Why I Support Segregation

[flacaltenn]

France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

You're more than likely wrong. You're talking about a black person running moonshine in klan country.

Major trait of racists is how wrong the information they distribute really is.. Never talked with white racist that EVER had accurate links or information.. And your GUESS about moonshining is just as bad...

Wendell Scott online

Wendell Oliver Scott was a race car driver who won over 128 races in his career in various divisions including a win in the Grand National series, now known as the NASCAR Sprint Cup series. He finished as high as sixth in points in NASCAR’s top series, numerous times in the top-15 in points. Scott won the Richmond track championship and the Virginia State Sportsman title. What makes his accomplishments more intriguing is Scott did this one of the lowest budgets of any team. While many teams had manufacturer backing Scott did nearly all the work on the car himself using mainly used parts and second-hand cars. His sons served often as his pit crew and even Wendell himself pitted his own car. Scott did not even start racing until the age of 30. A former moonshine hauler, Scott developed his driving style on the backroads of Virginia doing his own hot-rodding of his car.

When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

After that 1st win where he was screwed out of the trophy -- it was SCOTT who SAID those that.. Not an admission that what was NASCAR was thinking.. And Scott was PROBABLY CORRECT... But your source makes it a "done deal" that was the intent... That was in the Stone Age when it required individual "lap counters' people to tally a win.. No GPS sensors, no automatic scoring.. So people fucked up all the time.. And MANY races ended in contention and brawls...


Wendell Scott online

When Scott won in the NASCAR Grand National race at Jacksonville, Florida in 1963 they did not wave the checkered flag for him but initially gave the win to Buck Baker. NASCAR officials said a scoring error was responsible for allowing Baker to accept the winner’s trophy. Scott doubted that explanation. “Everybody in the place knew I had won the race,” he said years later, “but the promoters and NASCAR officials didn’t want me out there kissing any beauty queens or accepting any awards.” While NASCAR did later give the win to Scott, he did not receive the trophy which was reportedly misplaced. 47 years later in 2010 the Scott family was presented a replica trophy. Through all the prejudice he endured, Wendell never retaliated.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

Doubt this ever happened that way.. Even the top teams have no guaranteed performance under race day conditions.. And there's no such thing as a "phony" car.. They all have to meet qualifying speeds. They ALL are tightly regulated by NASCAR.. He got an opportunity to get in a seat on a "rich team" because their driver was injured/sick/suspended or something.. And maybe it was a last minute thing so that THAT TEAM wouldn't lose points. Without the adequate practice time in the seat, they can't set it up properly for the driver..

This is all BULLSHIT to create the impression that "he was set up for embarrassment".. He had NOTHIHG to be embarrassed about....

Go argue that with the NASCAR historian that wrote the story.

He ain't no NASCAR historian.. If he does not know there are NO spare "phony" race cars to prank people with at a NASCAR event.. You don't get to drive another team's car UNLESS there's a last minute or day problem with the driver..

You go read his book and tell me WHAT race, WHAT year and I'll prove it...

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

Published Thursday, January 15, 2009
by Brian Donovan, Special To The Post

As we move toward Martin Luther King Day, Barack Obama’s inauguration and the Daytona 500, it’s an appropriate moment to consider the unusual life of another remarkable racial pioneer: NASCAR’s first black driver, the late Wendell Scott.

A talented racer, Scott began banging fenders with roughneck competitors on Dixie dirt tracks in 1952, during an era when he couldn’t use a white restroom or drinking fountain. The story of his frustrating struggle, little known outside of the racing world, offers a reminder of how much our country has changed – but also of how NASCAR’s progress toward diversity still seems stuck in the past.

Scott’s dream of becoming a competitive national-level racer depended on support from NASCAR’s celebrated founder and czar, the late Bill France Sr. At first, Scott’s prospects looked promising. Early on, France assured him he’d always be treated without prejudice. In the minor leagues Scott won dozens of races and a Virginia state championship.

Like Obama, Scott, who lived in Danville, Va., and often raced in Charlotte, developed surprising numbers of admirers among ordinary white folks in the South. He became one of NASCAR’s most popular drivers, even as an underdog without the corporate sponsorship for a competitive racecar. His passionate determination inspired fans to reconsider racial stereotypes. Unfortunately, his support in the grandstands wasn’t matched in NASCAR’s executive suites.

As the growing civil rights struggle in the ‘60s inflamed racial tensions, France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

For years South Carolina’s major track, Darlington Raceway, banned Scott because he was black. This cost him any chance for sponsorship. France addressed the problem with inaction and silence. When Scott finally asked for help, he said France told him that Darlington was important to NASCAR’s success and Scott should just be patient.

When senior NASCAR officials and major promoters mistreated Scott, France continued his hands-off neutrality. One official abused his authority and excluded Scott from an important race at Charlotte. Others did the same thing at the speedways in Daytona Beach, Fla., and Martinsville, Va. – facilities in which France owned major financial interests. Repeatedly, officials harassed Scott over trivial issues: his son’s beards, minor blemishes in his car’s paint.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

France helped other drivers obtain sponsorship for competitive cars, but not Scott. The pattern of unfairness persisted, insiders say, largely because France and other influential executives in the NASCAR world believed that a competitive black driver would be bad for business. At the time France was cultivating alliances with leading segregationist politicians such as Alabama Governor George Wallace, and those relationships helped NASCAR to grow into today’s multi-billion-dollar enterprise.

Many of the biased actions toward Scott took place as France was negotiating successfully with Wallace for millions of dollars in state subsidies for a huge new speedway at Talladega. Wallace never would have approved that money if NASCAR’s lone black driver had any chance of winning.

Today, more than 35 years after Scott’s last race, America’s racial situation has improved drastically. But NASCAR remains the country’s least diverse major sport, despite a diversity program launched eight years ago. Every regular driver in NASCAR’s three national series is still a white male.

Some of Scott’s admirers feel that some official recognition for him from NASCAR is long overdue – perhaps at the new hall of fame NASCAR is opening this year, perhaps even a public apology for the bigotry he suffered. Others believe an apology would be quite unlikely, since NASCAR, still owned by the France family, says it knows nothing about any unfair treatment of Scott.

