Why Republicans (RINO's) hate Thomas Massie

[YoursTruly]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I was looking at this earlier. If anyone has watched Breaking Bad, they know what it could be used for. But that acid being what it is, and the lack of real investigations, then there's no way to prove it wasn't for the maintenance of the pool and other things.

But we all know OJ killed those two people. Just like we know what they used the acid for.

Breaking Bad used Hydrofloric acid

 

[skye]

skye , you've got a little something on your nose.

View attachment 1218799

And you have something big in your a**s

 

[YoursTruly]

And you have abig something in your a**.

It's called a Trump. And I'll be getting rid of in the morning. Like I do every morning.

But in your honor of all your loyalty to him and every pedophile around the world who'll never be brought to justice because of our corrupt government, I may call it a "skye."

 

[OldFlame]

Pathetic

Imagine if I were AG and had an AI program to sort through ALL of the unredacted files

I asked you a specific question: Bill Clinton, the most prominent and prolific person in the files, tons of pictures, records of flights, emails, etc... is there enough evidence to indict and convict Bill Clinton? It's a yes or no answer.

 

[skye]

It's called a Trump. And I'll be getting rid of in the morning. Like I do every morning.

But in your honor of all your loyalty to him and every pedophile around the world who'll never be brought to justice because of our corrupt government, I may call it a "skye."

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I asked you a specific question: Bill Clinton, the most prominent and prolific person in the files, tons of pictures, records of flights, emails, etc... is there enough evidence to indict and convict Bill Clinton? It's a yes or no answer.

Yes. There was eyewitness testimony as well

 

[OldFlame]

Yes. There was eyewitness testimony as well

What is this evidence going to indict/convict him for?

 

[YoursTruly]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What is this evidence going to indict/convict him for?

You seem proud and happy he walked

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What is this evidence going to indict/convict him for?

Virginia Guiffre was under 18 at the time

 

[OldFlame]

You seem proud and happy he walked

I despise him. I'm just a realist, and I know that from a legal standpoint, even though he and his ***** wife are guilty of many crimes, that there's not enough evidence to indict and convict him of child trafficking, rape, assault, or anything else. I'm sure there's a special place in hell for both him and his 'wife'. I'm content knowing they will face justice at some point. I'm just not going to bad mouth and throw the Trump admin under the bus because there's not enough evidence for them to do what you want them to do.

 

[OldFlame]

Virginia Guiffre was under 18 at the time

You have no proof that he did anything other than get his picture taken with her though. Unfortunately in a court of law, that's not enough, and it's naive to believe that there's enough other evidence to convict him of anything.

 

[YoursTruly]

I despise him. I'm just a realist, and I know that from a legal standpoint, even though he and his ***** wife are guilty of many crimes, that there's not enough evidence to indict and convict him of child trafficking, rape, assault, or anything else. I'm sure there's a special place in hell for both him and his 'wife'. I'm content knowing they will face justice at some point. I'm just not going to bad mouth and throw the Trump admin under the bus because there's not enough evidence for them to do what you want them to do.

HA, Trump supporters forced to defend the Clintons.

OMG, the loyalty of you RINO's is at a higher level than religion.

 

[OldFlame]

HA, Trump supporters forced to defend the Clintons.

OMG, the loyalty of you RINO's is at a higher level than religion.

You're not very bright if you think that post was defending Clinton.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You have no proof that he did anything other than get his picture taken with her though. Unfortunately in a court of law, that's not enough, and it's naive to believe that there's enough other evidence to convict him of anything.

We have her testimony…oh no wait she’s dead

What is it you’re trying to say?

 

[OldFlame]

We have her testimony…oh no wait she’s dead

What is it you’re trying to say?

You apparently don't know much about her either.

Any lawyer would tell you they don't have enough evidence to indict and convict all/any the people mentioned in the files. You can continue to rage against the Trump admin if that makes you feel better, but it's not going to change that fact unless more/other evidence comes out.

 

[YoursTruly]

You apparently don't know much about her either.

Any lawyer would tell you they don't have enough evidence to indict and convict all/any the people mentioned in the files. You can continue to rage against the Trump admin if that makes you feel better, but it's not going to change that fact unless more/other evidence comes out.

Every lawyer in the world would tell you they'd have to see all the files first.

 

[OldFlame]

Every lawyer in the world would tell you they'd have to see all the files first.

Your buddy Massie has, when will he start to name names, and publish the evidence to convict them that is right in the files?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You apparently don't know much about her either.

Any lawyer would tell you they don't have enough evidence to indict and convict all/any the people mentioned in the files. You can continue to rage against the Trump admin if that makes you feel better, but it's not going to change that fact unless more/other evidence comes out.

What’s your dog in this fight? To me, it looks like you’re defending and excusing the criminals