You misrepresented my post because you didn't understand the context. Now go change your diaper.
You said:
"Religion is anti-human rights. It sees women as second class citizens. Do gays and trans people have the same human rights in religion as heteros? No."
So I responded with:
You're a little confused and wandered off the reservation there. Rights are protected by government, people are free to join any religion they want. They are not free to define it for others so they can feel normal.
Pointing out that religion isn't there to defend or support rights you see fit. You made an ignorant statement and now want to obfuscate the point and make it personal about me. Like a toddler throwing a fit.
Ok then, if you insist on this misdirection, I'll play along. You're wrong, lots of religions in a lot of countries set what human rights are allowed. You lose. Better luck next time.
It wasn't a misdirection, I responded to the specific point. Your statement said religion, not some or most. Those in those religions obviously don't share your view, like sexual preferences being a right.
And when they have the power of the state they are theocracies, that's where the protection of rights or prosecution comes in, not the religion itself. Religion is a belief so you did wander way off the reservation and are STILL lost.