BRIAN DONOVAN, a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, is the author of “Hard Driving: The American Odyssey of NASCAR’s First Black Driver.”

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

You got a problem? Argue with him about it.

So I tell you this guy doesn't know jack shit about NASCAR and you just REPOST the article?? Holy shit..

You highlighted the evidence.. He wrote ONE BOOK about ONE Black NASCAR driver... That does not make him "a NASCAR historian"... In fact -- it was his ONLY book and he had ZERO background in motor sports of any kind...

This is why you FLOCK to tales of woes that you can add to that treasure trove of racism that you deny you create and fling onto this forum weekly... You DO collect a lot of stuff that is marginally truthful or even vetted.. Like the white people who AGREE with you that Hallmark Cards, and Princess Hair and Dance Team make-up are examples of racism....

From the Wiki on Brian Donovan --

Career[edit]
He first worked for three years at the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, and was then hired by Newsday in 1967. He retired from Newsday in 2002 to focus on a book, "Hard Driving" about Wendell Scott.[4]

One of the SHORTEST bios I've ever read on a "Pulitzer Prize winning journalist"...

 

[IM2]

France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

You're more than likely wrong. You're talking about a black person running moonshine in klan country.

Major trait of racists is how wrong the information they distribute really is.. Never talked with white racist that EVER had accurate links or information.. And your GUESS about moonshining is just as bad...

Wendell Scott online

Wendell Oliver Scott was a race car driver who won over 128 races in his career in various divisions including a win in the Grand National series, now known as the NASCAR Sprint Cup series. He finished as high as sixth in points in NASCAR’s top series, numerous times in the top-15 in points. Scott won the Richmond track championship and the Virginia State Sportsman title. What makes his accomplishments more intriguing is Scott did this one of the lowest budgets of any team. While many teams had manufacturer backing Scott did nearly all the work on the car himself using mainly used parts and second-hand cars. His sons served often as his pit crew and even Wendell himself pitted his own car. Scott did not even start racing until the age of 30. A former moonshine hauler, Scott developed his driving style on the backroads of Virginia doing his own hot-rodding of his car.

When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

After that 1st win where he was screwed out of the trophy -- it was SCOTT who SAID those that.. Not an admission that what was NASCAR was thinking.. And Scott was PROBABLY CORRECT... But your source makes it a "done deal" that was the intent... That was in the Stone Age when it required individual "lap counters' people to tally a win.. No GPS sensors, no automatic scoring.. So people fucked up all the time.. And MANY races ended in contention and brawls...


Wendell Scott online

When Scott won in the NASCAR Grand National race at Jacksonville, Florida in 1963 they did not wave the checkered flag for him but initially gave the win to Buck Baker. NASCAR officials said a scoring error was responsible for allowing Baker to accept the winner’s trophy. Scott doubted that explanation. “Everybody in the place knew I had won the race,” he said years later, “but the promoters and NASCAR officials didn’t want me out there kissing any beauty queens or accepting any awards.” While NASCAR did later give the win to Scott, he did not receive the trophy which was reportedly misplaced. 47 years later in 2010 the Scott family was presented a replica trophy. Through all the prejudice he endured, Wendell never retaliated.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

Doubt this ever happened that way.. Even the top teams have no guaranteed performance under race day conditions.. And there's no such thing as a "phony" car.. They all have to meet qualifying speeds. They ALL are tightly regulated by NASCAR.. He got an opportunity to get in a seat on a "rich team" because their driver was injured/sick/suspended or something.. And maybe it was a last minute thing so that THAT TEAM wouldn't lose points. Without the adequate practice time in the seat, they can't set it up properly for the driver..

This is all BULLSHIT to create the impression that "he was set up for embarrassment".. He had NOTHIHG to be embarrassed about....

Go argue that with the NASCAR historian that wrote the story.

He ain't no NASCAR historian.. If he does not know there are NO spare "phony" race cars to prank people with at a NASCAR event.. You don't get to drive another team's car UNLESS there's a last minute or day problem with the driver..

You go read his book and tell me WHAT race, WHAT year and I'll prove it...

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

Published Thursday, January 15, 2009
by Brian Donovan, Special To The Post

As we move toward Martin Luther King Day, Barack Obama’s inauguration and the Daytona 500, it’s an appropriate moment to consider the unusual life of another remarkable racial pioneer: NASCAR’s first black driver, the late Wendell Scott.

A talented racer, Scott began banging fenders with roughneck competitors on Dixie dirt tracks in 1952, during an era when he couldn’t use a white restroom or drinking fountain. The story of his frustrating struggle, little known outside of the racing world, offers a reminder of how much our country has changed – but also of how NASCAR’s progress toward diversity still seems stuck in the past.

Scott’s dream of becoming a competitive national-level racer depended on support from NASCAR’s celebrated founder and czar, the late Bill France Sr. At first, Scott’s prospects looked promising. Early on, France assured him he’d always be treated without prejudice. In the minor leagues Scott won dozens of races and a Virginia state championship.

Like Obama, Scott, who lived in Danville, Va., and often raced in Charlotte, developed surprising numbers of admirers among ordinary white folks in the South. He became one of NASCAR’s most popular drivers, even as an underdog without the corporate sponsorship for a competitive racecar. His passionate determination inspired fans to reconsider racial stereotypes. Unfortunately, his support in the grandstands wasn’t matched in NASCAR’s executive suites.

As the growing civil rights struggle in the ‘60s inflamed racial tensions, France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

For years South Carolina’s major track, Darlington Raceway, banned Scott because he was black. This cost him any chance for sponsorship. France addressed the problem with inaction and silence. When Scott finally asked for help, he said France told him that Darlington was important to NASCAR’s success and Scott should just be patient.

When senior NASCAR officials and major promoters mistreated Scott, France continued his hands-off neutrality. One official abused his authority and excluded Scott from an important race at Charlotte. Others did the same thing at the speedways in Daytona Beach, Fla., and Martinsville, Va. – facilities in which France owned major financial interests. Repeatedly, officials harassed Scott over trivial issues: his son’s beards, minor blemishes in his car’s paint.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

France helped other drivers obtain sponsorship for competitive cars, but not Scott. The pattern of unfairness persisted, insiders say, largely because France and other influential executives in the NASCAR world believed that a competitive black driver would be bad for business. At the time France was cultivating alliances with leading segregationist politicians such as Alabama Governor George Wallace, and those relationships helped NASCAR to grow into today’s multi-billion-dollar enterprise.

Many of the biased actions toward Scott took place as France was negotiating successfully with Wallace for millions of dollars in state subsidies for a huge new speedway at Talladega. Wallace never would have approved that money if NASCAR’s lone black driver had any chance of winning.

Today, more than 35 years after Scott’s last race, America’s racial situation has improved drastically. But NASCAR remains the country’s least diverse major sport, despite a diversity program launched eight years ago. Every regular driver in NASCAR’s three national series is still a white male.

Some of Scott’s admirers feel that some official recognition for him from NASCAR is long overdue – perhaps at the new hall of fame NASCAR is opening this year, perhaps even a public apology for the bigotry he suffered. Others believe an apology would be quite unlikely, since NASCAR, still owned by the France family, says it knows nothing about any unfair treatment of Scott.

BRIAN DONOVAN, a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, is the author of “Hard Driving: The American Odyssey of NASCAR’s First Black Driver.”

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

You got a problem? Argue with him about it.

So I tell you this guy doesn't know jack shit about NASCAR and you just REPOST the article?? Holy shit..

You highlighted the evidence.. He wrote ONE BOOK about ONE Black NASCAR driver... That does not make him "a NASCAR historian"... In fact -- it was his ONLY book and he had ZERO background in motor sports of any kind...

This is why you FLOCK to tales of woes that you can add to that treasure trove of racism that you deny you create and fling onto this forum weekly... You DO collect a lot of stuff that is marginally truthful or even vetted.. Like the white people who AGREE with you that Hallmark Cards, and Princess Hair and Dance Team make-up are examples of racism....

From the Wiki on Brian Donovan --

Career[edit]
He first worked for three years at the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, and was then hired by Newsday in 1967. He retired from Newsday in 2002 to focus on a book, "Hard Driving" about Wendell Scott.[4]

One of the SHORTEST bios I've ever read on a "Pulitzer Prize winning journalist"...

I post the truth. You can't dispute it. This is the only place you can get away with your stupidity. I never said hall mark cards were racist and if you have a problem with the article or the bio contact the writer. You're a dumb ass flacaltenn and the only reason you are trying to argue with me is because there are other idiots here just like you. I and a few other blacks are here outnumbered and you guys can't out debate us. You want to talk shit, but you are too scared to take your try to gaslight ass to a majority black forum. So you're just a bunch of hot air wrapped up in pink skin. I have been right about things I have said here son and I know it. You know it also.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

IM2 you have not articulated the truth since 1969. That's when you said you were going to take a dump.

 

[IM2]

IM2 you have not articulated the truth since 1969. That's when you said you were going to take a dump.

The truth you need to understand white woman, is that if not for us you'd be popping out children and making pies instead of selling houses.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Newsflash to all you prejudice or racist or wtf ever dumbasses.

America was built by whites, blacks, Jews, hispanics, asians, and Indians.

We're all in this thing together, if you want to be free, get a fucking grip and don't be a dumbass.

We are all under fire right now from leftists.
If you want to end up with everybody slaves, keep arguing amongst yourselves.

I will always come out a winner, just because I'm badass like that, but really Americans need to stick together now more than ever.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Major trait of racists is how wrong the information they distribute really is.. Never talked with white racist that EVER had accurate links or information.. And your GUESS about moonshining is just as bad...

Wendell Scott online

Wendell Oliver Scott was a race car driver who won over 128 races in his career in various divisions including a win in the Grand National series, now known as the NASCAR Sprint Cup series. He finished as high as sixth in points in NASCAR’s top series, numerous times in the top-15 in points. Scott won the Richmond track championship and the Virginia State Sportsman title. What makes his accomplishments more intriguing is Scott did this one of the lowest budgets of any team. While many teams had manufacturer backing Scott did nearly all the work on the car himself using mainly used parts and second-hand cars. His sons served often as his pit crew and even Wendell himself pitted his own car. Scott did not even start racing until the age of 30. A former moonshine hauler, Scott developed his driving style on the backroads of Virginia doing his own hot-rodding of his car.

After that 1st win where he was screwed out of the trophy -- it was SCOTT who SAID those that.. Not an admission that what was NASCAR was thinking.. And Scott was PROBABLY CORRECT... But your source makes it a "done deal" that was the intent... That was in the Stone Age when it required individual "lap counters' people to tally a win.. No GPS sensors, no automatic scoring.. So people fucked up all the time.. And MANY races ended in contention and brawls...


Wendell Scott online

When Scott won in the NASCAR Grand National race at Jacksonville, Florida in 1963 they did not wave the checkered flag for him but initially gave the win to Buck Baker. NASCAR officials said a scoring error was responsible for allowing Baker to accept the winner’s trophy. Scott doubted that explanation. “Everybody in the place knew I had won the race,” he said years later, “but the promoters and NASCAR officials didn’t want me out there kissing any beauty queens or accepting any awards.” While NASCAR did later give the win to Scott, he did not receive the trophy which was reportedly misplaced. 47 years later in 2010 the Scott family was presented a replica trophy. Through all the prejudice he endured, Wendell never retaliated.

Doubt this ever happened that way.. Even the top teams have no guaranteed performance under race day conditions.. And there's no such thing as a "phony" car.. They all have to meet qualifying speeds. They ALL are tightly regulated by NASCAR.. He got an opportunity to get in a seat on a "rich team" because their driver was injured/sick/suspended or something.. And maybe it was a last minute thing so that THAT TEAM wouldn't lose points. Without the adequate practice time in the seat, they can't set it up properly for the driver..

This is all BULLSHIT to create the impression that "he was set up for embarrassment".. He had NOTHIHG to be embarrassed about....

