PratchettFan
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2012
- 7,238
- 746
- 190
Post FACTUAL links to prove what I said is not true.
You won't because you can't.
I don't have to go link running for you, you can find it yourself. Any time a company drops a person before any actual boycott, when a person is fired immediately for something outside work, any time SJW's go on a ruin a person binge for an opinion, that's an end run around the concept of the 1st amendment.
No, it isn't. Not even vaguely close. The first amendment prohibits Congress (and via hierarchy all other governments) from abridging free speech. It doesn't stop a private company or person from doing anything.
Back then the government was a threat to speech, really the biggest one. Today people who want to ban speech have found another mechanism to do it, one just as insidious as government censorship.
Then you will need to amend the Constitution. Right now the first amendment protects what you seem to want to prohibit. I would be against that.
An amendment is not needed. what is needed is companies to grow a spine, and realize that "the people" are not calling for other's heads, its a small minority of agitating assholes.
Calling people out does not automatically mean gunning for an amendment.
That would be up to the companies, and it would have to assume the companies agree with you.