Dear
yumegari
Thank you for spelling everything out in detail for this thread.
The objections I find are the opposite
And trying to force the Internal faith based identity onto the public to replace the physical definitions of sex as biological male/female.
You are right, the whole point is these are distinct.
The internal personal beliefs and identity/affiliations of the individual are separate from the generic neutral definitions of male/female based on sex determined by chromosomes.
The conflict is over the faith based personal preferences and choices that individuals decide which are outside govt jurisdiction and public policies.
The problem is the liberals who believe in using govt authority to protect individual rights are going too far and writing policies that are biased specifically toward LGBT, and even punishing and discriminating against people of other beliefs, instead of policies remaining all inclusive and neutral to protect all people of all beliefs.
As for not being a mental disorder, some cases are unnatural disorders caused by sexual abuse. So neither assumption is true for all cases.
Some cases are natural some unnatural.
Some people change with therapy because they recognize they were abuses and the conditions are not natural and not right for them. Some cannot change and do not want to.
Not all cases are the same.
These remain faith based and up to each person.
The govt has no jurisdiction to manage or mandate faith based policies.
This is the key reason for objection to trying to use govt to impose LGBT policies.