Go argue that with the NASCAR historian that wrote the story.

He ain't no NASCAR historian.. If he does not know there are NO spare "phony" race cars to prank people with at a NASCAR event.. You don't get to drive another team's car UNLESS there's a last minute or day problem with the driver..

You go read his book and tell me WHAT race, WHAT year and I'll prove it...

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

Published Thursday, January 15, 2009
by Brian Donovan, Special To The Post

As we move toward Martin Luther King Day, Barack Obama’s inauguration and the Daytona 500, it’s an appropriate moment to consider the unusual life of another remarkable racial pioneer: NASCAR’s first black driver, the late Wendell Scott.

A talented racer, Scott began banging fenders with roughneck competitors on Dixie dirt tracks in 1952, during an era when he couldn’t use a white restroom or drinking fountain. The story of his frustrating struggle, little known outside of the racing world, offers a reminder of how much our country has changed – but also of how NASCAR’s progress toward diversity still seems stuck in the past.

Scott’s dream of becoming a competitive national-level racer depended on support from NASCAR’s celebrated founder and czar, the late Bill France Sr. At first, Scott’s prospects looked promising. Early on, France assured him he’d always be treated without prejudice. In the minor leagues Scott won dozens of races and a Virginia state championship.

Like Obama, Scott, who lived in Danville, Va., and often raced in Charlotte, developed surprising numbers of admirers among ordinary white folks in the South. He became one of NASCAR’s most popular drivers, even as an underdog without the corporate sponsorship for a competitive racecar. His passionate determination inspired fans to reconsider racial stereotypes. Unfortunately, his support in the grandstands wasn’t matched in NASCAR’s executive suites.

As the growing civil rights struggle in the ‘60s inflamed racial tensions, France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

For years South Carolina’s major track, Darlington Raceway, banned Scott because he was black. This cost him any chance for sponsorship. France addressed the problem with inaction and silence. When Scott finally asked for help, he said France told him that Darlington was important to NASCAR’s success and Scott should just be patient.

When senior NASCAR officials and major promoters mistreated Scott, France continued his hands-off neutrality. One official abused his authority and excluded Scott from an important race at Charlotte. Others did the same thing at the speedways in Daytona Beach, Fla., and Martinsville, Va. – facilities in which France owned major financial interests. Repeatedly, officials harassed Scott over trivial issues: his son’s beards, minor blemishes in his car’s paint.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

France helped other drivers obtain sponsorship for competitive cars, but not Scott. The pattern of unfairness persisted, insiders say, largely because France and other influential executives in the NASCAR world believed that a competitive black driver would be bad for business. At the time France was cultivating alliances with leading segregationist politicians such as Alabama Governor George Wallace, and those relationships helped NASCAR to grow into today’s multi-billion-dollar enterprise.

Many of the biased actions toward Scott took place as France was negotiating successfully with Wallace for millions of dollars in state subsidies for a huge new speedway at Talladega. Wallace never would have approved that money if NASCAR’s lone black driver had any chance of winning.

Today, more than 35 years after Scott’s last race, America’s racial situation has improved drastically. But NASCAR remains the country’s least diverse major sport, despite a diversity program launched eight years ago. Every regular driver in NASCAR’s three national series is still a white male.

Some of Scott’s admirers feel that some official recognition for him from NASCAR is long overdue – perhaps at the new hall of fame NASCAR is opening this year, perhaps even a public apology for the bigotry he suffered. Others believe an apology would be quite unlikely, since NASCAR, still owned by the France family, says it knows nothing about any unfair treatment of Scott.

BRIAN DONOVAN, a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, is the author of “Hard Driving: The American Odyssey of NASCAR’s First Black Driver.”

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

You got a problem? Argue with him about it.

So I tell you this guy doesn't know jack shit about NASCAR and you just REPOST the article?? Holy shit..

You highlighted the evidence.. He wrote ONE BOOK about ONE Black NASCAR driver... That does not make him "a NASCAR historian"... In fact -- it was his ONLY book and he had ZERO background in motor sports of any kind...

This is why you FLOCK to tales of woes that you can add to that treasure trove of racism that you deny you create and fling onto this forum weekly... You DO collect a lot of stuff that is marginally truthful or even vetted.. Like the white people who AGREE with you that Hallmark Cards, and Princess Hair and Dance Team make-up are examples of racism....

From the Wiki on Brian Donovan --

Career[edit]
He first worked for three years at the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, and was then hired by Newsday in 1967. He retired from Newsday in 2002 to focus on a book, "Hard Driving" about Wendell Scott.[4]

One of the SHORTEST bios I've ever read on a "Pulitzer Prize winning journalist"...

I post the truth. You can't dispute it. This is the only place you can get away with your stupidity. I never said hall mark cards were racist and if you have a problem with the article or the bio contact the writer. You're a dumb ass flacaltenn and the only reason you are trying to argue with me is because there are other idiots here just like you. I and a few other blacks are here outnumbered and you guys can't out debate us. You want to talk shit, but you are too scared to take your try to gaslight ass to a majority black forum. So you're just a bunch of hot air wrapped up in pink skin. I have been right about things I have said here son and I know it. You know it also.

You can't debate your way out of a wet paper bag, moron. You're the weakest link.

Your reparations check is in the mail, douchewad, right about never!

You could be a reason for segregation, but I have more faith in black Americans than that.

We know turds when we see them, doodoo.

 

[IM2]

Go argue that with the NASCAR historian that wrote the story.

He ain't no NASCAR historian.. If he does not know there are NO spare "phony" race cars to prank people with at a NASCAR event.. You don't get to drive another team's car UNLESS there's a last minute or day problem with the driver..

You go read his book and tell me WHAT race, WHAT year and I'll prove it...

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

Published Thursday, January 15, 2009
by Brian Donovan, Special To The Post

As we move toward Martin Luther King Day, Barack Obama’s inauguration and the Daytona 500, it’s an appropriate moment to consider the unusual life of another remarkable racial pioneer: NASCAR’s first black driver, the late Wendell Scott.

