They won't support it for the purposes of escalating the war. If they do quietly support it, it would be for the purposes of ensuring the negotiation will be conducted between two parties who are more on par with each other in terms of risk than the current scenario suggests.
Trump will do what he wants when he wants. You expect a lot from someone you said would never win the election.
It would be unethical for the incoming potus to comment on these things. If he did, you would be whining that he was undercutting the sitting occupant of the WH. LOL, try again
They made that decision right after long range ATACMS were secretly sent to Ukraine in April this year, which was an escalation by the West. Russia feared these might be used to target Russian soil and lo and behold they were right about that, it happened this morning.
Nobody has underestimated trump. Trump has benefitted from having enough money to play the legal system.
Because he doesn't want to show Putin his hand until he is president and has the power to do what he says he will do...
He commented on things all four years Biden has been in office.
He was making comments while running for office.
Putin doesn't have what you think he has. This is why he has struggled in Ukraine.
To describe taking a stance against war as unethical tells me all I need to know about your insanity.
It is not escalation to attack the country that is attacking you. This should have been done from the beginning.
Trump is on record numerous times as opposing this conflict in its entirety. He will take care of it in two months.
Ritter has pretty well got everything right so far.
Why not publicly condemn this escalation by Biden? seems simple enough to me.
He isn't the potus, moron. Take it up with the guy who pushed the escalation--You know, the vegetable that you've defended religiously for the past four years. How'd that work out for you?
