Why not Tulsi?

But I do vote, and I'm still not sure what "Hindi" -- which is a language by the way --- has to do with a candy's quals.
Not sure she even speaks Hindi, but if she did it wouldn't be a reason she shouldn't hold an office.

True ----- if she were running for Mayor of Bombay, maybe.
 
I like any party that will keep leftists out of our government. At the moment, that's the Republican party.
You are fooling yourself. Very little difference between the two criminal gangs. If you can’t see that, you’re blind.


that was true in the past, but today's democrats are not the democrats of Kennedy and Truman, or even LBJ. They are far left socialists whose goal is to destroy the basic principles of this country. If there are some Kennedy/Truman democrats left, give us a list of their names
BS. Both parties are owned and controlled by wealthy private interests. They both do the bidding of these wealthy interests.

You want to believe your beloved R party is somehow better and you need to demonize the D party. Total waste of time.


that's your opinion and until the libs that you support take power, you are free to express it, after they take power we will all be told what we can and cannot say in public, I guess you are too dumb to understand that.
No doubt you thought that when O got elected, but your little fear party never transpired. Somehow you never learn.


"if you like your plan you can keep it"

pallets of cash sent to Iran

Hillary not charged because she didn't intend to violate law

comey lied under oath but walks free today

some of it DID happen,
 
I like any party that will keep leftists out of our government. At the moment, that's the Republican party.
You are fooling yourself. Very little difference between the two criminal gangs. If you can’t see that, you’re blind.


that was true in the past, but today's democrats are not the democrats of Kennedy and Truman, or even LBJ. They are far left socialists whose goal is to destroy the basic principles of this country. If there are some Kennedy/Truman democrats left, give us a list of their names
BS. Both parties are owned and controlled by wealthy private interests. They both do the bidding of these wealthy interests.

You want to believe your beloved R party is somehow better and you need to demonize the D party. Total waste of time.
Bullshit. There are basic differences between the two parties, and you know what they are: killing babies, bowing down to fags, gun-grabbing, government control. VS freedom, liberty, and property rights.
Are you really that stupid?
Silly. The R party until recently has done nothing to stop the baby killing. Zero. No R potus even bothered to attend the Right to Life March in DC, until Don went last month. What federal legislation has the R Congress passed since Roe, that curtails abortion?

“bowing down to fags”. Now that’s dumb but typical of a bigot.

Has the D party taken your guns? The Rs won’t stop them if they ever try.

The Rs have done a good job of allowing our rights to be diminished. They aren’t protecting shit.

wake up!


you are very confused. why are you still living in such a fucked up country?
 
Got anymore candidate recommendations for us today gipper?

Maybe you should recommend Pete, Amy, Bloomy, Bernie or Joe so that none of us will want to vote for them either! :lol:
I didn’t recommend Tulsi. You missed the point of the OP entirely.
 
You are fooling yourself. Very little difference between the two criminal gangs. If you can’t see that, you’re blind.


that was true in the past, but today's democrats are not the democrats of Kennedy and Truman, or even LBJ. They are far left socialists whose goal is to destroy the basic principles of this country. If there are some Kennedy/Truman democrats left, give us a list of their names
BS. Both parties are owned and controlled by wealthy private interests. They both do the bidding of these wealthy interests.

You want to believe your beloved R party is somehow better and you need to demonize the D party. Total waste of time.


that's your opinion and until the libs that you support take power, you are free to express it, after they take power we will all be told what we can and cannot say in public, I guess you are too dumb to understand that.
No doubt you thought that when O got elected, but your little fear party never transpired. Somehow you never learn.


"if you like your plan you can keep it"

pallets of cash sent to Iran

Hillary not charged because she didn't intend to violate law

comey lied under oath but walks free today

some of it DID happen,
Did O destroy the country?
 
But I do vote, and I'm still not sure what "Hindi" -- which is a language by the way --- has to do with a candy's quals.
Not sure she even speaks Hindi, but if she did it wouldn't be a reason she shouldn't hold an office.

True ----- if she were running for Mayor of Bombay, maybe.

You're actually suggesting that knowing a second language --- for which we have no evidence in this case anyway --- is a DISqualification for public service?

Oh do go on please. :popcorn:
 
that was true in the past, but today's democrats are not the democrats of Kennedy and Truman, or even LBJ. They are far left socialists whose goal is to destroy the basic principles of this country. If there are some Kennedy/Truman democrats left, give us a list of their names
BS. Both parties are owned and controlled by wealthy private interests. They both do the bidding of these wealthy interests.

You want to believe your beloved R party is somehow better and you need to demonize the D party. Total waste of time.


that's your opinion and until the libs that you support take power, you are free to express it, after they take power we will all be told what we can and cannot say in public, I guess you are too dumb to understand that.
No doubt you thought that when O got elected, but your little fear party never transpired. Somehow you never learn.


"if you like your plan you can keep it"

pallets of cash sent to Iran

Hillary not charged because she didn't intend to violate law

comey lied under oath but walks free today

some of it DID happen,
Did O destroy the country?


He tried, but failed
 
You're actually suggesting that knowing a second language --- for which we have no evidence in this case anyway --- is a DISqualification for public service?

Oh do go on please. :popcorn:

Shows what a bad predictor I am ---- I thought you'd complain that I didn't use Mumbai inst. of Bombay. Then I'd say I say "Burma," too. If a person is going to be a conservative, dive right into it.
 
You're actually suggesting that knowing a second language --- for which we have no evidence in this case anyway --- is a DISqualification for public service?

Oh do go on please. :popcorn:

Shows what a bad predictor I am ---- I thought you'd complain that I didn't use Mumbai inst. of Bombay. Then I'd say I say "Burma," too. If a person is going to be a conservative, dive right into it.

I still say Burma. But then again I still spell Hallowe'en with the apostrophe so linguistically I can out-conservative anybody, forsooth.
 
I still say Burma. But then again I still spell Hallowe'en with the apostrophe so linguistically I can out-conservative anybody, forsooth.

As long as you say whom as the object of a preposition, that's the great thing.
 
I don't do whom, never did. That's a stretch up with which I will not put. :eusa_snooty:

Then I suppose you are similarly lost to the subjunctive; but that is a ship long since sailed, I fear.

Mais non, perish the thought. Would that the subjunctive might be shouted from the very rooftops.

It does always remind me of a joke though.

A businessman was taking his first trip to Boston. In preparation he got all kinds of advice on what to do there including of course seafood. Lobstuh. Chowduh. Sea scallops, scrod. So he gets to his hotel, gets hungry, hails a cab and asks the driver, "where can I get scrod around here?"

Driver turns and looks amazed. "Bud I've heard that question a thousand times and you're the first guy who ever put it in the pluperfect subjunctive".

badum tsss
 

Forum List

Back
Top