A talented racer, Scott began banging fenders with roughneck competitors on Dixie dirt tracks in 1952, during an era when he couldn’t use a white restroom or drinking fountain. The story of his frustrating struggle, little known outside of the racing world, offers a reminder of how much our country has changed – but also of how NASCAR’s progress toward diversity still seems stuck in the past.

Scott’s dream of becoming a competitive national-level racer depended on support from NASCAR’s celebrated founder and czar, the late Bill France Sr. At first, Scott’s prospects looked promising. Early on, France assured him he’d always be treated without prejudice. In the minor leagues Scott won dozens of races and a Virginia state championship.

Like Obama, Scott, who lived in Danville, Va., and often raced in Charlotte, developed surprising numbers of admirers among ordinary white folks in the South. He became one of NASCAR’s most popular drivers, even as an underdog without the corporate sponsorship for a competitive racecar. His passionate determination inspired fans to reconsider racial stereotypes. Unfortunately, his support in the grandstands wasn’t matched in NASCAR’s executive suites.

As the growing civil rights struggle in the ‘60s inflamed racial tensions, France reneged on his promise, and a pattern of unfair treatment by NASCAR followed. France denied Scott the rookie-of-the-year award for his first major-league season, even though Scott was the top rookie in the standings. When Scott won his only national race, NASCAR officials, fearing he’d kiss the white trophy queen, declared another driver the victor.

Long after the crowd and the queen had left, NASCAR grudgingly admitted that Scott had won.

For years South Carolina’s major track, Darlington Raceway, banned Scott because he was black. This cost him any chance for sponsorship. France addressed the problem with inaction and silence. When Scott finally asked for help, he said France told him that Darlington was important to NASCAR’s success and Scott should just be patient.

When senior NASCAR officials and major promoters mistreated Scott, France continued his hands-off neutrality. One official abused his authority and excluded Scott from an important race at Charlotte. Others did the same thing at the speedways in Daytona Beach, Fla., and Martinsville, Va. – facilities in which France owned major financial interests. Repeatedly, officials harassed Scott over trivial issues: his son’s beards, minor blemishes in his car’s paint.

At one prestigious NASCAR event, Scott was exploited in a bogus promotional scheme. A record crowd packed Charlotte’s speedway after the promoter announced he’d give Scott his first chance to drive a competitive car. But the car was a phony; its weak performance embarrassed Scott in front of 81,000 spectators.

France helped other drivers obtain sponsorship for competitive cars, but not Scott. The pattern of unfairness persisted, insiders say, largely because France and other influential executives in the NASCAR world believed that a competitive black driver would be bad for business. At the time France was cultivating alliances with leading segregationist politicians such as Alabama Governor George Wallace, and those relationships helped NASCAR to grow into today’s multi-billion-dollar enterprise.

Many of the biased actions toward Scott took place as France was negotiating successfully with Wallace for millions of dollars in state subsidies for a huge new speedway at Talladega. Wallace never would have approved that money if NASCAR’s lone black driver had any chance of winning.

Today, more than 35 years after Scott’s last race, America’s racial situation has improved drastically. But NASCAR remains the country’s least diverse major sport, despite a diversity program launched eight years ago. Every regular driver in NASCAR’s three national series is still a white male.

Some of Scott’s admirers feel that some official recognition for him from NASCAR is long overdue – perhaps at the new hall of fame NASCAR is opening this year, perhaps even a public apology for the bigotry he suffered. Others believe an apology would be quite unlikely, since NASCAR, still owned by the France family, says it knows nothing about any unfair treatment of Scott.

BRIAN DONOVAN, a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist, is the author of “Hard Driving: The American Odyssey of NASCAR’s First Black Driver.”

NASCAR’s darkest chapter is its racism

You got a problem? Argue with him about it.

So I tell you this guy doesn't know jack shit about NASCAR and you just REPOST the article?? Holy shit..

You highlighted the evidence.. He wrote ONE BOOK about ONE Black NASCAR driver... That does not make him "a NASCAR historian"... In fact -- it was his ONLY book and he had ZERO background in motor sports of any kind...

This is why you FLOCK to tales of woes that you can add to that treasure trove of racism that you deny you create and fling onto this forum weekly... You DO collect a lot of stuff that is marginally truthful or even vetted.. Like the white people who AGREE with you that Hallmark Cards, and Princess Hair and Dance Team make-up are examples of racism....

From the Wiki on Brian Donovan --

Career[edit]
He first worked for three years at the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, and was then hired by Newsday in 1967. He retired from Newsday in 2002 to focus on a book, "Hard Driving" about Wendell Scott.[4]

One of the SHORTEST bios I've ever read on a "Pulitzer Prize winning journalist"...

I post the truth. You can't dispute it. This is the only place you can get away with your stupidity. I never said hall mark cards were racist and if you have a problem with the article or the bio contact the writer. You're a dumb ass flacaltenn and the only reason you are trying to argue with me is because there are other idiots here just like you. I and a few other blacks are here outnumbered and you guys can't out debate us. You want to talk shit, but you are too scared to take your try to gaslight ass to a majority black forum. So you're just a bunch of hot air wrapped up in pink skin. I have been right about things I have said here son and I know it. You know it also.

You can't debate your way out of a wet paper bag, moron. You're the weakest link.

Your reparations check is in the mail, douchewad, right about never!

You could be a reason for segregation, but I have more faith in black Americans than that.

We know turds when we see them, doodoo.

Yep we know you are a turd. Most black Americans are like me. If I came to your town and started a program the majority of the blacks there would support me. The imaginary blacks you talk about don't exist. You can't out debate me and in 2020 reparations will be an issue.

 

[IM2]

Newsflash to all you prejudice or racist or wtf ever dumbasses.

America was built by whites, blacks, Jews, hispanics, asians, and Indians.

We're all in this thing together, if you want to be free, get a fucking grip and don't be a dumbass.

We are all under fire right now from leftists.
If you want to end up with everybody slaves, keep arguing amongst yourselves.

I will always come out a winner, just because I'm badass like that, but really Americans need to stick together now more than ever.

