he posted about voting YES on the SAVE America Act to require voter ID).
  • Votes to raise the debt ceiling under Biden: True (in at least one key instance). Massie supported advancing the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act (the Biden-McCarthy debt ceiling deal/suspension through 2025), including voting in the Rules Committee to allow it to the floor and on final passage. This was a bipartisan compromise to avoid default, though he has historically opposed debt ceiling increases and criticized them as "kicking the can down the road."
  • Votes against a law to take down revenge porn: True. In 2025, Massie was one of only two House members (both Republicans) to vote no on the TAKE IT DOWN Act (criminalizing nonconsensual intimate deepfakes/AI-generated revenge porn). He explained his opposition as concern it was a "slippery slope, ripe for abuse, with unintended consequences" (free speech/civil liberties worries).
  • Votes against border security funding: Partially true/misleading in context. Massie has opposed some omnibus or consolidated spending bills that include border/DHS funding, often citing overall spending levels, unrelated provisions, or procedural issues. However, he has supported targeted border security measures in other contexts. Recent examples show him voting against certain DHS appropriations packages (e.g., one in 2026), but not a blanket opposition to all border funding.
  • Votes against ICE funding: True in specific instances. In a 2026 DHS appropriations bill (which included ~$10 billion for ICE), Massie was the lone Republican to vote no (joining most Democrats), reportedly due to concerns over aspects like funding for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (which he accused of online censorship). This fits his pattern of opposing large spending bills.
  • Votes to protect Adam Schiff from real consequences for lying: True (in effect). In 2023, Massie was among ~20 Republicans who voted to table (kill) a resolution censuring Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) over his role in Trump-Russia investigations. Massie opposed it primarily due to a clause proposing a $16 million fine on Schiff (calling it unconstitutional and a bad precedent that could be used against conservatives).
  • Votes against censuring Ilhan Omar: True in some instances. Massie voted against (or to table) at least one effort to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), such as a 2025 resolution tied to her comments on a conservative figure. He has also opposed removing her from committees in earlier votes (e.g., 2023), aligning with a small group of Republicans concerned about free speech or precedent.
  • Votes with Democrats to try to eliminate Trump’s tariffs: True in a procedural sense. In 2026, Massie joined Democrats (and a couple other Republicans) to defeat a GOP procedural move that would have blocked votes/challenges to Trump's tariffs. This effectively allowed potential disapproval resolutions to proceed, reflecting his free-market views (opposition to tariffs as taxes on Americans).
Overall, Massie aligns with conservative positions on many issues (e.g., he supported the SAVE Act on final passage and has a strong record on gun rights, fiscal restraint, and opposing foreign aid). However, he frequently votes against party leadership on procedural votes, large spending bills, or measures he sees as overreach (e.g., on speech or debt). The statement selectively frames these as "anti-conservative" without context, often exaggerating or misstating procedural votes as opposition to the underlying policy. His overall Heritage Action scorecard and voting patterns show him as highly conservative, though not always in lockstep with GOP leadership.
That describes a man who looked for reasons to vote with the so calls opposition as often as possible to get his name in the papers.

Except for the take it down act in which he apparently voted against nearly everybody else. His excuse for protecting these deep fake revenge porn jerks is absurd. There is no first amendment right to make fake hardcore porn featuring a person with no participation or interest in being depicted that way.
 
15th post
That describes a man who looked for reasons to vote with the so calls opposition as often as possible to get his name in the papers.

Except for the take it down act in which he apparently voted against nearly everybody else. His excuse for protecting these deep fake revenge porn jerks is absurd. There is no first amendment right to make fake hardcore porn featuring a person with no participation or interest in being depicted that way.

"Nope, that's a gross misrepresentation. Massie didn't vote to 'protect deepfake revenge porn jerks'—he voted NO on the TAKE IT DOWN Act because he called it 'a slippery slope, ripe for abuse, with unintended consequences.' (Direct quote from his post-vote statement.)He wasn't defending nonconsensual content; he was concerned about free speech risks, overbroad takedown powers without strong safeguards, and federal overreach—classic libertarian-conservative worries shared by groups like EFF. The bill passed anyway (409-2) and Trump signed it, so the law is in place.
Massie has a strong conservative record overall (high Heritage Action scores, supports border security when not buried in pork, etc.), but he breaks from party on procedural/spending votes or when he sees constitutional issues. That's consistency, not 'looking for reasons to vote with opposition.' Cherry-picking one vote to bash him ignores the full picture."
 
You might as well post polls fron CNN. Media hogwash does not impress. The sacred vote is corrupt 25% in some counties? Yet you post on polls or media stories?

Remember Wolf cage dancing at the Obiden victory party? USAID was on again. Paying the media..yes oh yes.

Yeah, we get it. You RINO's don't like constitutional conservatism. And you're going to troll with lies and fake news to bash him. Even though he votes with the GOP 91% of the time. And is only doing the things Trump said he was going to do.

Are y'all mad because he didn't flip flop with Trump?
 
Yeah, we get it. You RINO's don't like constitutional conservatism. And you're going to troll with lies and fake news to bash him. Even though he votes with the GOP 91% of the time. And is only doing the things Trump said he was going to do.

Are y'all mad because he didn't flip flop with Trump?


That's like saying a guy kills ten at his work site. Then you say 91 made it out alive. Its the severity perhaps. I don't know. But since I just heard of this guy this month? It's TDS on a JeffFlake level apparently?

It's not the motion its the meat.


After stolen 2020 it is no time for selfish TDS grandstanding by middlers. The Country is nearly being destroyed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom