Bryan Dean Wright has penned two
exceptional articles about his side of the aisle. He is essentially proposing a left-wing version of the Tea Party - which is what I've been saying the left needs to do for about 5 years now. We cannot afford to have any more Nixon's and Clinton's in politics. We need men and women of character who will respect the law and facilitate transparency.
The right started that process with the Tea Party and the results have been encouraging. Around 1,000 seats changed hands from Democrats to Republicans during Barack Obama's terms.
This is a reasonable, rational liberal who I would be happy to reach across the aisle and work with - and what he is proposing here has the potential to rebuild the Democrat Party. I hope the left will listen and act on his advice. The nation will be much stronger for it.
Why I am still a Democrat (even though I can't stand my party right now)
Whoa, good for him.
In the meantime, here’s one simple idea: abandon divisive groups like “Gays for Obama” or “Latinos for Obama.” How refreshing it would be for committees to instead be based on our cities, like “Denver for Obama.” We’d all show up as neighbors – black and white, gay and straight.
Beautiful. How traditionally LIBERAL.
That's great to see, but it will be so counter-intuitive to most of them right now that it won't even register. They'll knock it off like flies.
I'd love to see a Right populist vs. Left populist paradigm come out of this. I just don't know if the Democratic party, as currently configured, can do it.
.
Exceptional post
Mac1958. The part you pointed out is exactly the part I pointed out to my family when I read that. The sad part is - the Dumbocrats need and
want divisiveness. Their history of failure (Obamacare being a great example) stands on it's own. What will they have left if they don't run on class warfare, etc.?
Bryan Dean Wright has penned two
exceptional articles about his side of the aisle. He is essentially proposing a left-wing version of the Tea Party - which is what I've been saying the left needs to do for about 5 years now. We cannot afford to have any more Nixon's and Clinton's in politics. We need men and women of character who will respect the law and facilitate transparency.
The right started that process with the Tea Party and the results have been encouraging. Around 1,000 seats changed hands from Democrats to Republicans during Barack Obama's terms.
This is a reasonable, rational liberal who I would be happy to reach across the aisle and work with - and what he is proposing here has the potential to rebuild the Democrat Party. I hope the left will listen and act on his advice. The nation will be much stronger for it.
Why I am still a Democrat (even though I can't stand my party right now)
Whoa, good for him.
In the meantime, here’s one simple idea: abandon divisive groups like “Gays for Obama” or “Latinos for Obama.” How refreshing it would be for committees to instead be based on our cities, like “Denver for Obama.” We’d all show up as neighbors – black and white, gay and straight.
Beautiful. How traditionally LIBERAL.
That's great to see, but it will be so counter-intuitive to most of them right now that it won't even register. They'll knock it off like flies.
I'd love to see a Right populist vs. Left populist paradigm come out of this. I just don't know if the Democratic party, as currently configured, can do it.
.
Exceptional post
Mac1958. The part you pointed out is exactly the part I pointed out to my family when I read that. The sad part is - the Dumbocrats need and
want divisiveness. Their history of failure (Obamacare being a great example) stands on it's own. What will they have left if they don't run on class warfare, etc.?
Identity Politics have so consumed the more radicalized elements of the party for so long, that it's blinding them to other ways of thinking. That one little notion that I quoted is both powerful and simple, but it's outside their lane. They just don't see it, and nothing will make them see it.
I'm a Left-leaning independent, and this is pretty frustrating for me. I think the party would do fine on the issues if it would just stop with this division crap. I've read a lot of opinion pieces on how to "fix" the party, and NONE of them deals with this. That shows me how blind they are right now.
.
I read up till page 2 where I ran into these posts from you guys. I probably should have added Mamooth to the quote list, but he/she wouldn't listen anyway-------->
Unless new people get control of the Dem party, it is not going to change because it can not win in that form.
What do I mean/why?
Look at every social program, every one of them. Which one is in the black, and not the red? What about Obamacare, our newest nugget of social justice programs? Nobody will ever say Democrat ideas are not kind, compassionate, or loving.........what people in know say is--------->they are UNSUSTAINABLE!
Once you understand the premise that Democrats can no longer win on ideas for poor people as most taxpayers now understand any new program will be unaffordable, you then realize they have to have division politics to win. Think about what I am saying for a second. Show us a successful Democratic freebie that does NOT need a cash infusion from the taxpayer! With the debt at the levels it is at, to push any program through would be political suicide. It was for most Democrats in purple states over Obamacare, it just wasn't for Obama himself!
So then, to prove the point, what did Hilly run on! FREE COLLEGE! Who was going to pay for that? THE RICH! You see, divisive politics, the poor and middle class against the rich! Divisive doesn't have to mean melanin, it can mean income too, and the Dems sure use that! Also she was all for fixing Obamacare. How? Same way Trump is, nobody knows, lol.....but her ideas were good, and Trumps aren't. OK, but I think hers had to do again, with the rich! Division again! Not the country paying for it together, picking a group, and fleecing them!
In the end, modern Democrats stand for nothing but division. They can NOT pay for anything unless they divide us. What do you think would happen if the Democratic story went like this---------> We have this great idea for a social program, it is wonderful, and most of you will agree. We are going to pay for it by EVERYBODY who works paying an extra 11 dollars a week in taxes-)
What do you think would happen? They would be laughed out of the race, period, and they know it! And so, they have to pick a bogeyman, some group to turn into the devil. The rich! Bankers! Oil Company's! The Fracking industry! Wall Street! And that is the ONLY way Democrats can NOW put forth a platform that they do, because they have to have a way to PAY for it! Hey, lets screw the defense department! Lets take part of their budget! And it goes on, and on!
So, both articles at the start of this thread were promising, they really were; but if there is no more boogeyman politics, then there is nobody to fleece, then their is no more new FREEBIES, so what are the Democrats going to run on? Even the 2012 exit polls showed that the massive majority of he electorate believed Romney was the better choice, but he didn't care about them like Obama did! Well, Obama would have been a cold hearted crank without the freebies he was offering, and he couldn't offer them without promising to take the cash to pay for all of them from some group, the evil RICH!
Finally, if you doubt my assessment, I ask you to think of the 2nd vote getter in the Democratic primary, Senator Bernie Sanders. OK, remember his young crowds? Remember how enthusiastic they were? What was his platform? Should I remind you! GIVE AWAY VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING! And how was he going to pay for it-)
Soooooooo, I want to know what the Democrats are going to run on? What is more, if there is no division politics, how long before...............just because mathematics say it should be without a push..............Black Americans get closer to the norm of 50-50, or even 70-30? Okay, now how are the Democrats going to win?
Today, this very instance, and if you read this board it will dawn on everyone--------> JFK was a Democrat who won on IDEAS! Today, Democrats for the most part do NOT exist....only in name..........because that party is run by far leftists who do not run on ideas that work, they run on promises that can NOT work, but lying to the people is fine, because the ends justify the means.
I contend if JFK was President today, he would throw 1/2 of these far leftists in the hoosgow, and prosecute them for treason! He would absolutely prosecute for treason anyone who demanded an open border.........and yet, Democrats think this is the norm. It is terrible, just terrible, and while I hope somebody does light a fire under the Democrats because I actually think we need them, we also see what happened when a moderate challenged Pelosi. It just isn't going to happen, any time soon, sorry!