The left is not the problem. This country has never been united.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Newsflash to all you prejudice or racist or wtf ever dumbasses.

America was built by whites, blacks, Jews, hispanics, asians, and Indians.

We're all in this thing together, if you want to be free, get a fucking grip and don't be a dumbass.

We are all under fire right now from leftists.
If you want to end up with everybody slaves, keep arguing amongst yourselves.

I will always come out a winner, just because I'm badass like that, but really Americans need to stick together now more than ever.

The left is not the problem. This country has never been united.

You're either ignorant, delusional, or both. Either way I don't care, dork.

Cya!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

IM2 you have not articulated the truth since 1969. That's when you said you were going to take a dump.

The truth you need to understand white woman, is that if not for us you'd be popping out children and making pies instead of selling houses.

I have never sold a house in my life. I've kept miserable two bit criminals out of prison. And secretly smiled when the next criminal offs them in a drive by. So yes. If it were not for you and your kind giving me money to keep Bubba from raping your skanky ass I might have worked corporate.

 

[Muhammed]

There is no way that there can be coexistence with black people.

Now unless they are slaves hey?

Today’s Republicans want to bring slavery back.

Wow! that is a fucking ignorant statement.

From the it's inception, the Republican party has always opposed slavery and supported equal rights for women and minorities. Republicans are and have always been morally outraged by the institution of slavery.

The Republicans ended slavery and Jim Crow. They fought for, and, despite vehement and often extremely vicious, bloody, and cruel opposition from the Democrats, won the hard fought battle to emancipate the slaves and empower blacks with the right to vote.

Despite the just plain evil efforts by scumbag Democrats to derail their agenda, the Republicans, (often losing their lives in the process), eventually were victorious over the racist, sexist Democrats and obtained equal rights for minorities and women.

The Democratic party is the party of slavery. The Republican party was created to end slavery and will always be opposed to slavery.

Blacks who vote Democrat are idiotic political chumps. Anyone who votes Democrat is an immoral piece of shit.

 

[Penelope]

There is no way that there can be coexistence with black people.

Now unless they are slaves hey?

Today’s Republicans want to bring slavery back.

Wow! that is a fucking ignorant statement.

From the it's inception, the Republican party has always opposed slavery and supported equal rights for women and minorities. Republicans are and have always been morally outraged by the institution of slavery.

The Republicans ended slavery and Jim Crow. They fought for, and, despite vehement and often extremely vicious, bloody, and cruel opposition from the Democrats, won the hard fought battle to emancipate the slaves and empower blacks with the right to vote.

Despite the just plain evil efforts by scumbag Democrats to derail their agenda, the Republicans, (often losing their lives in the process), eventually were victorious over the racist, sexist Democrats and obtained equal rights for minorities and women.

The Democratic party is the party of slavery. The Republican party was created to end slavery and will always be opposed to slavery.

Blacks who vote Democrat are idiotic political chumps. Anyone who votes Democrat is an immoral piece of shit.

Why not read something:
Wilmot Proviso - Wikipedia It was the South verses North and still is today.

 

[IM2]

IM2 you have not articulated the truth since 1969. That's when you said you were going to take a dump.

The truth you need to understand white woman, is that if not for us you'd be popping out children and making pies instead of selling houses.

I have never sold a house in my life. I've kept miserable two bit criminals out of prison. And secretly smiled when the next criminal offs them in a drive by. So yes. If it were not for you and your kind giving me money to keep Bubba from raping your skanky ass I might have worked corporate.

Dumb white woman, your ass had no civil rights and the civil rights act applied to your dumb ass.

So let me bust your bubble dumb racist b, white women are a protected class and if you are a lawyer thank affirmative action.

 

[IM2]

There is no way that there can be coexistence with black people.

Now unless they are slaves hey?

Today’s Republicans want to bring slavery back.

Wow! that is a fucking ignorant statement.

From the it's inception, the Republican party has always opposed slavery and supported equal rights for women and minorities. Republicans are and have always been morally outraged by the institution of slavery.

The Republicans ended slavery and Jim Crow. They fought for, and, despite vehement and often extremely vicious, bloody, and cruel opposition from the Democrats, won the hard fought battle to emancipate the slaves and empower blacks with the right to vote.

Despite the just plain evil efforts by scumbag Democrats to derail their agenda, the Republicans, (often losing their lives in the process), eventually were victorious over the racist, sexist Democrats and obtained equal rights for minorities and women.

The Democratic party is the party of slavery. The Republican party was created to end slavery and will always be opposed to slavery.

Blacks who vote Democrat are idiotic political chumps. Anyone who votes Democrat is an immoral piece of shit.

This is not 1860. Lying like you are doing is immoral. Hate to tell you but the majority of democrats voted for our right to vote. And as the first black president was a democrat why is it that you actually try saying these things? Any black voting republican is a political chump. What X said in 1963 does not apply now.

 

[IM2]

Newsflash to all you prejudice or racist or wtf ever dumbasses.

America was built by whites, blacks, Jews, hispanics, asians, and Indians.

We're all in this thing together, if you want to be free, get a fucking grip and don't be a dumbass.

We are all under fire right now from leftists.
If you want to end up with everybody slaves, keep arguing amongst yourselves.

I will always come out a winner, just because I'm badass like that, but really Americans need to stick together now more than ever.

The left is not the problem. This country has never been united.

You're either ignorant, delusional, or both. Either way I don't care, dork.

Cya!

You're the delusional one son. Name me a time when this nation was united boy. Not when whites like you imagined it was.

Dumb ass.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Since the beginning of time, groups, tribes, and cultures have held a sense of superiority over other cultures to the point of enslavement which occurs to this day worldwide. I am curious, if this is all a creation at the feet of white people, why would any non-white culture or group continue this practice as well as demeaning other cultures as being inferior?

The premise of my response was if mixed races would help ease racial relationships. The reality is that there are groups and peoples, white and non-white alike, that never want to see progress and need strife to thrive.

Since the beginning of time does not excuse us for today. And that is the excuse used by whites who are racist to deny the damage that racism has caused which has gone unfixed and then to declare themselves the moral authority on how others should do things. Ethnocentrism has been most of what occurred in Ancient times but that's just as wrong.

