So....as usual, you have no way to counter my posts, but to object to the format?
And your claim is that you see no connection between his
"...he heard from the opposite party's leadership in Congress that their NUMBER ONE goal was to ensure he was a one term President."
And my response that politics is a blood sport?
I have to gloat over how jejune and empty your attempts have become.
When they are are insipid at this one, you might as well throw in the towel.
B12.
Try some B12 shots.
No, Dummy, you really didn't answer my question at all. All you said was "politics is tough" is essentially. You didn't actually name the last president who had the opposing literally say that their number one goal was assuring he didn't win a second term.
I mean, we all know WHY you didn't answer the question. You're ducking. You know as soon as you answer that question honestly you have to cut Obama a ton of slack because you will be admitting to the unprecedented levels of obstructionism that the GOP has been engaged in.
Seriously, your hubris is so comical because it's like you're a AA-player who called up to the bigs, gets one at bat and strikes out on three straight curveballs. You're not smart, you're not intellectual. All your response to my question did was blow more of your dumb ******* hot air into the discussion.
We all know politics is tough, Dummy. You didn't blow the lid off of anything there. So, do you want to take another stab at actually answering my question, or just admit that you can't answer it directly because you'll lose a ton of intellectual ground in your retarded thread?