meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 25,885
- 22,517
- 2,290
Whoopee ding.............it's still been filed.
And the check is in the mail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whoopee ding.............it's still been filed.
Her case is still on appeal. https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...ell-seeks-relief-us-supreme-court-2025-07-25/First off the VP has no such authority.
Second, because Maxwell had an appeal before the courts, it would be illegal to release the files until all appeals had been exhausted.
Maxwell's appeal was heard and rejected in late 2024
Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal against her sex trafficking conviction was rejected by a US court in September 2024. The court affirmed her convictions and sentence, upholding the lower court's ruling.
He claimed her case was "before" the court.How does that change the fact it’s been filed?
And South Africa got a criminal like MandelaYeah, we gotz a criminal named Trump.
It’s not in their mailbox it’s in the court houseHe claimed her case was "before" the court.
Not that it was in their mailbox.
It’s not in their mailbox it’s in the court house
That’s where cases are filed
To protect the Orange Jesus pedo.Ghislaine Maxwell Sentenced To 20 Years In Prison For Conspiring With Jeffrey Epstein To Sexually Abuse Minors
I seem to recall Repubs having a moral panic over grooming when the term was hysterically being used as a cudgel during the 2024 election cycle. Groomers here, groomers there, groomers under the kid's beds.
Ghislaine Maxwell groomed young women for trump's close friend Jeff. It's why she sits in prison. In a highly unusual act, the Asst. US AG and former trump defense attorney, thus a trusted minion, has been dispatched to...........to do what exactly? What is being discussed with this poor excuse for a human being? Or Maxwell for that matter.
Would trump be willing to do the unthinkable? Cut some sort of deal with her to quell the drumbeat calling for more info? Wouldn't that make the drums louder? And why is the #2 at the DoJ spending time on this when he is so busy making the country safer for Americans.![]()
If a tree falls, and there's no one to hear it?Because we didn’t hear it
In your face !!!!
There's only a 1% chance the court will accept it.Her case is still on appeal. https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...ell-seeks-relief-us-supreme-court-2025-07-25/
So I guess trump can’t release the file
Well that’s because the people elected him and not a black guy…not sure your point? Should people just not run for office and allow black guy to just because they are black??He's not allowing the blacks to come into power and rule the nation.
Not sure your point. It’s still filed and pendingThere's only a 1% chance the court will accept it.
The court hasn't acted on her application for a writ.
Harris was a tree? Well, we might agree on that…worst VP in historyIf a tree falls, and there's no one to hear it?
It's effectively over.Not sure your point. It’s still filed and pending
You claimed that’s why xiden couldn’t release it, it was on appeal. Shouldn’t trump not release it since it’s still pending?
No it’s not, it’s still pending, the court hasn’t ruled yetIt's effectively over.
The USSC will not take the case (99% probability)
Her case was "before" the court of appeals.Not sure your point. It’s still filed and pending
You claimed that’s why xiden couldn’t release it, it was on appeal. Shouldn’t trump not release it since it’s still pending?
Not yet, it’s pending, it could be, right now she filed and it’s pending. It will be reviewed and they will decide if they want to hear more or dismiss itHer case was "before" the court of appeals.
It is NOT "before" the USSC.
You claimed you could prove something didn't happen, because you were not aware of it.Harris was a tree? Well, we might agree on that…worst VP in history
I know it didn’t happen. I searched Google, there is no headlines where harris is using her voice to get the Epstein files releasedYou claimed you could prove something didn't happen, because you were not aware of it.
Take a course in logic, one of the first edicts is you can't prove a negative.
The saying "you can't prove a negative" is a simplification that highlights the challenges of proving universal negative statements and the burden of proof in debates.