I am looking at modern times and modern times show us a 4-5 century pattern of international aggression by whites as they decided to colonize people and control lands outside of Europe. The statement was made that mixed children might be the answer. I agree with you that it will take much more. And in my view more means that damages made by past racist policies of colonization etc by whites must be fixed. In addition any damage caused ethnically due to those policies must be fixed by the offending ethnic groups.

In America damage caused by racist government laws and policy must be corrected and economic assistance must be provided for programs of community and economic development to the negatively affected communities .

Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day. American whites evolved by stopping African slave trade. But, there is a new modern day form of slave trade.... human sex trafficking with many of the victims being non-white and oppressed by non whites.

I am intent on not giving white Americans a pass for the racism they practjce here right now.

Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery
African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Defensive Strategies - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Armed Struggle in Africa and in the Middle Passage - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
The Growth in Arrivals - U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade

Whites did have slaves in Europe and the American whites did not stop the African slave trade. Furthermore American whites evolved by implementing apartheid. And today whites practice aversive racism. There are millions of white sex slaves but the problem is not limited to slavery. The western nations through what they have done due to colonization and modern foreign policy still rob non white nations of wealth, destabilize governments, install puppet leaders to help carry out the will of multi national corporations.

Somalia: How Colonial Powers drove a Country into Chaos - Global Research

You are not going to guilt me into not holding whites accountable for what they have done and keep doing. Understand that I have studied and researched these things for well over 30 years. So when you make a statement like:

" Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day."

That to me shows a pretty simplistic opinion about a complex set of issues. For example how was slavery done in Africa before the whites showed up? And do you not understand that slavery existed in Europe at the same time and in fact exists there today? But my argument does just include slavery and I 'm not talking about events that occurred during the Pleistocene epoch. I'm talking about the modern era and on top of that I have agreed with much of what you have said. But I'm not going to make non whites equally racist as whites. I have not seen a non white country colonize another one. But I have seen severe ethnocentrism and that's just as bad.

Slavery is practiced in African nations to this day! The face of the human traffic oppressor is largely brown,not white. You choose not to hold non-whites equally accountable for current and legacy racism but reality and facts state otherwise.

Oh no, I hold blacks just as accountable. But there is no equivalence between a black person calling an asian a racial slur and electing white racists to make laws. You seem unable to see the difference.

And slavery is practiced in European nations to this day. The face of human trafficking is a rainbow. Reality and facts say that. Reality shows us that Asians sent sex slaves to white America. That Eastern European whites are selling humans also. So the face of that trafficking is not just brown. But in typical white fashion you want to stay stuck on slavery and ignore the legacy of racist foreign polices by whites that are at the root of many of todays worlds problems.

You mention the rainbow and holding non-whites accountable yet in a “yes-but” typical fashion, ultimately, what lies between your ears, it’s always whitey’s fault.

 

[IM2]

Since the beginning of time does not excuse us for today. And that is the excuse used by whites who are racist to deny the damage that racism has caused which has gone unfixed and then to declare themselves the moral authority on how others should do things. Ethnocentrism has been most of what occurred in Ancient times but that's just as wrong.

I am looking at modern times and modern times show us a 4-5 century pattern of international aggression by whites as they decided to colonize people and control lands outside of Europe. The statement was made that mixed children might be the answer. I agree with you that it will take much more. And in my view more means that damages made by past racist policies of colonization etc by whites must be fixed. In addition any damage caused ethnically due to those policies must be fixed by the offending ethnic groups.

In America damage caused by racist government laws and policy must be corrected and economic assistance must be provided for programs of community and economic development to the negatively affected communities .

Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day. American whites evolved by stopping African slave trade. But, there is a new modern day form of slave trade.... human sex trafficking with many of the victims being non-white and oppressed by non whites.

I am intent on not giving white Americans a pass for the racism they practjce here right now.

Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery
African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Defensive Strategies - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Armed Struggle in Africa and in the Middle Passage - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
The Growth in Arrivals - U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade

Whites did have slaves in Europe and the American whites did not stop the African slave trade. Furthermore American whites evolved by implementing apartheid. And today whites practice aversive racism. There are millions of white sex slaves but the problem is not limited to slavery. The western nations through what they have done due to colonization and modern foreign policy still rob non white nations of wealth, destabilize governments, install puppet leaders to help carry out the will of multi national corporations.

Somalia: How Colonial Powers drove a Country into Chaos - Global Research

You are not going to guilt me into not holding whites accountable for what they have done and keep doing. Understand that I have studied and researched these things for well over 30 years. So when you make a statement like:

" Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day."

That to me shows a pretty simplistic opinion about a complex set of issues. For example how was slavery done in Africa before the whites showed up? And do you not understand that slavery existed in Europe at the same time and in fact exists there today? But my argument does just include slavery and I 'm not talking about events that occurred during the Pleistocene epoch. I'm talking about the modern era and on top of that I have agreed with much of what you have said. But I'm not going to make non whites equally racist as whites. I have not seen a non white country colonize another one. But I have seen severe ethnocentrism and that's just as bad.

Slavery is practiced in African nations to this day! The face of the human traffic oppressor is largely brown,not white. You choose not to hold non-whites equally accountable for current and legacy racism but reality and facts state otherwise.

Oh no, I hold blacks just as accountable. But there is no equivalence between a black person calling an asian a racial slur and electing white racists to make laws. You seem unable to see the difference.

And slavery is practiced in European nations to this day. The face of human trafficking is a rainbow. Reality and facts say that. Reality shows us that Asians sent sex slaves to white America. That Eastern European whites are selling humans also. So the face of that trafficking is not just brown. But in typical white fashion you want to stay stuck on slavery and ignore the legacy of racist foreign polices by whites that are at the root of many of todays worlds problems.

You mention the rainbow and holding non-whites accountable yet in a “yes-but” typical fashion, ultimately, what lies between your ears, it’s always whitey’s fault.

