Why has the left cancelled Martin Luther King, Jr?

For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Why aren't there violent protests and looting because of the female veteran shot by a cop on. January 6th during the so called insurrection?
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?
Nope.
Then what?
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?
Nope.
Then what?
Criminal culture. Being poor doesn't equate to being a criminal. Excusing criminal behavior because someone is poor only encourages more criminal behavior by poor people. You have a screw loose.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
The people who twisted the Bible were the slave owners, not the abolitionists. Christianity doesn't endorse slavery.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?
Nope.
Then what?
Criminal culture. Being poor doesn't equate to being a criminal. Excusing criminal behavior because someone is poor only encourages more criminal behavior by poor people. You have a screw loose.
Why did any revolution anywhere start?
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws
Bullshit.

MLK saw enough George Floyd’s in his day
He would also be outraged at the erosion of voting rights that he fought so hard for
Bullshit. You're spreading propaganda. Requiring an ID is not an erosion of voting rights.
Requiring an ID is not all this does.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
The people who twisted the Bible were the slave owners, not the abolitionists. Christianity doesn't endorse slavery.
Whites twisted the bible.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Out of 11,000 protests, 500 had violence. 65 percent of those violent interactions were started by police and white supremacists. They caught white supremacists setting fires and vandalizing property.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Out of 11,000 protests, 500 had violence. 65 percent of those violent interactions were started by police and white supremacists. They caught white supremacists setting fires and vandalizing property.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
The people who twisted the Bible were the slave owners, not the abolitionists. Christianity doesn't endorse slavery.
Whites twisted the bible.
Oh yeah, and Jesus was Black, huh. Idiot.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
The people who twisted the Bible were the slave owners, not the abolitionists. Christianity doesn't endorse slavery.
Whites twisted the bible.
Oh yeah, and Jesus was Black, huh. Idiot.
Whites twisted the bible and a white man was not walking around in the middle east teaching people gods laws as recorded in the gospels.
 
For decades, the left preached MLK’s message to not judge someone by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Now, they do not judge by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.

When did this change and why?

MLK preached racial reconciliation, not racial division. The media and Dims are only about racial division. MLK has become a quaint anachronism.

MLK would have supported BLM and be outraged at the George Floyd killing
He also would have opposed Georgia’s revised voting laws

Maybe. But he damn sure would not have approved torching American cities for months. Your team loves that shit.

He preached non violent protest.

But if you want to see torched cities, you should look at 1968 after Dr King was assassinated.

Enough is enough

Right, you and your team support torching cities. Violence is good and the ends justify the means. Isn't that what Stalin said?

I'm sure MLK would be proud. :(
Support?
No

Realize the causes?
Yes
So what causes people to destroy and loot someone's business?
Inequality and poverty?

Got it. Violence is justified if they play on your team. :thup:
Right wingers are worse. They were Rebels without a Cause to try to keep slavery in our Union.
Bible believers were the abolitionists and the people helping escaped slaves through the underground railroad.

There were also Bible believers in the South who used the Bible to justify to slaves why they need to serve their masters
They were wrong in their interpretation, weren't they.

Like much of the Bible, you can twist it to serve your purpose.

In the case of the slaves, their owners read them the Bible where it says they must serve their masters
The people who twisted the Bible were the slave owners, not the abolitionists. Christianity doesn't endorse slavery.
Whites twisted the bible.
Oh yeah, and Jesus was Black, huh. Idiot.
Whites twisted the bible and a white man was not walking around in the middle east teaching people gods laws as recorded in the gospels.
Jesus was a Jew.
 

Forum List

Back
Top