The truth is what lies in me. And the truth is that the root cause of the problems blacks and other non whites face is white racism. Now that doesn't mean I am for any kind of prejudice, but until whites have the capacity to stop imagining a racial symmetry that has never existed, people like you will not understand my position. You will assume just like you are doing now but you will not understand.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day. American whites evolved by stopping African slave trade. But, there is a new modern day form of slave trade.... human sex trafficking with many of the victims being non-white and oppressed by non whites.

I am intent on not giving white Americans a pass for the racism they practjce here right now.

Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery
African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Defensive Strategies - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
Armed Struggle in Africa and in the Middle Passage - African Resistance - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade
The Growth in Arrivals - U.S. Slave Trade - The Abolition of The Slave Trade

Whites did have slaves in Europe and the American whites did not stop the African slave trade. Furthermore American whites evolved by implementing apartheid. And today whites practice aversive racism. There are millions of white sex slaves but the problem is not limited to slavery. The western nations through what they have done due to colonization and modern foreign policy still rob non white nations of wealth, destabilize governments, install puppet leaders to help carry out the will of multi national corporations.

Somalia: How Colonial Powers drove a Country into Chaos - Global Research

You are not going to guilt me into not holding whites accountable for what they have done and keep doing. Understand that I have studied and researched these things for well over 30 years. So when you make a statement like:

" Ultimately, you are clearly intent on blaming whites for all racism. You largely deny racism existing in other cultures or if there are acts of racism, it’s all American white / Western European fault. American whites did not start trading African slaves. Africans started it and some Africans continue the practice to this day."

That to me shows a pretty simplistic opinion about a complex set of issues. For example how was slavery done in Africa before the whites showed up? And do you not understand that slavery existed in Europe at the same time and in fact exists there today? But my argument does just include slavery and I 'm not talking about events that occurred during the Pleistocene epoch. I'm talking about the modern era and on top of that I have agreed with much of what you have said. But I'm not going to make non whites equally racist as whites. I have not seen a non white country colonize another one. But I have seen severe ethnocentrism and that's just as bad.

Slavery is practiced in African nations to this day! The face of the human traffic oppressor is largely brown,not white. You choose not to hold non-whites equally accountable for current and legacy racism but reality and facts state otherwise.

Oh no, I hold blacks just as accountable. But there is no equivalence between a black person calling an asian a racial slur and electing white racists to make laws. You seem unable to see the difference.

And slavery is practiced in European nations to this day. The face of human trafficking is a rainbow. Reality and facts say that. Reality shows us that Asians sent sex slaves to white America. That Eastern European whites are selling humans also. So the face of that trafficking is not just brown. But in typical white fashion you want to stay stuck on slavery and ignore the legacy of racist foreign polices by whites that are at the root of many of todays worlds problems.

You mention the rainbow and holding non-whites accountable yet in a “yes-but” typical fashion, ultimately, what lies between your ears, it’s always whitey’s fault.

The truth is what lies in me. And the truth is that the root cause of the problems blacks and other non whites face is white racism. Now that doesn't mean I am for any kind of prejudice, but until whites have the capacity to stop imagining a racial symmetry that has never existed, people like you will not understand my position. You will assume just like you are doing now but you will not understand.

Your position is very clear - blame whites for all problems facing Blacks and other non-whites. You’ve made that very clear; truthfully speaking.

 

[Muhammed]

There is no way that there can be coexistence with black people.

Now unless they are slaves hey?

Today’s Republicans want to bring slavery back.

Wow! that is a fucking ignorant statement.

From the it's inception, the Republican party has always opposed slavery and supported equal rights for women and minorities. Republicans are and have always been morally outraged by the institution of slavery.

The Republicans ended slavery and Jim Crow. They fought for, and, despite vehement and often extremely vicious, bloody, and cruel opposition from the Democrats, won the hard fought battle to emancipate the slaves and empower blacks with the right to vote.

Despite the just plain evil efforts by scumbag Democrats to derail their agenda, the Republicans, (often losing their lives in the process), eventually were victorious over the racist, sexist Democrats and obtained equal rights for minorities and women.

The Democratic party is the party of slavery. The Republican party was created to end slavery and will always be opposed to slavery.

Blacks who vote Democrat are idiotic political chumps. Anyone who votes Democrat is an immoral piece of shit.

Why not read something:
Wilmot Proviso - Wikipedia It was the South verses North and still is today.

Bullshit. Today the south is chock full of Republicans who abhor the institution of slavery, Jim Crow and other fucked up 100% Democrat policies.

Republicans have never supported slavery. You party of slavery supporters are disgusting.

 

[Muhammed]

There is no way that there can be coexistence with black people.

Now unless they are slaves hey?

Today’s Republicans want to bring slavery back.

Wow! that is a fucking ignorant statement.

From the it's inception, the Republican party has always opposed slavery and supported equal rights for women and minorities. Republicans are and have always been morally outraged by the institution of slavery.

The Republicans ended slavery and Jim Crow. They fought for, and, despite vehement and often extremely vicious, bloody, and cruel opposition from the Democrats, won the hard fought battle to emancipate the slaves and empower blacks with the right to vote.

Despite the just plain evil efforts by scumbag Democrats to derail their agenda, the Republicans, (often losing their lives in the process), eventually were victorious over the racist, sexist Democrats and obtained equal rights for minorities and women.

The Democratic party is the party of slavery. The Republican party was created to end slavery and will always be opposed to slavery.

Blacks who vote Democrat are idiotic political chumps. Anyone who votes Democrat is an immoral piece of shit.

This is not 1860. Lying like you are doing is immoral. Hate to tell you but the majority of democrats voted for our right to vote. And as the first black president was a democrat why is it that you actually try saying these things? Any black voting republican is a political chump. What X said in 1963 does not apply now.

What Malcolm X said in 1963 matters even more now than it did then. Since then, the Democrats have been waging total war on black families and imposing mass incarceration on the residents of black neighborhoods for petty crimes and shooting unarmed niggas left and right in those Democrat-controlled cities.

Under Trump and Republican rule, black unemployment is at a historical low, especially among black women.

Quit being such a weakling political chump.